these differences in perception, many of them subconscious, have an influence on
how people think and use language. This cultural dynamic is known aslinguistic rela-
tivityand was set forth in the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. The hypothesis asserted“that
language profoundly shapes the perceptions and world view of its speakers.”^11 Sapir
and Whorf suggested,“differences between languages must have consequences that
go far beyond mere grammatical organization and must be related to profound diver-
gence in modes of thought.”^12 Hence, the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis argued that lan-
guage is not simply a means of reporting experience but, more importantly, a way of
defining experience. To explain this concept, Sapir and Whorf wrote,
Human beings do not live in the objective world alone, nor alone in the world of social
activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language
which has become the medium of expression for their society.... The real world is to a large
extent unconsciously built up on the language habits of the group. No two languages are
Language allows
people to establish
relationships and to
express and exchange
ideas and information.
© David Frazier/PhotoEdit
Language and Thought 271
Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).