Daily Mail - 28.08.2019

(Wang) #1

Daily Mail, Wednesday, August 28, 2019 Page 63


by Laxcgh dfgh dfhg

Toxic bond


boss signs


up ex-SFO


legal eagle


THE former top lawyer at
the Serious Fraud Office
(SFO) has been hired to
defend a businessman at
the centre of one of its most
high-profile cases.
Alun Milford, who was the
SFO’s general counsel,
joined law firm Kingsley
Napley in February.
It is representing Paul
Careless, 43, the marketing
boss at the centre of the
London Capital & Finance
(LCF) scandal being inves-
tigated by the SFO.
Careless’s firm, Surge
Financial, raked in huge
fees promoting toxic bonds
on behalf of LCF, which
went bust in January owing
£237m to 11,500 people.
That prompted the SFO
to launch a probe in March.
Careless has been arrested
and interviewed by police.
He denies any wrongdoing.
Milford, 54, was one of the
most senior figures at the
SFO before he left and in
his role would have involved
overseeing its cases.
He joined Kingsley Napley
in February, according to
filings on Companies House.
His appointment was not
referred to Whitehall’s advi-
sory committee on business
appointments, a spokes-
man confirmed. The SFO
declined to comment. Mil-
ford also declined to com-
ment last night.

P


ArTNErS at Deloitte are a
resilient bunch. They
haven’t let little things like
multiple reviews into the
shortcomings of audit in
the UK, or the huge fines they have
incurred for sub-standard work,
get in the way of their most lucra-
tive payday for ten years.
Top partners will receive an average of
just over £880,000 – not bad going for a
profession under such heavy fire.
It also puts in perspective some of the
recent fines for misconduct and ineptitude.
Deloitte’s latest disgrace is over its audit of
outsourcer Serco, which got into hot water
with the Serious Fraud Office after it
charged the authorities for putting elec-
tronic tags onto the ankles of prisoners who
were either back in jail, abroad or dead.
Auditors failed to stop these shenanigans
and as a consequence Deloitte was hit with
a £6.5m fine, along with a penalty of £150,000
slapped on partner Helen George.
These sound like painful sums, but they
aren’t, not really. That £6.5m – discounted
to £4.2m for settlement – is a tiny fraction of
Deloitte’s near £4bn revenues.
George’s fine, which was reduced to
£97,500, would be ruinous and life-altering

for most people. But assuming she took
home average partner pay or thereabouts,
she could have cleared it within months.
Deloitte’s results are accompanied by
lashings of ‘woke’ self-praise.
Dimple Agarwal, its managing partner for
people and purpose, explains how hard it is
working to increase the numbers of senior
women. More than 40pc of the 78 new part-
ners were female, which is laudable, pro-
vided they are better at auditing than
George and some of her male colleagues.
The insistence that it wants to change
and come up with an audit fit for the future
is undermined by its defence of the status
quo. The quality of its audits is, it claims,
‘considerably enhanced’ by being part of a
big diverse firm with money to invest.

Exactly the type of company it is now, in
other words: the type that produced audit
triumphs like Serco.
Auditors have adopted a tone of injured
self-righteousness and are full of reasons
why reforms will have unintended conse-
quences. It’s rather reminiscent of the
banks after the financial crisis and should
be viewed with similar scepticism.

Marks down
THE bottom of the blue-chip league table
reads like a roll call of corporate Britain.
Centrica, Direct Line, Kingfisher and the
supermarkets Sainsbury’s and Morrisons
are in the nether reaches of the FTSE 100.
Marks And Spencer, in the lowest place, is
on the brink of being kicked out. Whilst the
big domestic names huddle in the relega-
tion zone, the upper echelon is dominated
by globetrotters: the oil barons, the con-
sumer goods giants, the international
banks, drugs companies and miners.
What’s going on?
Although the Footsie is sometimes pre-
sented as a barometer of British business,
that is far from the truth.
Our flagship index has for a long time been
a home to companies from around the world
and in the main, that is a good thing.
At the moment, there is Brexit-related
wariness around UK-focused companies

and the weakness of sterling doesn’t help.
But there are other factors. In the case of
M&S, the blame can be pinned on the state
of the High Street and, more pertinently,
two decades of management failure, which
I hope will be reversed by the chairman,
Archie Norman, and his tie-up with Ocado.
Other laggards have their particular prob-
lems. These range from rising claims costs
and changes to the Ogden rate (used to
calculate personal injury payouts at Direct
Line) to the botched Asda merger which
has dented Sainsbury’s so badly.
Candidates for promotion next week
include russian metal producer Polymetal
and generic drugs business Hikma.
Another that might move up is Meggitt, a
Bournemouth engineering firm founded as
a machine tool operation just after the Sec-
ond World War, which has been out of the
FTSE 100 for almost four years.
That would be a welcome return for a Brit-
ish manufacturer, assuming it does not suf-
fer the same fate as Cobham and catch the
eye of an overseas predator.
The Footsie’s geographical diversity has
been a great strength, giving UK savers
exposure to some exciting investment
opportunities worldwide and shielding
them when the domestic economy is weak.
Even so, if Marks And Spencer does fall
out of the index after 35 unbroken years, it
will be a very sad day indeed.

Auditors are still cashing in


by Francesca Washtell

Mortgages’ 10-year high Harry Ramsden’s sold Astra drug on fast track


Ruth


Sunderland


BUSINESS EDITOR

Ministers


urged to probe


Cobham bid


THE battle for Cobham
has intensified after the head of
Parliament’s influential defence
committee urged the
Government to scrutinise the
£4bn takeover.
Conservative MP Julian Lewis
blasted Advent International’s bid
for the 85-year-old company as ‘the
latest in a series of disturbing devel-
opments’ for the defence industry.
Cobham’s board has backed the
165p-per-share deal but a growing
opposition wants the Government
and Defence Secretary Ben Wallace
to intervene.
Lewis told the Mail: ‘I would
strongly advise the Government to
have their tackle in order so that
they have a good explanation ready
as to why they’re prepared to allow
this latest shrinkage of the defence
industrial base.’
The defence committee launched
a review into defence industrial pol-
icy earlier this year to examine how
the sector can boost the UK.
Lewis added: ‘Any reduction in
British sovereignty over its defence
capabilities and its military indus-
trial resources is inherently undesir-
able. Clearly the secretary for
defence should take the closest
interest because he is certain to be
questioned upon it very closely in
the course of the inquiry.’
Cobham traces its history back to
1934 and pioneered technology
(pictured) that allows planes to
refuel while still in the air.
It now makes the technology for
use on Airbus planes and F-35 fight-
ers, and provides training services.
It is Britain’s third-largest defence
manufacturer and listed on the
FTSE 250 index. A sale to Advent
would take it off the stock market.
Criticism of the deal has been led
by the firm’s founding family since

the offer was revealed. Lady Cob-
ham, the widow of former chief
executive and chairman Sir Michael
Cobham, has written to Wallace
urging him to block the buyout.
Wallace has said he will ‘look into’
the concerns surrounding the deal.
The Liberal Democrats have
warned it is an example of ‘one of
the jewels in the crown of the UK’s
industrial base being sold on the
cheap’. And John Myers, who was a
director at Cobham subsidiary Fr
Aviation from 1988 to 2002, has said
the thought of the firm being ‘hived

off to an American company that
will basically tear it apart, is awful’.
But Cobham chief executive David
Lockwood has shrugged off con-
cerns as ‘noise’ it is ignoring, and
said the worries were unfounded.
Boston-based Advent has pledged
to invest in the firm, vowed to keep
its HQ in Dorset and only cut 1pc of
its 10,000-strong workforce,.
Cobham chairman Jamie Pike
said it was seeking higher offers
after its largest investor, US group
Silchester, said it was a cut-price
takeover. Cobham shares rose the

day the bid was announced, lifting
stock above the 165p offer price.
The firm has struggled and share-
holders stumped up £1bn in bail-
outs in 2016 and 2017. Cobham said:
‘We are providing extensive infor-
mation to support the Government
in assessing this transaction.’
Advent said: ‘We are in active dis-
cussions with business department
and the MoD, to ensure the acquisi-
tion of Cobham reflects its respon-
sible ownership principles and long-
standing support for maintaining
great British businesses.’

HARRY Ramsden’s has been
snapped up by a rival fish
and chip shop chain.
Deep Blue Restaurants,
part of the Boparan Res-
taurant Group, will take
over Harry Ramsden’s 34
sites, as well as its brand, in
a debt-free deal. It comes
after a slow decline for the
Yorkshire business, as the

casual dining sector fights
against rising costs and
fewer customers.
Harry Ramsden’s was
started 90 years ago in
West Yorkshire but has
struggled recently, after
falling to a £5m loss in its
most recently filed
accounts, and closing a
number of restaurants.

A DrUG developed by
Astrazeneca for treating
patients with chronic kid-
ney disease is to be fast-
tracked by US regulators.
The US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is
looking at Farxiga’s poten-
tial to prevent heart and
kidney failure in people with
and without type-2 diabe-
tes. The drug is already
approved for treatment of

people with type-2 diabe-
tes, the most common form
of the condition.
The fast-track designation
means regulators will make
a quicker decision on
whether to give regulatory
approval to the drug for
new uses. The FDA fast-
tracking could pave the
way for broader use of the
treatment – a change that
would lift sales.

THE number of mortgages
approved by banks is at its
highest rate in a decade.
A total of 95,126 mort-
gages were approved last
month, according to UK
Finance. This included
51,160 loans for home pur-
chases, 33,792 remortgages
and 10,174 other loans.
The number of loans for
homes was up 16.4pc from
43,967 during the same

month last year, while
remortgages had increased
by 19.4pc from 28,294.
The total number of mort-
gage approvals was the
highest since July 2009. The
value of loans was £26.1bn,
up from £25.4bn a year ago.
Experts suggested bor-
rowers were prompted to
act swiftly by the possibility
of a No Deal Brexit by Octo-
ber 31.
Free download pdf