The Wall Street Journal - 07.09.2019 - 08.09.2019

(Barré) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. ** Saturday/Sunday, September 7 - 8, 2019 |B


tors and industry analysts
about whether Nucor should
delay some of the expansions
until market conditions and
steel prices improve.
Most of the company’s ex-
pansions and new facilities are
scheduled to begin operating
in 2021 and 2022.
Nucor’s shares fell 0.56% to
$50.07 on Friday. The stock is
down nearly 21% over the past

year.
Mr. Topalian joined Nucor
23 years ago and was pro-
moted to executive vice presi-
dent two years ago. He will
serve as president and chief
operating officer until moving
into the CEO job Jan. 1. Mr.
Ferriola, 67, is also chairman
of the board. A Nucor spokes-
woman said a decision about
that post hasn’t been made.

A mechanic for American
Airlines Group
Inc. is accused
of trying to sabotage a plane
just before it was scheduled to
carry 150 passengers from Mi-
ami to the Bahamas in July.
The mechanic, Abdul-Ma-
jeed Marouf Ahmed Alani, told
federal investigators that he
superglued a piece of foam to
block a module that reports
speed, pitch and other critical
flight data, according to an af-
fidavit filed in U.S. District
Court in Miami on Thursday.
American and its mechanics
are in the middle of conten-
tious contract negotiations.
The dispute has escalated,
with American suing the
unions that represent its me-
chanics and accusing them of
causing an operational crisis
by slowing down repairs and
refusing overtime. American
says the slowdown has caused
more than 1,200 delays and
cancellations.
Mr. Alani told investigators
that he was upset over the
contract negotiations—which
have dragged on since 2015—
and that the stalemate had af-
fected him financially, accord-
ing to the affidavit. The
company has said a new con-
tract would include wage in-
creases.
Mr. Alani claimed his goal
wasn’t to harm passengers but
rather to prompt a delay or
canceled flight in hopes that
he would receive overtime


work.
American Airlines Flight
2834 never took off. Pilots re-
ceived an error message when
they increased power to the
engines and then sent the
plane for an inspection, where
another mechanic discovered
the obstruction in the plane’s
air data module system. Amer-
ican put passengers on an-
other aircraft and notified fed-
eral law-enforcement officials,
a spokesman for the airline
said.
David Seymour, American’s
senior vice president of inte-
grated operations, described
the incident as “extremely se-
rious” in a message to employ-
ees.
“Fortunately, with appropri-
ate safety protocols and pro-
cesses, this individual’s ac-
tions were discovered and
mitigated before our aircraft
flew,” he wrote.
Investigators homed in on
Mr. Alani after reviewing
video footage of someone pull-
ing up next to the plane in a
white pickup truck and access-
ing a compartment under the
cockpit. Three other mechan-
ics helped identify him.
Mr. Alani has worked for
American since 1988, the car-
rier said, adding that he has
been suspended.
Mr. Alani was arrested
Thursday and is being charged
by the U.S. Attorney’s Office
for the Southern District of
Florida with “willfully damag-
ing, destroying, or disabling
an aircraft,” according to court
documents. He appeared be-
fore a magistrate judge Friday,
but no plea was entered. His
next scheduled appearance on
the government’s request for
pretrial detention is set for
Wednesday. An attorney for
Mr. Alani didn’t respond to re-
quests to comment.
Last month a federal judge
agreed with American that the
workers were deliberately
slowing down work and or-
dered them to stop. The car-
rier, which is based in Fort
Worth, Texas, has asked the
judge to sanction the unions.
The unions have denied the al-
legations and appealed the
ruling.
John Samuelsen, president
of the Transport Workers
Union, one of the bodies rep-
resenting American’s mechan-
ics, condemned the alleged
tampering.
“The Transport Workers
Union is shocked by the re-
ported allegations of airplane
sabotage by an employee,” Mr.
Samuelsen said.


BYALISONSIDER


Mechanic


Accused of


Sabotaging


Jetliner


Suspect told


investigators he was


upset over contract


negotiations.


BUSINESS & FINANCE NEWS


of its enterprise business to
Broadcom Inc. Such a struc-
ture could reduce the tax bill
for its shareholders, the peo-
ple said.
It couldn’t be learned how
exactly this deal would work
and it is far from guaranteed
it will happen. If it does, it
could involve the firms buying
Symantec and proceeding with
the sale to Broadcom or wait-
ing for the enterprise deal to
close and then acquiring the
consumer unit, which includes
Norton antivirus and LifeLock
identity-theft-protection prod-
ucts.
Selling a company when a
major transaction like the

Broadcom deal is about to
close would be complicated
and unusual.
Symantec last month said it
would sell its enterprise-secu-
rity business to Broadcom, a
major chip and software pro-
ducer, for $10.7 billion. Syman-
tec plans to distribute pro-
ceeds in a special dividend of
$12 a share after the deal
closes, expected by the end of
the year.
It also said it would boost a
stock-repurchase program.
The stock had risen roughly
16% to $23.70 since The Wall
Street Journal reported on the
deal with Broadcom, giving
Symantec a market value of

roughly $14.5 billion.Symantec
shares rose about 4.5% on Fri-
day.
A deal at $26 or $27 a
share would value Symantec at
about $16.4 billion.
The private-equity firms
believe the extra premium is
justified by what they see as
the tax inefficiency of the deal
with Broadcom, which is ex-
pected to trigger steep divi-
dend-tax payments for share-
holders related to the special
payout, the people familiar
with the matter said.
Broadcom had earlier this
year considered a deal for all
of Symantec and was close to
reaching one before the talks

fell apart. Permira and Advent
also previously considered
such a deal.
The enterprise unit serves
businesses and has helped
make Symantec the world’s
largest seller of security soft-
ware for corporate networks,
though the consumer opera-
tion is more profitable.
Last week, Symantec said
interim Chief Executive Rich-
ard Hill would resign following
the sale to Broadcom and initi-
ated a search for his successor.
Symantec a year ago drew the
attention of activist investor
Starboard Value LP, which
struck a settlement for board
seats.

Symantec Corp. received
interest from a pair of private-
equity suitors seeking to buy
the cybersecurity firm for
more than $16 billion after it
agreed to a sale of a big chunk
of its business, according to
people familiar with the mat-
ter.
Permira and Advent Inter-
national Corp. recently ap-
proached Symantec proposing
a takeover deal valuing Sy-
mantec at $26 to $27 a share
that would hand them the
company’s consumer opera-
tion while preserving the sale

BYCARALOMBARDO
ANDDANACIMILLUCA

Buyout Firms Size Up Symantec


SACRAMENTO, Calif.—
PG&E Corp.’s last-minute push
for legislation to help it pay
off billions of dollars in wild-
fire claims fell apart Friday as
the California lawmaker who
authored the measure said he
would shelve the proposal for
the year.
The bill, by Republican As-
semblyman Chad Mayes,
would have given the bankrupt
utility giant access to as much
as $20 billion in tax-exempt
state bonds backed by share-
holder profits. Mr. Mayes said
in an interview Friday that he
expects to make the proposal a
“two year bill,” meaning it
wouldn’t go up for a vote be-
fore California’s legislative
session ends next week. In-
stead, it could be considered
again in 2020.
Mr. Mayes said the proposal
needs more debate and more
time for discussion.
“It’s really important for us
to get this right. This is a ma-
jor piece of policy, it needs full
sunlight, it needs full trans-
parency, and it takes time to
do this,” Mr. Mayes said.
“Could it be done? It could,
but we are running out of
time.”
PG&E for weeks had been
lobbying lawmakers to pass
the legislation, arguing that
quick access to the bond
money is critical to its effort
to settle wildfire claims and
emerge from bankruptcy court
by next summer. PG&E sought
chapter 11 bankruptcy protec-
tion in January, citing more
than $30 billion in potential li-
ability costs tied to its role in
starting a series of wildfires in
2017 and 2018.
In a statement, PG&E said:
“We firmly believe that Wild-
fire Victim Recovery Bonds are

a critical element to the state’s
path forward when it comes to
addressing wildfire risk. We’re
pleased to see policy makers
acknowledge the merits of this
proposal and look forward to
lawmakers considering it in
January as a balanced ap-
proach that prioritizes and
protects both wildfire victims
and customers.”
California lawmakers in
July passed legislation creat-
ing a fund to help the state’s
largest utilities handle wildfire
liability costs going forward.
PG&E is required to exit bank-
ruptcy by June 30, 2020, to
participate in it.

The separate bond measure,
however, failed to gain trac-
tion, with few legislators in
California’s large Democratic
caucus eager to support a bill
that could be viewed as a bail-
out of the unpopular company.
PG&E said it would repay the
bonds with future profits, not
rate increases, but the legisla-
tion still triggered backlash
from consumer advocates and
a group of bondholders with
other plans. Some particularly
objected to the attempt to
rush the bill through in the
last few weeks of the legisla-
tive session.
The measure’s failure com-

plicates PG&E’s push to devise
a restructuring plan, which it
intends to submit to the court
by Monday. The judge oversee-
ing the bankruptcy case last
month affirmed the company’s
exclusive right to craft that
framework as bondholders and
insurers pushed to file their
own plans.
PG&E’s largest shareholders
last month proposed raising as
much as $15 billion in equity
and $5 billion in debt to sup-
port the plan, according to
regulatory filings. Without the
state bonds, the company will
likely have to seek additional
capital.

The company’s total liabil-
ity burden remains in flux
amid new questions about
whether it could be held re-
sponsible for the 2017 Tubbs
Fire in Northern California’s
wine country, the second-
worst wildfire in state history.
California fire investigators
earlier this year said PG&E’s
equipment didn’t cause that
fire, but attorneys represent-
ing fire victims strongly dis-
pute that finding and per-
suaded the bankruptcy judge
to permit a state civil trial on
the issue, a case that could
add billions of dollars to its
total obligations.

BYALEJANDROLAZO
ANDKATHERINEBLUNT

PG&E Suffers Setback on Help for Wildfire Claims


Nucor Corp. said Chief Ex-
ecutive John Ferriola will re-
tire at the end of the year and
be succeeded by veteran exec-
utive Leon Topalian, as the
largest U.S. steelmaker navi-
gates weakening demand from
a decelerating industrial sec-
tor.
Mr. Ferriola, chief executive
of the Charlotte, N.C., com-
pany since 2013, has been a
staunch advocate of tariffs on
imported steel that the Trump
administration implemented
last year.
The 25% duty imposed on
most imported steel in March
2018 drove up steel prices and
swelled Nucor’s profit in the
months that followed.
But steel prices have fallen
in the past year as manufac-
turing activity has slowed and
customers work through their
inventories rather than buy
more steel.
The benchmark price of
hot-rolled sheet is down more
than 35% to $575 a ton from a
peak last July.
Falling prices contributed
to a 43% decline in Nucor’s
second-quarter profit. The
company in July reported steel
shipments during the quarter
slipped 7% from last year.
Nucor has pressed ahead
with an aggressive build-out
of its steelmaking capacity.
The company earlier this
year said it would spend $2.
billion to expand and upgrade
mills including a new plant in
Kentucky. The company also is
expanding in Mexico under a
joint venture with a Japanese
steelmaker.
Mr. Topalian, 51 years old,
will face questions from inves-

BYBOBTITA

Nucor CEO Will Retire


Steel prices have fallen in the past year as manufacturing slowed.

TIMOTHY D. EASLEY/ASSOCIATED PRESS

A California lawmaker said more discussion is needed on his bill to give the utility access to up to $20 billion in tax-exempt state bonds.

JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES

Coats warned that the nation’s
electric grid and gas pipelines
are in the crosshairs of foreign
adversaries.
“China has the ability to
launch cyberattacks that cause
localized, temporary disruptive
effects on critical infrastruc-
ture,” he said at the time, and
Russia “is now staging cyberat-
tack assets to allow it to dis-
rupt or damage U.S. civilian
and military infrastructure dur-
ing a crisis.”
Michael Mabee, a New
Hampshire security blogger,
said that “getting the names of
the violators is a huge victory,”
but he wants to know the iden-
tities of past violators too, and
doesn’t think that information
should be withheld because
vulnerabilities are required to
be fixed, when discovered.
Mr. Mabee previously filed
Freedom of Information Act re-
quests for the release of unre-
dacted penalty case documents,
believing that public attention
will make utilities focus harder
on security.
A U.S. Army veteran, Mr.
Mabee said he was sensitized
to the importance of a secure
electric grid after seeing what
happens when a society suffers
protracted blackouts and wor-
ries that U.S. utilities are lax
about protecting their assets
against attack. He said that
lengthy blackouts tear at social
structures, and said he wit-
nessed the effects in two tours
of duty in Iraq, in providing hu-
manitarian assistance to Guate-
mala after a hurricane and af-
ter being in Manhattan during
the terrorist attacks of 2001
and in the Northeast after a
major blackout in 2003.

Regulators are weighing
whether to disclose the identi-
ties of electric utilities that vio-
late rules designed to protect
the nation’s grid against cyber
and physical attacks.
The Federal Energy Regula-
tory Commission’s current
practice is to provide the public
general information about fed-
eral rule violations and penal-
ties levied—but not to name
the companies that broke the
rules.
The commission said late
last month it has received an
unprecedented number of re-
quests for nonpublic identifying
information, and it is seeking
public comment until Sept. 26
on a proposal to release viola-
tors’ names in the future.
FERC said its current prac-
tice “may not be achieving an
appropriate balance of security
and transparency.”
The commission said if it
releases identities, it might
hold back more of the details of
cases, so that adversaries won’t
get information they could use
to target companies’ prior ar-
eas of weakness. Organizations
that represent utilities likely
will oppose moves to expose
the identity of companies that
have security lapses.
Since 2008, when the first
set of Critical Infrastructure
Protection rules took effect,
there have been about 250 pen-
alty federal cases brought
against electric utilities. But it
is impossible for the public to
tell which companies have the
best and worst records.
Earlier this year, then-Na-
tional Intelligence Director Dan

BYREBECCASMITH

Agency Weighs Outing


Utilities Over Lapses

Free download pdf