Jim_Krane]_Energy_Kingdoms__Oil_and_Political_Sur

(John Hannent) #1

3. The Big Payback


B


y the 1970s, oil- producing countries had grown tired of being
yoked to industrial powers in lopsided trade relations. Academic
thinking of the era accentuated the humiliation. The popular
“dependency theory” declared that producer countries had “surren-
dered” their primary resources to the rich North, which had captured
most of the value by converting raw inputs into finished goods. Rich
countries resold these goods back to the global South at inflated prices.
This cycle constituted a “dependency trap,” and the only way out was to
seize national resources and industrialize.
Few oil producers had the nerve to step up alone and launch an out-
right expropriation of American or British corporate assets, as Mexico
had done in 1938. Iran’s 1951 nationalization of the Anglo- Iranian Oil
Co.’s holdings offered a stark demonstration of the risks. Tehran’s take-
over resulted in a brutal UK- led clampdown that halted Iran’s oil exports,
undermined its economy, and led to events that brought down the
country’s budding democracy. Within two years, the resulting disarray
brought a CIA- backed coup that handed the shah, a Western- friendly
monarch, absolute power. After the 1953 coup, the new National Iranian
Oil Co. (NIOC) still technically owned the country’s oil sector. But NIOC
operated under a consortium of western IOCs that controlled the terms—
and the marketing— of Iranian oil.
Free download pdf