The Boston Globe - 20.09.2019

(nextflipdebug5) #1

A4 TheWorld The Boston Globe FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2019


By Dan Bilefsky
and Ian Austen
NEW YORK TIMES
Revelations that Prime Min-
ister Justin Trudeau of Canada
has dressed up in brownface
and blackface on multiple occa-
sions have rocked his re-elec-
tion campaign, reinforcing a
narrative that has dogged him
throughout his political career:
that he isn’t really who he por-
trays himself to be.
Trudeau has long cast him-
self as a glittering spokesman
for the world’s beleaguered lib-
erals, standing up to President
Trump, supporting gender and
Indigenous rights, welcoming
immigrants, and fighting cli-
mate change and racism.
But that carefully calibrated
image suffered a major blow


this week when photos and a
video emerged of the prime
minister dressing up as racist
caricatures in the early 1990s
and in 2001.
One showed him at an “Ara-
bian Nights” party, costumed as
Aladdin in brownface makeup
and a turban, his arms wrapped
around a woman. The picture
was taken while Trudeau was
29 and teaching at a school in
Vancouver, British Columbia.
While apologizing for that
image at an appearance on
Wednesday night, Trudeau also
admitted to dressing up in
blackface while performing
“Day-O,” the Jamaican folk
song, in high school.
On Thursday morning,
more damaging material sur-
faced. Trudeau’s campaign
spokeswoman, Zita Astravas,
confirmed that a video posted
by GlobalNews, a Canada-based
news organization, showed the
prime minister in the early
1990s dressed in blackface and

an Afro wig. In the video, he is
waving his hands around and
sticking out his tongue.
“Justin Trudeau has careful-
ly crafted an image of what Ca-
nadians aspire to: hope, open-
ness to the world, and youth,”
said Jean-Marc Léger, chief ex-
ecutive of Léger, a leading poll-
ing company in Montreal. “The
blackface episode shatters that
perfect image and casts ques-
tions on his authenticity.”
Nevertheless, he said, Cana-
dians were a “forgiving people”
and predicted that Trudeau,
who on Wednesday night apol-
ogized repeatedly for behavior
that had taken place nearly two
decades ago, could still recover.
“This is something I
shouldn’t have done many
years ago,” Trudeau said
Wednesday. “It was something
that I didn’t think was racist at
the time, but now I recognize it
was something racist to do, and
I am deeply sorry.”
On Thursday, Trudeau said

he did not disclose the black-
face incident caught on the vid-
eo because he did not remem-
ber the episode, saying that his
life of privilege came “with a
massive blindspot.”
Nik Nanos, the founder of
Nanos Research, an Ottawa
polling firm, said that finding a
way back, while not impossible,
will be very difficult for
Trudeau and his Liberal Party.
“This is about as bad news
as you can get in a campaign,”
he said. “The Liberals have to
find a way to change the chan-
nel.”
Nanos said that even before
this week’s news, support for
the Conservative Party,
Trudeau’s principal opponent,
began inching upward after
Conservatives ran attack ads
suggesting the prime minister
was “not as advertised.”
“The Justin Trudeau revela-
tion is a validation of the Con-
servative attack,” Nanos said.
”Right now the election is

about Justin Trudeau,” Nanos
added. “And in my experience,
the person an election is about
loses.”
In many ways Trudeau has a
strong hand as the Oct. 21 na-

tional election approaches.
Canada’s economy is vibrant,
with unemployment at historic
lows. His move to bring in
25,000 Syrian refugees was
widely acclaimed and his gov-
ernment introduced several pi-
oneering policies, including le-
galizing recreational marijuana
and assisted dying.
But in Canada, he is a deeply
polarizing figure. Some, espe-
cially in the western parts of the
country, have long seen him as
too showy and sanctimonious,
an elitist do-gooder who was
never up to the job.
Others see him as a powerful
symbol of a humanistic country
who, in the era of Trump,
helped a middle-level country
punch above its weight globally.
“Everything the prime min-
ister does is a calculation about
his image,” said Nicola Di Iorio,
who recently stepped down as a
Liberal member of parliament
of a district in Montreal. “There
are too many gimmicks.”

Resurfaced video of Trudeau in blackface compounds scandal


‘Carefullycrafted’


imagedamaged,


pollsterssay


By Mari Yamaguchi
ASSOCIATED PRESS
TOKYO — A Japanese court
ruled Thursday that three for-
mer executives of Tokyo Elec-
tric Power Company were not
guilty of professional negli-
gence in the 2011 disaster at
the Fukushima nuclear power
plant because ensuring abso-
lute safety at nuclear plants was
not a government requirement
at that time.
The ruling by the Tokyo Dis-
trict Court ended the only crim-
inal trial related to the nuclear
accident that has kept tens of
thousands of residents away
from their homes because of
lingering radiation contamina-
tion.
Lawyers representing the
5,700 Fukushima residents
who filed the criminal com-
plaint said they will push prose-
cutors to appeal the decision. A
group of supporters stood out-
side the court Thursday with
placards reading ‘‘Unjust rul-
ing.’’

The court said ex-TEPCO
chairman Tsunehisa Katsuma-
ta, 79, and two other former ex-
ecutives were also not guilty of
causing the deaths of 44 elderly
patients whose health deterio-
rated during or after forced
evacuations from a local hospi-
tal and a nursing home.
The executives were accused
of failing to anticipate the mas-
sive tsunami that struck the Fu-
kushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant
on March 11, 2011, following a
magnitude 9 earthquake, and
of failing to take measures that
might have protected the plant.
Katsumata and codefen-
dants Sakae Muto, 69, and Ichi-
ro Takekuro, 73, pleaded not
guilty at the trial’s opening ses-
sion in June 2017. They said
predicting the tsunami was im-
possible. Three of the plant’s re-
actors had meltdowns, spread-
ing radiation into surrounding
communities and into the sea.
Prosecutors in December re-
quested five-year prison sen-
tences for each executive. In its
ruling, the court said the defen-
dants held responsible posi-
tions at TEPCO, but that did not
necessarily mean they were re-
sponsible for taking measures
beyond those in the legal regu-
latory framework.
It said there is no proof they
could have foreseen that a tsu-
nami could flood the plant the
way it did in 2011.

Executives


notguilty


forroleat


Fukushima


Japanesecourt


findsnonegligence


By Susannah George
WASHINGTON POST
KABUL — Violence in Af-
ghanistan killed at least 24 ci-
vilians Thursday as the country
prepares for presidential elec-
tions following the collapse of
peace talks earlier this month.
A Taliban suicide bomber
struck a hospital in southern
Afghanistan and left more than
15 dead, while in the country’s
east, a US airstrike killed nine
civilians, according to US and
Afghan officials.
The Ministry of Interior said
the car bomb in the southern
Zabul province also wounded
66 people. The Taliban said in a
statement it was targeting an
intelligence headquarters near
the hospital.
The blast follows a Taliban
attack Wednesday that hit an
office issuing voter identifica-
tion cards and a bombing the
day before at a campaign rally
held by Afghan President
Ashraf Ghani.
The US airstrike was con-
ducted in Nangahar province
early Thursday morning and
was targeting Islamic State
group fighters, according to
Colonel William Leggett, a US
military spokesman in Kabul.
Leggett said the strike is un-
der investigation and US forces
are working with local officials
to ‘‘determine whether there
was collateral damage.’’
‘‘We are fighting in a com-
plex environment against those
who intentionally kill and hide
behind civilians,’’ Leggett said
in a statement.
Attaullah Khogyani, the


spokesman for the Nangahar
provincial governor said the
strike hit farmers working in
the fields and the death toll is
expected to rise.
But later in the day, Nanga-
har Governor Shahmahmood
Miakhel disputed the reports of
civilian casualties. He said all
those killed were militants.
The United States is con-
ducting operations against the
local branch of the Islamic
State in addition to fighting
against the Taliban in Afghani-
stan.
The Islamic State has signifi-
cantly fewer forces than the Tal-
iban and in many parts of the
country they fight each other,
but US officials see the Islamic
State as the greater terrorist
threat.

Many in Afghanistan feared
new waves of violence after the
collapse in peace talks earlier
this month coupled with prepa-
rations for presidential elec-
tions on Sept. 28.
Both US and Taliban forces
pledged to step up attacks after
President Trump abruptly de-
clared the talks ‘‘dead’’ after
more than a year of negotia-
tions. The Taliban have also re-
peatedly pledged to derail a
vote they described as a ‘‘fake
presidential election,’’ warning
civilians to stay away from elec-
tion-related offices and events.
If violence escalates, many
fear extremely low turnout that
could undermine the election’s
legitimacy. Security concerns
have delayed the election twice,
and the government an-

nounced that some 2,500 out of
7,400 polling stations will be
closed on Election Day. Most of
the closed sites are in provinces
where insurgents are active.
The Taliban is estimated to con-
trol or influence nearly half of
Afghanistan’s 400 districts,
most of them rural.
In a statement condemning
the violence Wednesday, Secre-
tary of State Mike Pompeo
called on the Taliban to ‘‘dem-
onstrate a genuine commit-
ment to peace rather than con-
tinue the violence and destruc-
tion that causes such
inordinate harm to the Afghan
people and the future of their
country.’’
Separately, Pompeo an-
nounced in a statement Thurs-
day that the US government

was taking a series of steps in
response to corruption in Af-
ghanistan. Pompeo said the
United States would withhold
about $100 million from a large
energy infrastructure project
but would continue to support
the project by other means.
‘‘We expect the Afghan govern-
ment to demonstrate a clear
commitment to fight corrup-
tion, to serve the Afghan peo-
ple, and to maintain their
trust,’’ Pompeo said. The secre-
tary of state also added that the
United States would withhold
$60 million due to transparen-
cy concerns regarding the Af-
ghan national procurement au-
thority and would cease fund-
ing the Afghan monitoring and
evaluation committee at the
end of the calendar year.

Violence


escalates


asAfghan


votelooms


Talibanvowsto


derailelection


AHMAD WALI SARHADI/ASSOCIATED PRESS
An Afghan security member helped people carry an injured man after a suicide attack devastated an area hospital.

By Karla Adam
and William Booth
WASHINGTON POST
LONDON — Just as it
seemed Brexit couldn’t become
any more surreal, a former
Conservative prime minister
argued against the current
Conservative prime minister
Thursday on the third and final
day of a landmark Supreme
Court hearing.
John Major submitted in
written testimony that the con-
tention that there are no legal
constraints on a prime minis-
ter’s ability to suspend Parlia-
ment ‘‘would be a remarkable
position for the courts to en-
dorse.’’
Major further accused Boris
Johnson of being motivated by
‘‘political interest’’ when he de-
cided to shut down Parliament
for five weeks ahead of the
deadline for Britain to leave the
European Union.
Major has been a vocal op-
ponent of Brexit and has advo-
cated for a second referendum.
So his opposition to Johnson,
who headlined the 2016 Brexit


campaign, is not surprising.
But it is unusual for British
prime ministers from the same
party to challenge each other so
directly.
The case is testing the outer
limits of Britain’s unwritten
constitution and the balance of
power between the executive,
legislature, and judiciary.
‘‘None of this is easy,’’ Bren-
da Hale, the president of the
Supreme Court, told the court-
room. She promised a ruling
‘‘early next week.’’
The high court was called in
for an emergency session to
weigh contrasting judgments
over Johnson’s decision to sus-
pend Parliament until mid-Oc-
tober. Britain is scheduled to
leave the European Union on
Oct. 31, though a withdrawal
deal remains elusive.
A Scottish court ruled that
Johnson’s suspension was an
‘‘egregious’’ overreach that
aimed to thwart the legisla-
ture’s ability to scrutinize the
government’s Brexit plans. An
English court dismissed a relat-
ed case saying that it was a po-

litical matter and not one for
the courts to decide.
If the Supreme Court finds
Johnson acted unlawfully —
and essentially misled the
queen when he requested her
approval — it is possible law-
makers could return almost im-
mediately to work.

On Thursday, however,
speaking in Wiltshire, England,
Johnson would not rule out
suspending Parliament again if
he lost the case.
The three-day hearing —
streamed live — has been by
turns unprecedented, impene-
trable, important, and a bit tes-

ty.
On Wednesday, Aidan
O’Neill, a lawyer representing
70-plus lawmakers who
launched a case against John-
son’s shutdown, told the judges
not to let ‘‘the mother of Parlia-
ments be shut down by the fa-
ther of lies.’’
O’Neill called Johnson’s gov-
ernment ‘‘unworthy of our
trust.’’
On Thursday, Richard Keen,
a lawyer for the government,
called the charges against
Johnson ‘‘discourteous, incen-
diary, and wholly unwarrant-
ed.’’
Keen warned the judges
against wading into an ‘‘ill-de-
fined minefield.’’
Johnson did not provide the
court an explanation for his de-
cision — which Major said was
‘‘conspicuous.’’
Johnson has said publicly
that the suspension was neces-
sary to prepare a new legisla-
tive agenda. It’s normal for a
government to do that, but the
length of the break is usually
measured in days, not weeks.

Ex-primeministerweighsinonquestionofJohnson’sauthority


MATT DUNHAM/ASSOCIATED PRESS
A Brexit supporter protested outside the Supreme Court in
London, where judges will decide if Johnson broke the law.

Lawyersforthe


defendantssaid


thatpredictingthe


tsunamiwould


havebeen


impossible.


HO / TIME INC. / AFP
Canada’s Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau costumed as
Aladdin in brownface
makeup at a party in 2001.
Free download pdf