New Scientist - 21.09.2019

(Brent) #1
21 September 2019 | New Scientist | 5

IT IS only just spring in Australia,
but bush fire season has already
begun, raising concerns that
there may be worse to come.
At their height earlier this
month, around 140 wildfires were
raging across eastern Queensland
and north-east New South Wales.
They have destroyed dozens of
homes and forced thousands of
people to flee. Some of the blazes
spanned hundreds of kilometres.
While there are now fewer fires,
this could lull people into a false
sense of security, says Philip
Stewart at the University of
Queensland. The latest weather
forecasts say the chances of fire
are “high” and “very high” across
affected areas in the coming days.
A change in the wind direction

or its strength could stoke fires
or cause them to alter course,
says Stewart. “Until fires are
completely out, it is not really
good to say that it’s safe.”
A combination of very low
humidity, gusty winds and
abnormally warm weather led
to the conditions that allowed
the flames to take hold earlier
than usual. Some areas saw
temperatures soar 10°C higher
than average, while some regions
are also into a third year of record
low rainfall. The threat of bush
fires will be higher than normal in
most of the country this summer.

Additionally, several of the
recent fires appear to have been
started deliberately, says Paul Read
at the National Centre for Research
in Bushfire and Arson. Police are
questioning suspects.
To better manage the bush fire
risk, there needs to be greater
recognition that Australia is a
fire-prone continent and a return
to the controlled burning practised
by Indigenous Australians for
millennia, says Stewart. “They
didn’t just sit back and wait until
vegetation was so dry that you had
catastrophic fire events as you see
now,” he says. ❚

Blazes devastating the country’s east coast have arrived unusually early,
raising fears about what is to come. Ruby Prosser Scully reports

Sexual health

Force often part of
first sex experience
ONE in 16 US girls and
women were forced into
their first experience of sex,
either physically or through
other kinds of pressure.
The figure comes from
an analysis of a national
survey run by the US Centers
for Disease Control and
Prevention.
Laura Hawks of Harvard
Medical School and her
team analysed the responses
from 13,000 women aged
between 18 and 44 who
answered the survey in the
past eight years. The team
used the term “forced” for
those who said their first
experience of sex with a
man was “not voluntary”.
About half of those who
responded this way said they
had been held down. About
a quarter were physically
harmed and a quarter
physically threatened – with
overlap between the groups.
About half reported being
verbally pressured, such as
being told the relationship
would end unless they had
sex, and a fifth said they had
been given alcohol or drugs.
Even when no physical
coercion was used, the
average age of women
forced into sex was 15 and
the average age of men was
27, says Hawks. “You’re
automatically getting a
picture of a huge power
imbalance,” she says.
There was less of an age
difference for those who
first had sex voluntarily:
the average age was 17 for
the women and 21 for the
male partner (JAMA Internal
Medicine, doi.org/dbk6). ❚
Clare Wilson

Spring fires in Australia


News


JASON O’BRIEN/EPA-EFE/SHUTTERSTOCK


Iceland extinction
Vikings’ love of
ivory was bad news
for walruses p

Infinite lottery
50-year-old maths
problem finally
solved p

Pesticide concern
Are chemicals
contributing to
bird declines? p

Psychiatric disorders
Brain network linked
to mental health
conditions p

Research ethics
The Jeffrey Epstein
science-funding
scandal p

More news articles online
Stay up to date with the latest science and tech news
newscientist.com/news
Free download pdf