Karen_A._Mingst,_Ivan_M._Arregu_n-Toft]_Essentia

(Amelia) #1
Notes A9


  1. Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International
    Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).

  2. This section on NGOs draws on Karns and Mingst, International Organ izations, 3rd ed., chap. 6.

  3. Maria Ivanova, “The Contested Legacy of Rio + 20 ,” Global Environmental Politics 13:4
    (November 2013): 4.

  4. See Alexander Cooley and James Ron, “The NGO Scramble: Or gan i za tional Insecurity and
    the Po liti cal Economy of Transnational Action,” International Security 27:1 (Summer 2002):
    5 –39.

  5. See, for example, William DeMars, NGOs and Transnational Networks: Wild Cards in World
    Politics (London: Pluto, 2005); Volker Heins, Nongovernmental Organ izations in International
    Society: Strug gles over Recognition (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

  6. Fiona Terry, Condemned to Repeat? The Paradox of Humanitarian Action (Ithaca, NY: Cornell
    University Press, 2002); and Sarah Kenyon Lischer, “Military Intervention and the Humanitarian
    ‘Force Multiplier,’ ” Global Governance 13:1 (January– March 2007): 99–118.

  7. For pathbreaking theoretical and empirical work, see Martha Finnemore, National Interests
    in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996) and Finnemore, The
    Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
    Press, 2003); and Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy
    Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).

  8. Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore, Rules for the World: International Organ izations in
    Global Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004). Also Barnett and Finnemore,
    “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organ izations,” International Or ga ni za­
    tion 53:4 (Autumn): 699–732.


Chapter 08


  1. Data on war frequency and number of deaths can be found in several, sometimes divergent,
    sources. These include Quincy Wright, A Study of War, rev. ed., 2 vols. (Chicago: University of
    Chicago Press, 1942, 1965); J. David Singer and Melvin Small, The Wages of War, 1816–1965:
    Statistical Handbook (New York: Wiley, 1972); Jack S. Levy, War in the Modern Great Power
    System , 1495 –1975 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983); Ruth Leger Sivard, World
    Military and Social Expenditures, 1996 (Washington, DC: World Priorities, 1996); Human
    Security Group, “The Human Security Report 2012,” www. hsrgroup. org / human - security

    • reports / 2012 / overview. aspx (accessed 2/27/13); and Human Security Report Proj ect
      (March 2015), www. hsrgroup. org.



  2. Charles Tilly, “Reflections on the History of Eu ro pean State- Making,” in The Making of
    National States in Western Eu rope (Prince ton, NJ: Prince ton University Press, 1975), p. 42.

  3. John Mueller, “The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World,”
    International Security 13:2 (Fall 1988): 55–79; and Mueller, Retreat from Doomsday: The
    Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989). See also Gregg Easterbrook, “The
    End of War?” New Republic, May 30, 2005, 18–21.

  4. See Joshua S. Goldstein, Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide
    (New York: Dutton, 2011); and Robert Jervis, “Theories of War in an Era of Leading Power
    Peace,” American Po liti cal Science Review 96:1 (March 2002): 1–14.


ESSIR7_CH12_Notes_A1-A16_11P.indd 9 6/14/16 10:12 AM

Free download pdf