MIT Sloan Management Review Fall 2019

(Wang) #1

12 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW FALL 2019 SLOANREVIEW.MIT.EDU


REFERENCES


  1. See, for example, L.A. Bettencourt, “Cus-
    tomer Voluntary Performance: Customers as
    Partners in Service Delivery,” Journal of Retail-
    ing 73, no. 3 (1997): 383-406; and B. Schneider
    and D.E. Bowen, Winning the Service Game
    (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1995).

  2. A.B. Eisingerich, S. Auh, and O. Merlo, “Acta
    Non Verba? The Role of Customer Participation
    and Word of Mouth in the Relationship Be-
    tween Service Firms’ Customer Satisfaction
    and Sales Performance,” Journal of Service
    Research 17, no. 1 (2013): 40-53.

  3. Our research spanned seven types of
    service organizations (e-commerce, airlines,
    financial services, legal services, hospitality,
    retail, and information technology) across four
    continents (North America, Europe, Asia, and
    Australia). Interviews were analyzed using
    NVivo data analysis software. We also incorpo-
    rated ethnographic insights from the airline
    industry at the front-line and senior executive
    levels, based on years of professional experi-
    ence in the industry. The research team
    included a longtime flight attendant for a
    global Asian airline and a recently retired
    senior executive at a major U.S. airline.

  4. E.L. Deci, R. Koestner, and R.M. Ryan,
    “A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments
    Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on
    Intrinsic Motivation,” Psychological Bulletin 125,
    no. 6 (November 1999): 627-668.

  5. Research shows that front-line employees
    whose compensation is linked to customer
    participation initiatives experience higher levels
    of job-related stress and dissatisfaction and are
    more likely to leave the company within the
    next six months. See B. Benjamin, P. Gochyyev,
    E. Sopadjieva, et al., “Learning Before Earning:
    How to Incentivize Frontline Employees to
    Deliver Great Customer Experiences,” white
    paper, Medallia Institute, New York, 2016,
    https://go.medallia.com.

  6. K. Blanchard and C. Barrett, Lead With LUV:
    A Different Way to Create Real Success (Upper
    Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education,
    2011).

  7. A. Song, “Call Center Workers’ Right to Hang
    Up on Unruly Customers,” Nov. 17, 2017, http://
    koreabizwire.com.

  8. The campaign included videos that were made
    available in the public domain, such as “I Am Your
    Energy,” YouTube video, 2:50, GS Caltex, Aug.
    23, 2017, https://youtu.be/mr7p_cmH2H8.

  9. Email exchanges with Gregg Saretsky on
    June 28, 2018, and July 10, 2019.


Reprint 61111. For ordering information, see page 4.
Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology,


  1. All rights reserved.


FRONTIERS


playing sound bites taken from a social
media campaign launched by energy firm
GS Caltex, which featured abusive cus-
tomers followed by the voice-over, “You
are about to be served by my beloved
mum/father, daughter/son. ... Please talk
to her/him nicely.”^8



  1. Treat external and internal partici-
    pation as equally important. Despite the
    challenges and complexities of using
    customer input, we think deciding not to


use any would be the wrong solution. In
particular, positive customer feedback can
enrich managers’ insight into how em-
ployees are performing. In our study, for
example, we encountered service provid-
ers such as lawyers who were extremely
well liked by their clients. However, they
felt unappreciated and alienated from
the business when it seemed managers
focused mainly on the billable hours that
were racked up at the end of the month. If
these managers had also considered what
clients had to say, they could have gained
a more nuanced understanding of who
their biggest rainmakers were and moti-
vated those employees to build on their
strong customer relationships.
This argues for a balanced approach
that blends customers’ outside view with
employees’ internal perspective. WestJet,
a discount Canadian airline, provides a
good example. When the company was
considering starting a new regional airline,
then-CEO Gregg Saretsky thought it


would be valuable to solicit input from
both customers and employees. I n addi-
tion to conducting market research and
holding meetings with community leaders
in cities across Canada, WestJet leadership
held town-hall-style meetings where em-
ployees were invited to express their views.
Ultimately, more than 90% of employees
backed the new venture. Saretsky attrib-
uted the employee support at least partly
to their sense of feeling valued. The key

to getting things right, Saretsky told us,
is ensuring “that employees have enough
information, a formal vehicle to provide
input, and a feedback loop that apprises
them of the actions that resulted from
their — and their customers’ — input.”^9

MANAGING FRONT-LINE employees
in ways that help companies establish
profitable customer relationships can be
challenging. Although organizations want
workers to support company goals and put
the interests of the business ahead of their
own, managers’ efforts can easily backfire
if they disregard employees’ needs. The
guidelines we have put forward can help
companies strike a productive balance.

Omar Merlo is an assistant professor of mar-
keting, Andreas B. Eisingerich a professor of
marketing, and Hae-Kyung Shin a research
associate at Imperial College Business
School in London. Robert A. Britton is an
adjunct professor at Georgetown University.
Comment on this article at http://sloanreview
.mit.edu/x/61111.

Avoiding the Pitfalls of Customer Participation (Continued from page 11)


A social media campaign launched by
GS Caltex featured sound bites from
abusive customers followed by the
voice-over, “You are about to be served
by my beloved mum/father, daughter/
son. ... Please talk to her/him nicely.”
Free download pdf