The Guardian - 30.08.2019

(Michael S) #1

Section:GDN 1N PaGe:5 Edition Date:190830 Edition:01 Zone: Sent at 29/8/2019 20:57 cYanmaGentaYellowbl


Friday 30 Aug ust 2019 The Guardian •


5

Source: Deutsche Bank

50%
Successful no confidence vote

30%
Unity government; new elections

30%
No deal Brexit then snap election

10%
Renegotiated Johnson deal ratified

5%
Parliament blocks
no deal Brexit.
Election pre 31 October

5%
Parliament blocks
no deal Brexit.
Article 50 extension

20%
No unity government; no deal Brexit

50%
Other scenarios

Deutsche Bank analysts have estimated the percentage
Momentum likelihood of various Brexit outcomes
Call for street protests

Momentum, the grassroots group
set up to support Jeremy Corbyn,
yesterday called for street protests
and road blockades to stop what it
calls a coup. Advocating action with
parallels to the Extinction Rebellion
environmental protests, Laura
Parker, the national coordinator,
said: “Our message to Johnson is
this: if you steal our democracy,
we’ll shut down the streets.”
Momentum, together with trade
unions, has organised protests
in Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool,
London, Manchester, Newcastle,
Nottingham, Oxford, Sheffi eld and
York on Saturday and a further
demonstration in London next
Tuesday when parliament returns.
“There are thousands of us
who will join an occupation of
parliament,” Parker said. By last
night a petition asking MPs to stop
the prorogation of parliament had
reached 1.5m signatories.

Sajid Javid
‘You don’t deliver on
democracy by trashing
democracy’
16 June

No comment
Yesterday

Amber Rudd
‘Nobody should consider
involving the Queen’

16 June

‘I’m here on a visit to work
out what’s going on in my
department’
Yesterday

Seeking answers, the Guardian
found a clutch of remain protesters
outside the Cabinet Offi ce , where
Gove was meeting union leaders
from Unite and the GMB to discuss
their concerns about a no-deal Brexit
on manufacturing. Unite the Union
assistant general secretary, Steve
Turner, condemned proroguing
parliament as an “outrage” and a
“silencing mechanism”.
Asked to clarify his position,
Gove’s spokesman pointed to
an i nterview the minister had
conducted with the BBC on
Wednesday. Pressed on whether
proroguing parliament was a
political attempt to stop debate
on Brexit and block MPs from
preventing the UK leaving the EU
without a deal, Gove replied: “It’s
certainly not. The prime minister
is clear that he wants to use a new
parliamentary session in order to
ensure that the people’s priorities
are met. It’s also the case that
parliamentarians will have plenty of
time when we come back next week
to debate Brexit.”


Amber Rudd
In June, the work and pensions
secretary described suspending
parliament as “absolutely
outrageous”. “To consider closing
parliament is the most extraordinary
idea I’ve ever heard,” she went on.
“It is a ridiculous suggestion. For a
start it would involve approaching
the Queen ... nobody should
consider doing that.”
Did she still think approaching the
Queen would be an outrage when
Jacob Rees-Mogg went to see her on
Wednesday? Such questions did not
seem to please her during a visit to
Belfast. Still, at least she retained a
laser focus on her day job.
Asked about proroguing
parliament, she replied: “I’m here
on a visit to work out what’s going
on in my department, how people
are helping people into work. And
what I’ve seen today has been really
reassuring.” Asked again about the
suspension of parliament as she
got into a waiting car, she said: “I’m
going to continue doing my job .”


Sajid Javid


The chancellor was fi ercely against
shutting down parliament during
the Tory leadership campaign,
saying: “You don’t deliver on
democracy by trashing democracy ...
we are not selecting a dictator of our
country.” But yesterday , Javid was
nowhere to be seen or heard.
A government spokesperson said
yesterday : “We are currently in the
longest parliamentary session in
almost 400 years and it’s crucial
that we put a bold and ambitious
domestic programme to MPs so that
we can deliver on people’s priorities
across the country.
“To do this we need a Queen’s
speech. This is about providing
parliament with a new legislative
programme that will help the NHS,
fi ght crime, invest in infrastructure
and cut the cost of living.”
The spokesperson added: “As we
have said previously, prorogation to
suspend parliament, to block MPs’
further consideration of Brexit is not
something we support.”

a parliamentary majority you control
everything, you control the timeta-
ble. There’s no written separation, so
... you pretty much are in command of
the whole thing. And we’ve suddenly
found ourselves with no majority and
a coalition and that’s not easy for our
system.” Downing Street later said
Wallace “misspoke”.
It is unclear how Johnson would
respond if an anti no-deal bill is passed,
mandating him to extend Article 50



  • but it is widely believed at Westmin-
    ster that No 10 is working up plans for
    a general election, after 31 October if
    possible, but beforehand if necessary.
    Cabinet ministers who had pre-
    viously been outspoken in their
    opposition to prorogation, including
    Amber Rudd and Matt Hancock, have
    been kept on board by the hope that
    Johnson can strike a reworked Brexit
    deal. They believe the real prospect
    of a no-deal Brexit will strengthen his
    hand in the negotiations – and then
    persuade sceptical Labour MPs to sup-
    port a deal, rather than risk crashing
    out on 31 October.
    According to a diplomatic note of
    Frost’s meeting in Brussels, seen by


the Guardian, he played down the sus-
pension of parliament, describing it as
normal. He also told his interlocutors
that Johnson wanted a deal, but was
not afraid of no deal.
The UK government appears to
be seeking to convince the EU that it
can bounce parliament into accept-
ing any re-written deal. Frost told EU
offi cials that it would be possible to
ratify a Brexit deal in the second half
of October and argued that a techni-
cal extension would not be necessary.
This strategy matches Johnson’s
pledge to leave the EU on 31 October
“do or die”.
EU diplomats remain sceptical that
a solution to the thorny question of
the Irish backstop can be devised in
62 days.
Amid nerves in Dublin, the EU’s
chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier
repeated his pledge that the bloc
would stand by Ireland. “In all circum-
stances, the EU will continue to protect
the interests of its citizens and compa-
nies, as well as the conditions for peace
and stability on the island of Ireland,”
he tweeted yesterday. “It is our duty &
our responsibility.”

 Continued from page 1

Top Tor ies pledge


rapid action to


avert no-deal Brexit


former business minister who quit
to support eff orts earlier this year
to stop no deal, confi rmed he would
vote with Tory rebels next week. Har-
rington, who announced yesterday
that he would quit the Commons at
the next election, said his decision was
to retire rather than a protest at Brexit,
but said he believed he needed to make
his intentions clear because of the pos-
sibility of a snap election.
Jonathan Djanogly, one of the MPs
who backed Theresa May’s deal as well
as eff orts to stop no deal, said he was
angered by the lack of opportunity for
scrutiny. “Legalities of shutting down
parliament apart, no deal has no dem-
ocratic backing so stopping debate on
the issue is morally wrong in my book,”
he said.
Guto Bebb, one of the handful of
Conservatives who have backed the
People’s Vote campaign, said: “As Con-
servatives we prize loyalty. But it has
become increasingly clear that our loy-
alty must be to our party’s long-term
values and not to the man who leads
the party at this time. I will be using
my vote in parliament next week to
do that. I know many of my Conserv-
ative colleagues, many of whom have
never before defi ed the offi cial whip
of the party leadership, will be doing
the same.”
Ministers privately admit the bid
to block anti no-deal legislation in the
Commons next week appears all but
lost, but eff orts to frustrate the rebels
are focusing on the House of Lords.
Opposition peers are expecting Tory
peers to attempt to talk out – or fi libus-
ter – the legislation, which will need to
have passed through all its parliamen-
tary stages and received royal assent
before parliament is suspended, or
it will fall. The Lib Dem leader in the
Lords, Dick Newby, insisted the gov-
ernment could be defeated.
“The government’s tactic to stop

the bill in the Lords could be to pack
it with hostile amendments and then
attempt to fi libuster the bill.
“On our side, we can interrupt and
put the amendments to a vote, and
depending on how many there are,
we could even sit all night every day
through Thursday, Friday, Saturday
and Sunday. We have the troops and
we have the camp beds – people will
be queuing up to stay,” he said.
Several Tories said they still wanted
to give Johnson time to get a deal
before they were prepared to vote
against him. Victoria Prentis said: “I
am still likely to give him the benefi t
of the doubt next week. He has prom-
ised that he will get a deal – I want to
give him the time to get a deal.”
Others who say they will continue
to back the prime minister include
Nicholas Soames, Richard Benyon and
Tobias Ell wood, all of whom have spo-
ken out against no deal.
Downing Street was bullish about
the government’s chances of over-
coming any legal or parliamentary
challenge. “We’ve been very clear
before that we will deliver Brexit by
any means necessary and that remains
the case,” a source said.
Labour meanwhile affirmed its
intention to play a central role in any
legislative fi ghtback. Corbyn told Sky
News: “We will be back in parliament
on Tuesday to challenge Boris Johnson
on what I think is a smash-and-grab
raid against our democracy. He’s trying
to suspend parliament in order to pre-
vent a serious discussion and a serious
debate to prevent a no-deal Brexit.”
Corbyn said he thought there was
enough time to introduce legislation :
“We believe we can do it, otherwise we
wouldn’t be trying to do it .”
Labour later released a joint state-
ment with the Scottish National party,
the Lib Dems, Plaid Cymru, the Inde-
pendent Group for Change and the
Green party. The group said: “It is our
view that there is a majority in the
House of Commons that does not sup-
port this prorogation, and we demand
that the prime minister reverses this
decision immediately .”

Journal Simon Jenkins Page 1 
Journal Leader comment Page 2 

RELEASED BY "What's News" vk.com/wsnws TELEGRAM: t.me/whatsnws
Free download pdf