Financial Times Europe - 06.09.2019

(nextflipdebug5) #1

4 ★ FINANCIAL TIMES Friday6 September 2019


T


he thing about grown-ups is they are supposed
to say when enough is enough.Jim Mattis adh
obviously had enough when he resigned as
Donald Trump’s secretary of defencein
December. Now the retired general — and the
former leading “adult” in Mr Trump’s administration —
says he owes a “duty of silence” to the government in
which he could no longer serve. Some attribute Mr Mattis’s
coyness to the military code of honour — though he retired
from the marines two years before Mr Trump picked him.
Either way he joins a small army of people who could dam-
age Mr Trump but have chosen not to.
Such self-effacement is only adding to America’s demo-
cratic crisis. In the past three years westerners have dis-
covered that their political systems rely less on the sanctity
of the law than on the mettle of people in office. This
applies as much to unelected officials in the judiciary, the
military and the civil service as to elected politicians. It
includes democracies with a written constitution, such as
the US, and ones that run by convention, such as Britain. It
also applies to people who have quit government. The
secret to a strong democracy is its norms, not its rules. To
paraphrase Edmund Burke, the only thing that is neces-
sary for liberal democracy’s demise is for good people to do
nothing.
Mr Mattis is in good company. His recent memoir,Call
Sign Chaos: Learning to Lead, was anticipated as a warning
about the direction in which Mr Trump is taking the US. In
the event, the only president Mr Mattis’s book criticises is
Barack Obama (for letting politics trump military strat-
egy). Mr Mattis thought it
would be inappropriate
to attack a “sitting presi-
dent”. He also thought he
had implied enough
ab out Mr Trump by
resigning as Pentagon
chief last year. The same
applies to Rex Tillerson,
Mr Trump’s first secre-
tary of state, who privately described the president as a
“f***ing moron” but has largely kept his counsel in public.
A similar meekness possessed Robert Mueller, the
former special counsel, when he testified about his report
to Congress in July. Instead of spelling out the contents of
his damning 448-page report, which few Americans have
read, Mr Mueller used recurring non-answers such as
“that’s outside my purview”. LikeMr Mattis, Mr Mueller
held a grenade in his handthat he chose to keep pinned.
Both men served their country with honour for decades.
Neither, it seems, could alter the habits of a lifetime to take
on the once-in-a-lifetime danger posed by Mr Trump.
America’s 45th president has changed the norms. The old
guard continues to function as if the old normal applies.
But the biggest abdication has come from elected
Republicans. Mitt Romney, the senator from Utah, once
called Mr Trump a “phoney” and a “fraud”. It is a fair bet
he still thinks that in private. In public, however, Mr Rom-
ney is a reliable supporter of most things Mr Trump does.
Mr Romney’s silence when Mr Trump smashes another
convention — telling non-white Democratic congress-
women to “go home” for example — is deafening. The same
applies to almost all of his 250 colleagues in Congress. Just
one, Justin Amash, has stood up to Mr Trump. He will not
run again. Mr Trump had made it plain he would back a
primary challenger to unseat him.
The contrast with the self-sacrifice of 21 Conservative
rebels in Britain’s parliament this week is stark. Each of
them knew they would e expelled from the party if theyb
voted against Boris Johnson, the prime minister. “No I
don’t recognise my party,” saidKenneth Clarke, who was
elected in 1970 when Mr Johnson was six. “It’s been taken
over by a knockabout character.” Mr Clarke, unlike
Mr Amash, is nearing the end of his career. Unlike Mr Mat-
tis, however, he was prepared to speak truth to power in
public.
The important lesson is that democracy is not a military
chain of command. The system stands or falls by the
actions of its servants. Shortly before Mr Mattis launched
his memoir, he rejoined the board ofGeneral Dynamics,
one of America’s largest defence contractors. Mr Mattis’s
worth to GD is inversely related to the value of what he can
say about the future of US democracy. The more he speaks
against Mr Trump, the likelier his company will suffer.

[email protected]

GLOBAL INSIGHT


WASHINGTON


Edward


Luce


Silence is golden for


Trump but perilous


for liberal democracy


Like Mr Mattis,


Mr Mueller held a
grenade in his hand

that he chose to
keep pinned

I N T E R N AT I O N A L


JA M E S P O L I T I— WASHINGTON
TO M M I TC H E L L— BEIJING


The US and China have agreed to
resume face-to-face negotiations in a
bid to ease tensions in their rapidly esca-
lating trade war, according to state-
ments from both Washington and Bei-
jing.
The decision to press ahead with a
new round of direct talks came after a
call between Liu He, China’s vice-pre-
mier, and top US officials including Rob-
ert Lighthizer, the US trade representa-
tive, and Steven Mnuchin, the US Treas-
ury secretary.
“They agreed to hold meetings at the
ministerial level in Washington in the
coming weeks,” a USTR spokesperson


said in a statement published on
Wednesday night. “In advance of these
discussions, deputy-level meetings will
take place in mid-September to lay the
ground work for meaningful progress,”
he added.
In its statement, China’s commerce
ministry was more specific with regard
to the timing, saying that the visit to
Washington by top Beijing officials was
set for early October.
Global stocks yesterday reacted posi-
tively. At one point the S&P 500 rose 1.
per cent, boosted by growth in US pri-
vate payrolls and a rebound in US serv-
ices. The CSI 300 benchmark of Shang-
hai- and Shenzhen-listed stocks closed
up 1 per cent and Japan’s Topix ended
the day 1.8 per cent higher.
The resumption of direct talks — the
first since negotiations in Shanghai in
late July — will offer some modest hope
that the US and China can avert a fur-
ther deepening of their trade conflict,

which has raged for a year and a half.
However, few expect the two countries
to move quickly back to the position
they were in last April, when they were
on the verge of adeal.
The decision to press ahead with more
talks comes amid growing alarm about
the impact of the US-China trade war on
the global economy. In the US, the pain
from the tariff battle is showing signs of
spreading from agricultural states,
which were hit hard by China’s retalia-
tory tariffs, to the manufacturing sector,
which is suffering from weakening
demand internationally.
This week, two Republican senators
travelled to Beijing for talks with senior
Chinese officials, including Mr Liu, in a
visit that was widely viewed as an effort
to lay the groundwork for a possible
detente.
“President [Donald] Trump and Pres-
ident Xi [Jinping] have developed a spe-
cial relationship, and we are hopeful

their renewed negotiations proceed to a
productive conclusion,” said David Per-
due, the Georgia senator and cousin of
Sonny Perdue, the US agriculture secre-
tary, adding that the US president
“deserves high marks for standing up
for American workers, farmers, and
manufacturers”.
If no breakthrough is reached in the
negotiations, further escalation is
already scheduled.
On October 1, the $250bn of Chinese
goods that have already been subject to
25 per cent levies will see those tariffs
rise to 30 per cent, further straining
both economies.
In mid-December, a new batch of Chi-
nese imports, worth $156bn, will be hit
by 15 per cent tariffs.
Last month r Trump ramped up theM
trade war, leading to a rapid cycle of tit-
for-tatescalations.
Additional reporting by Daniel Shane in
Hong Kong

Tariff wars


US and China agree to resume talks


If no breakthrough takes


place, further escalation of


spat is already scheduled


Few expect
the two

countries to
move

quickly
back to the

position
they were in

last April
on the verge

of a deal


M I L E S J O H N S O N— ROME


Politicians in Brussels breathed asigh of
relief this week when a new Italian coali-
tion government came together, banish-
ing into opposition the anti-migration
and euro-antagonist Matteo Salvini and
his League party.
Butquestions remain n the future ofo
a p act between the Five Star movement
and its once swornenemy, the centre-
left Democraticparty (PD).
Will the new coalition, led by peo-“
ple’s lawyer” Giuseppe Conte, who con-
tinuesas prime minister, be able to navi-
gateadjustment to public finances this
autumn without triggering anotherrow
with the EU? And if the oalitionc cannot
hold together, will Mr Salvini’s eagueL
party be soon swept back into power?


Who are the main figures in the new
government?
Mr Conte’s previous cabinet dubbed
itself “the government of change”, but


was seen by pponents as a dangerouso
collection of financially reckless popu-
lists. The composition of the “Conte 2”
cabinet is likely to soothe the nerves of
those in Brussels who had feared further
confrontations with Mr Salvini.
The appointment of Roberto Gualtieri
as economy minister, a longstanding PD
member of the European Parliament
and chair of its committee on economic
and monetary affairs, has placed a Brus-
sels veteran in a critical post ahead of
Italy proposing its annual budget this
autumn.Mr Gualtieriis unlikely to find
his every move stalked by Mr Salvini,
although he may yet face criticism from
more radical Five Star figures.
The move by Luigi Di Maio,Five Star
leader, from joint-deputy prime minis-
ter to foreign minister may ave raisedh
eyebrows among Italy’s European allies.
Last year he triggered the mostseri-
ous diplomatic crisis etween Italy andb
France in modern history by offering
support to thegilets jaunes rotesters,p

prompting Emmanuel Macron, France’s
president, to recall his ambassador tem-
porarily from Rome.
Domestically, the appointment of the
independent “technocrat” Luciana
Lamorgese as the replacement for Mr
Salvini at the interior ministry is a ignals
the government wants to calm the het-r
oric on immigration of her predecessor.
Ms Lamorgese is a lawyer who,at the
interior ministry, has dealt with the
technical aspects of implementing
immigration policy. Sheis expected to
differ rom Mr Salvini in political style.f

What will the new government mean
for the economy and ties with the EU?
Investors in Italian government debt
have ignalleds hey believe the newt
government will be less immediately
threatening to the economy than the
last. The interest rate Italy pays to
borrow over 10 years compared to
what Germany pays this week fell to a
lower level than at any time since the

coalition took office in June last year.
Based on the personalities in the
Conte 2 cabinet, many observers believe
the government will take a far more
conciliatory position when dealing with
Brussels on issues such as public
finances and immigration. Mr Conte
had already served as a calmer interme-
diary with Brussels last year when Mr
Salvini was launching blistering tirades

against European interference in the
Italian budget. Now, with Mr Gualtieri
as economy minister, it appears com-
promise ill be the new strategy.w
A draft programme released hist
weeksignalled the new coalition would
try socially inclusive economic policies
whileemphasising financial stability.
The document saidit would promote
an expansionary fiscal policy but “with-
out undermining the balance of public
finances”. It would also try to promote
an agenda inside Europe that would
overcome “excessive rigidity” in EU
budgetary rules, and promote “not only
stability but growth”. Draft policies
include a new minimum wage, lower
taxes for workers, a “green new deal”, a
reform to rules on conflicts of interest,
and promoting a co-ordinated Euro-
pean response to managing migration.

How long could the new government
last, and what could cause it to fall?
Many, including Mr Salvini, predict that

their differences will mean the new coa-
lition cannot last for long.
Its most important hallenge will bec
to pass a budget for next year nd toa
make enough adjustments to avoid a
mandatory increase in VAT.
The governmentmust find €23bn in
savings r additional revenue to avoido
the taxrises.
Any painful spending adjustments
the new governmentmakes may pro-
voke a political reaction, heightening
the risk that the partiessplit rather than
risk owning the responsibility.

Is Matteo Salvini now locked out from
power for the foreseeable future?
Mr Salvini and his party have been
pushed into opposition. But it would be
unwise to write off the League leader.
Opinion polls showthe League is
still Italy’s most popular party, with
above 30 per cent support, and would
still be expected towin ny futurea
elections.

Italy’s coalitionQuestions mount on whether partnership will flourish or succumb to Salvini


LucianaLamorgeseandLuigi Di Maio
serve in the new coalition cabinet

G U Y C H A Z A N— BERLIN


“We plead with you, Chancellor Merkel:
Please help us!”
These were the words of Joshua Wong
and other leaders of the Hong Kong pro-
test movement in anopen letter ot
Angela Merkel published this week in
theBild newspaper, just days before
Angela Merkel’s 12th official trip to
China.
It was well timed. Ms Merkel is the
first important western leader to visit
Beijing since the unrest began in Hong
Kong. And the domestic pressure is
growing on her to use the trip to show
solidarity with the pro-democracy pro-
testers nd to warn Beijing of grave con-a
sequences if it intervenes militarily.
The protesters scored a big victory on
Wednesday whenCarrie Lam, Hong
Kong chief executive,withdrew het
extradition bill that would have allowed
criminal suspects to be transferred to
mainland China for the first time. But
her concession was rebuffed by activists
as “too little, too late”.
Ms Merkel’s response to the Wong let-
ter, in which he asked for a meeting with
the German leader during her trip to
China, was cool. Steffen Seibert, her
spokesman, said she had “taken note” of
it but had no plans to change her travel
plans and meet the activists.
He added that Germany wanted to see
a negotiated end to the unrest in Hong
Kong, which began as a protest against
the extradition bill but which has since
morphed into a broad campaign for
greater democracy.
“We are in favour of a solution that is
based on dialogue and non-violence,
[and] the laws that apply to the people
of Hong Kong,” he added. People there
had a “long tradition of the rule of law”,
which was anchored in the “one coun-
try, two systems” Basic Law of 1997.
“That should, in our view, be the basis of
dialogue and rapprochement.”
Thatresponse reflects the bind Ms
Merkel is in. Ties with China are of the
utmost importance to Berlin, and Ms
Merkel’s government is at pains
to preserve a close rela-
tionship, especially at a
time when its econ-
o m y a p p e a r s t o


beheading for recession, buffeted by
fears of adisorderly Brexit nd thea
shockwaves of President Donald
Trump’s trade war with China.
In 2018, China was Germany’s biggest
trading partner for the third year run-
ning, with bilateral trade volume reach-
ing €199bn, a 6 per cent increase on


  1. Meanwhile, German investment
    in China rose from €30bn in 2010 to
    €81bn in 2017. China is by far the most
    important market for Germany’s big
    carmakers, and Ms Merkel will be
    accompanied on her trip by some of
    those bosses, as well as chief executives
    from the semiconductor, logistics,
    financial services and energy industries.
    Butshe hasfaced accusations from
    campaigners and opposition MPs that
    she has toned down her criticism of
    human rights abuses in China, such as
    the internment of some 1.5m Uighur
    Muslims in detention camps in Xin-
    jiang, for fear of harming the trad-
    ing relationship with Beijing.
    “Too often in the past the


German government has stayed silent
when it should have addressed undemo-
cratic developments,” said Omid
Nouripour, an MP who is the Greens’
spokesman on foreign affairs.
Berlin denies it is soft on China. “We
want [our two countries] to remain in
dialogue with each other... but a dia-
logue must allow for criticism,” said one
senior official.
Though she will not be meeting Mr
Wong, he stressed that Ms Merkel will
have several encounters with Chinese
civil society as part of her trip, including
a discussion with students at Wuhan
University.
Yet even from Ms Merkel’s own party,
the Christian Democratic Union, there
have been calls for her to get tough with
Beijing. Marian Wendt, a CDU MP, said
Germany should resist “kowtowing” to
China and insistit live up to its commit-
ment to the “one country, two systems”
approach that guarantees the rights and
freedoms of Hong Kong’s population.
“We should not shrink from clear

demands, for example on human rights,
out of our supposed economic inter-
ests,” he told the Rheinische Post.
A similar message came from the
Social Democrats, Ms Merkel’s junior
coalition partner. Nils Schmid, the SPD’s
foreign affairs spokesman said the chan-
cellor should make it “abundantly
clear” to the Chinese that Germany
would “not accept” any attempt by Bei-
jing to use troops from the mainland to
violently suppress the protests.
Meanwhile, in Berlin, the talk was all
of Mr Wong’s letter. In it, he appealed to
Ms Merkel to convey to the Chinese
leadership the protesters’ demands,
such as an independent inquiry into
police brutality. “You grew up in [com-
munist] East Germany,” he wrote. “You
experienced directly the terrors of a dic-
tatorial regime... We wish you would
show the same courage and determina-
tion against criminal authoritarian
regimes, which inspired Germany and
Europe before the end of the cold war.”
Editorial Comment age 8p

Sino-German ties. fficial visitO


Merkel faces Hong Kong dilemma in Beijing


Cross-party calls for chancellor


to get tough on China and


show solidarity with protesters


Angela Merkel:
under pressure
before meeting
President Xi
Jinping, below
Jens Büttner/Picture
Alliance/DPA

SEPTEMBER 6 2019 Section:World Time: 5/9/2019- 18:12 User:john.conlon Page Name:WORLD3 USA, Part,Page,Edition:USA, 4, 1

Free download pdf