Chapter 6
Health and Life- Satisfaction
Does the picture change if, instead of focusing on misery, we
analyze everything in terms of its impact on the full range
of life- satisfaction, measured 0– 10? What role does health
play in determining this? Table 6.3 gives the answer. It uses
the same definitions of the right- hand variables as in Table
6.2, and the results are essentially the same as when the de-
pendent variable was binary (“miserable” or otherwise).^12 As
before, we are looking at the effect of each factor holding all
other factors constant. In all the countries differences in men-
tal health explain more of the variance of human experience
than differences in income or employment status. Mental
illness also explains more of the variation in the quality of
human life than does the variation in physical health.
Some people may instinctively feel that income and un-
employment must be more important. Don’t they, after all,
cause a lot of mental illness? To see the effects of poverty and
unemployment including their effects via mental illness, we
can simply omit mental illness from the equation. The effects
of income and unemployment barely increase, because their
correlation with mental illness is actually not that high.^13
Table 6.2. How misery is affected by adult outcomes
(cross- section) (β- coefficients)
USA Australia
Britain
BCS
Britain
BHPS
Income (log) −0.12 (.00) −0.09 (.02) −0.05 (.01) −0.07 (.01)
Unemployed 0.06 (.00) 0.06 (.01) 0.03 (.02) 0.07 (.00)
Physical illness 0.05 (.00) 0.16 (.02)* 0.05 (.01) 0.09 (.01)
Mental illness 0.19 (.00) 0.14 (.01) 0.09 (.01) 0.26 (.00)*