Politico - 19.09.2019

(nextflipdebug5) #1

12 | POLITICO | THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2019


Kamala Harris’ support is plung-
ing in Iowa, where she’s seen a
13-point drop since July, accord-
ing to a new poll.
Notably, the survey, commis-
sioned by Focus on Rural America
and taken after the third presiden-
tial debate in Houston, was con-
ducted by Harris’ chief pollster,
David Binder.
In July, after a breakout debate
in Miami, Harris was statistically
tied with Elizabeth Warren and Joe
Biden for first place in the first-in-
the-nation-caucuses state.
The survey, conducted Sept.
14-17, shows Harris sliding into
sixth place, with Biden retaking
the lead he lost over the summer
with 25 percent. Harris recently
embarked on a statewide bus tour
and was the first in the field to run
ads in Iowa. The Harris campaign
did not immediately respond to a
request for comment.
The former vice president is sta-
tistically tied with Warren, who is
at 23 percent. Pete Buttigieg, mean-
while, moved into third place, with
12 percent of those surveyed saying
they’d back him for president.
Biden’s 8-point gain since July is
a sign he’s rebuilding the losses he’s
faced in Iowa as he has struggled
to catch up organizationally with
Warren, who began laying down
infrastructure in the state in Janu-
ary. Biden has ramped up his vis-
its to Iowa and increased his level
of staffing to become one of the
largest campaign organizations
on the ground. Warren, though,
has steadily gained support and is
widely considered to have the best
organization in the state.
“At this stage, the race is still
fluid but it’s also very close,” said
Jeff Link, co-founder of Focus
on Rural America. “Once again,
organization matters. It will be
imperative for Biden to match the
Warren organization to maintain
this lead. And, rural counties could
make the difference because they
are harder to organize. That’s why
taking Trump to task on biofuels
and standing up to Big Oil could tip
the scales.”
The poll of 500 likely Democratic
caucusgoers was conducted Sept.
14-17 via phone. Its margin of er-
ror is plus or minus 4.4 percentage
points.


BY NATASHA KORECKI


New poll


finds Harris’


support has


plunged 13


points in Iowa


Fifty-eight mayors announced
their endorsements of Pete Butti-
gieg, giving the South Bend, Ind.,
mayor a boost of institutional sup-
port for his presidential campaign.
In a USA Today op-ed, the cur-
rent and former mayors, includ-
ing some who already have pub-
licly backed Buttigieg, called for “a
great mayor in the White House.”
The column — written by May-
ors Steve Adler of Austin, Texas;

Christopher Cabaldon of West Sac-
ramento, Calif.; and Nan Whaley of
Dayton, Ohio — emphasizes But-
tigieg’s bipartisan credentials and
executive experience.
“We endorse him from heart-
land towns, coastal cities, subur-
ban communities, and every other
corner of our great country,” the
mayors wrote. “What’s more, in
the spirit of the community of
mayors, we are already offering
Pete our best ideas and helping

engage grassroots supporters all
across the country.”
A lthough most of the mayors are
white, Buttigieg picked up some
key endorsements from mayors of
color, a constituency of voters with
whom Buttigieg has struggled to
make headway, including in the
key-primary state of South Caro-
lina. Buttigieg picked up his first
endorsement from a Hispanic of-
ficial: Mayor Michelle De La Isla of
Topeka, Kan., the city’s first Latina

mayor. Former Mayor Sly James of
Kansas City, Mo., and Mayor Mark
Barbee of Bridgeport, Pa., both of
whom are black, also signed on to
the endorsement.
Several mayors also hail from
early nominating states, including
Ryan Arndorfer of Britt, Iowa, and
Suzanne Prentiss of Lebanon, N.H.
Another notable nod came from
Breea Clark, mayor of Norman,
Okla., hometown of Sen. Elizabeth
Wa r ren.

BY ELENA SCHNEIDER


Nearly 60 mayors and ex-mayors endorse Buttigieg


WIN MCNAMEE/GETTY IMAGES
Kamala Harris has fallen to
sixth place in Iowa in the 2020
Democratic presidential primary.


LOS ANGELES — Pete Buttigieg ap-
peared to smother Beto O’Rourke in
the early stages of the presidential
primary, captivating viral media
attention and surging in primary
polls just as O’Rourke stalled.
Now comes Round Two, as the
two youthful Democrats, in need to
regain a step in the primary, have
begun tangling over guns.
The spat — which gained airtime
on cable TV over the weekend and
spilled into this week — pits two
fresh-faced, telegenic candidates
facing a transitional moment in
their campaigns. Buttigieg, who’s
plateaued in national polling, is
looking to assemble a campaign
in keeping with the staggering
$25 million he raised last quarter.
O’Rourke, who’s languished in
low single-digit support, is trying
to recapture his early mojo with
a passionate crusade to curb gun
violence.
After the debate last week at
which O’Rourke called for man-
datory government buybacks of
assault weapons, Buttigieg was
asked on CNN whether O’Rourke
was “playing into the hands of
Republicans.”
“Yes,” Buttigieg answered.
“We have agreement among the
American people for not just uni-
versal background checks, but we
have a majority in favor of red flag
laws, high capacity magazines,
banning the new sale of assault
weapons. This is a golden moment
to finally do something because
we’ve been arguing about this for as
long as I’ve been alive. W hen even
this president and even Mitch Mc-
Connell are at least pretending to
be open to reforms. We know that
we have a moment on our hands.
Let’s make the most of it and get
these things done.”
“Well, sh--,” O’Rourke respond-
ed, hours later, tearing into candi-
dates he said are “triangulating,
poll-testing, focus-group driving
their response,” adding that “Don-
ald Trump and Mitch McConnell
pretending to be interested in some-
thing that is literally a life-or-death
issue ... is simply not enough.”
Then, after Trump said this
week that he would not consider a
universal background checks bill
passed by the House, the former
Texas congressman rubbed it in.
“Exactly,” O’Rourke said, when

asked during a campaign stop on
Tuesday about Trump’s spurning
of Democrats on gun control. “And
Pete even admitted that T rump was
only pretending, so why would you
change your position, or moderate
your position to meet someone
who’s only pretending halfway.”
Asked in South Carolina about
O’Rourke’s recent criticisms, But-
tigieg said Tuesday he’s “focused
on what we can do right now, be-
cause I don’t think we can wait.”
He also said he “could care less”
how Republicans might react to
gun control reforms and that he’s
“talking not just about politics, but
about governing” and “what we can
do right now.”
Buttigieg has “consistently”
supported background checks on
gun sales, an assault weapons ban
and red flag laws, said campaign
spokesman Chris Meagher.
O’Rourke isn’t the only Democrat
supportive of mandatory buybacks.
Kamala Harris said on Jimmy Fal-
lon’s “Tonight Show” on Monday
that a buyback program is a “good
idea,” and Cory Booker supports
such a proposal.
But O’Rourke is pressing the case
for buybacks most forcefully, and
the opportunity to draw a contrast
with Buttigieg is especially signifi-
cant to his campaign. O’Rourke
and Buttigieg are battling to be the
choice of voters seeking a genera-
tional change. They are also young,
white men who lean less heavily on
their résumés than on their biogra-
phies and next-generation appeal.
It’s not clear what effect this
sparring might have on their poll-
ing. A CNN national poll last week
found O’Rourke at 5 percent, while
a Morning Consult survey on Mon-
day had him at 4 percent, just 1 per-
centage point behind Buttigieg. But
in an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll

released Tuesday, O’Rourke failed
to register above 1 percent, while
Buttigieg rose to 7 percent.
But the back-and-forth may ul-
timately help both candidates as
they struggle for oxygen in a pri-
mary dominated by the three top-
polling candidates.
“Pete’s trying to, and has been
all along, positioning himself as a
pragmatic progressive. ... Beto has
become a missionary for a cause,
to stop gun violence, which is re-
ally admirable [but] the politics of
that, and Beto knows this, are more
complicated than that,” said David
Axelrod, who served as chief strate-
gist for President Barack Obama.
“In this fight, it probably serves
both their purposes.”
It’s also a reminder that “Beto
was going to be the ‘next genera-
tion’ candidate, and Pete usurped
that space, so it’s not surprising to
see this back-and-forth,” Axelrod
added.
Watch i n g O’Rou rke a nd B ut-
tigieg sparring, one Democratic
strategist involved with another
presidential campaign scoffed,
“Isn’t this like the Spiderman
meme, where the two spidermen
are pointing at each other?”
“They’re just two very similar
characters trying to carry a very
similar space in this battle,” he
added.
O’Rourke’s supporters privately
acknowledged their glee in the re-
emergence of headlines featuring
their candidate’s name alongside
Buttigieg’s. Many O’Rourke loyal-
ists still grouse about the day this
spring when Buttigieg, gently chid-
ing O’Rourke for his habit at the time
of standing on chairs and tables, told
a crowd in New Hampshire, “I heard
the way you ingratiate yourself to
voters is to stand on things, so I
found this park bench here.”

And they know that slicing into
Buttigieg could help O’Rourke’s
cause now.
“The reality is that Buttigieg has
been thought of in a higher tier or
strata than O’Rourke ... and there’s
usually very little value in punch-
ing down,” said Chris Lippincott,
a Texas-based consultant who
ran a super PAC opposing Sen.
Ted Cruz in O’Rourke’s near-miss
Senate campaign last year. “[But]
O’Rourke has elevated his idea
and his campaign with this policy
proposal, and that will force other
candidates to respond.”
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), who
has endorsed Buttigieg, said the
Indiana mayor is “doing his best
to deescalate the confrontation”
because “he wants to stay focused
on the bigger picture.”
“Ninety-eight percent [of the
time] Pete and Beto agree,” Beyer
said. “It’s a difference between
what’s possible in the near term, the
next two years, and what’s possible
over 10 years or more.”
It’s also a stylistic contrast “be-
tween a mayor, whose main empha-
sis is on figuring out really specific,
concrete things to advance the ball,
and a legislator, who is speaking in,
perhaps, more aspirational terms,”
said Austin Mayor Steve Adler, who
endorsed Buttigieg over his fellow
Texan.
Gun control activists are split
on whether mandatory buyback
programs would prove as effective
as other reforms like background
checks and red flag laws. But a
spokesman for Everytown for Gun
Safety told Fox News that though
“presidential candidates are talk-
ing about a number of policies to
address gun violence in America,”
background checks and a federal
red flag laws “need to be the Sen-
ate’s first priorities.”
O’Rourke drew newfound at-
tention after the mass shooting at
a Walmart in his hometown of El
Paso, Texas, including for his man-
datory buyback proposal.
Democratic strategist Mathew
Littman, a former Biden speech-
writer who works on gun reform
issues, said Democrats should
“start on the areas that we agree
upon” on gun control, including
universal background checks and
“red-flag” laws.
But Littman, who now backs
Kamala Harris in the primary,
said O’Rourke is “getting a lot of
attention now that he hadn’t been
getting previously.”
“He’s staked out a position in the
Democratic primary that is a little
bit different than everybody else’s,”
Littman said, “and he’s benefiting
from it.”

BY DAVID SIDERS


AND ELENA SCHNEIDER


Mayor Pete vs. Beto: The battle is back on


A spat over gun
control has revived the
rivalry between the
next-gen hopefuls

GETTY IMAGES PHOTOS
Mayor Pete Buttigieg (left) and ex-Rep. Beto O’Rourke have claimed distinct
positions on gun control: Buttigieg favors a mixture of popular policy fixes,
while O’Rourke advocates a mandatory assault weapon buyback.
Free download pdf