USA Today International - 30.08.2019 - 01.09.2019

(vip2019) #1

NEWS USA TODAY❚ FRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 2019❚ 7A


Vice President/Local News and Audience Development: Amalie Nash
Vice President & Executive Editor/Investigations: Chris Davis
President, USA TODAY NETWORK Marketing Solutions: Kevin Gentzel

Gannett Company Interim
Chief Operating Officer
BARBARA WALL

USA TODAY Publisher
President, USA TODAY NETWORK
MARIBEL PEREZ WADSWORTH

Executive Editor/News: Jeff Taylor
Executive Editor/Audience: Patty Michalski
Editorial Page Editor: Bill Sternberg

USA TODAY
Editor in Chief
NICOLE CARROLL

“USA TODAY hopes to serve as a forum for better understanding and unity to help make the USA truly one nation.” – Allen H. Neuharth, Founder, Sept. 15, 1982

OPINION


MIKE THOMPSON/USA TODAY NETWORK

For all of us concerned about the era-
sure of civility in this country, have no
fear, because there’s a new super hero
on the scene. A friend asked me the
other day whether I could guess which
politician is launching a civility initia-
tive. Put that way, the sure fire answer
had to be President Donald Trump.
Wrong, he shouted. It’s Chris Christie!
“Whoa, of course!” I replied, "That
makes perfect sense."
After all, Christie, the bombastic for-
mer governor of New Jersey, is certainly
known for “bridging divides.” Remem-
ber “Bridgegate” — when a member of
his staff and several of his political ap-
pointees colluded to create traffic jams
in New Jersey by closing lanes at the
main toll plaza of the George Washing-
ton Bridge. He’s also known for a long
history of name-calling and bullying,
which — natch — makes him the right
choice to lead The Christie Institute of
Public Policy.
The stain to Christie’s reputation
from Bridgegate helped tank his bid for
the 2016 Republican nomination for
president, with the former governor
even citing the scandal as “a factor” in
why Donald Trump skipped over him
as a candidate for veep.
With news of the institute, Twitter
roared to life with flashbacks to many
of the ex-governor’s best hits. Among
those insults: “Take a bat to her,” in ref-
erence to state Sen. Loretta Weinberg
in 2011, when she was 76. “Your rear
end’s going to get thrown in jail, idiot,”
to a former Navy SEAL. “Are you stu-
pid? ... I’m sorry for the idiot over there,”
to a journalist. “Sit down and shut up,”
to a protester asking the governor about
the distribution of Hurricane Sandy
aid. And — of course — “numb nuts,” to
a gay New Jersey lawmaker.
Fast-forward to last week and listen
to Christie bemoan the political land-
scape. “Our politics have gotten so ugly
and divisive in the country that people
are not having civilized conversations,”
he told NJ Advance Media, taking no
responsibility for his role in helping to
create this crisis in civility.
Even with 20/20 hindsight, Christie,

who maintains a “close friendship”
with Trump, defended the president
who threw him under the bus. “I think
the negative tone in our politics existed
long before Donald Trump,” he has
been quoted as saying. “You’re never
going to agree with anyone 100% of the
time, and I have a lot of Democrat
friends who are using a lot of language
that is very hot.”
If I may, Governor, let me remind you
that civil discourse does not require
people to agree with each other. That is
actually un-American, a limit to our be-
lief in free speech. It does, however, ask
us to listen with open ears, and it does
prohibit bullying and name-calling.
“Civility does not mean appease-
ment or avoiding important differ-
ences. It means listening and talking
about those differences with respect,”
says Carolyn Lukensmeyer, the former
executive director of the nonprofit,
nonpartisan National Institute for Civil
Discourse.
Nowhere in recent interviews with
Christie does the word “respect” ap-
pear. That’s telling. But then, his past
bad behavior really tells us all we need
to know — that The Christie Institute of
Public Policy is a poorly veiled attempt
to rebrand New Jersey’s most bombas-
tic governor as a leader who seeks “to
bring people together, not drive them
apart,” as he told NJ.com.
Still, there’s some hope on the civili-
ty front.
Cindy McCain, the wife of the late
Republican Sen. John McCain, used the
one-year anniversary of his death this
week to encourage Americans to be
more civil. “We’re missing John’s voice
of reason right now in so many ways,”
McCain told NPR, referencing her late
husband’s friendships with Democrats
like former Vice President Joe Biden.
In a YouTube video, McCain urged
people “to join together across the aisle
— or whatever divides us — to make our
world a better place.”
She asked viewers to post about
their experiences using #ActsofCivili-
ty. She said, “Agree to disagree, but just
be civil about it.”
That’s an initiative I can get behind.

Steven Petrow is the host of “The Ci-
vilist,” a new podcast produced by PRI
and WUNC that discusses today’s
toughest political and social issues.

Look who’s seeking


civility: Chris Christie!


Ex-governor of N.J.


certainly knows bridges


Steven Petrow

YOUR SAY


Wanda Tucker’s poignant ancestral
story involving America’s first slaves
and Angola is another compelling rea-
son why there should be centers in ev-
ery state for the American promise of
equal justice under the law. William
Tucker, the first named African born
here, has every right to be recognized as
a forefather.
“Equal justice under law,” the phrase


above the entrance to the United States
Supreme Court that was approved by its
chief justice in 1932, is the essence of the
meaning behind cries like “I can’t
breathe” and “Hands up, don’t shoot”
that have accompanied the Black Lives
Matter movement and also captures
what’s at the heart of the #MeToo
movement.
It may be too late for Tamir Rice, Mi-
chael Brown, John Crawford III and
countless others, including enormous
numbers of women whose treatment in

the workplace has been anything but
just, to gain equality.
Perhaps the NFL or NBA, since they
have the financial resources and plenty
of players committed to the cause of jus-
tice, can lead our nation by opening a
center for equal justice under law in
each city with a team.
In the meantime, let us hope that our
Constitution and our free press, and
therefore justice, prevail.
Lou Horwitz
St. Peters, Mo.

Wanda Tucker is an inspiration. This
story brought me to tears. Thank you for
lifting up this story and recounting his-
tory.
Camille Manning-Broome

Project that chronicles slave history shows we must recognize all US forefathers


LETTERS
[email protected]

WANT TO COMMENT?Have Your Say at
[email protected], @usatodayopinion on
Twitter and facbook.com/usatodayopinion. Com-
ments are edited for length and clarity. Content
submitted to USA TODAY may appear in print,
digital or other forms. For letters, include name,
address and phone number. Letters may be mailed
to 7950 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA, 22108.

The Business Roundtable, an associ-
ation of senior corporate executives, is
worried about growing populist and
anti-business sentiments.
Last week, it released a statement
saying that corporations need to focus
on broad societal issues that go beyond
shareholder returns. Some of these in-
clude treating employees better and
supporting the communities in which
companies operate.
It’s not hard to see why the Round-
table would do this. Four in 10 Ameri-
cans now embrace some form of social-
ism. Many others back a president who
bashes free trade, politicizes monetary
policy, and rewards or punishes busi-
nesses based on their political fealty.
The Roundtable should be com-
mended for realizing that it can’t take
support for capitalism for granted. It
has more work to do, however, starting
with an acknowledgement that Sen.
Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and President
Donald Trump aren’t the biggest
threats to capitalism. Capitalists are.
To be sure, capitalism, or free enter-
prise as it is more generously called,
has been very good to America and the
world. In the past century, it has creat-
ed educated middle classes and lifted
billions of people out of poverty. Its
track record is far superior to that of
communism or socialism. But capital-
ism, particularly unfettered capitalism,
has a dark side.
When Americans look at U.S. busi-
ness circa 2019, they don’t see rising
wages. They see income inequality.
They see CEOs who rationalize their
seven-figure salaries by slashing jobs;
banks and brokerages that routinely
sell out their customers; blue-chip
companies that promote dangerously
addictive opioids; fossil fuel interests
that endanger the planet; and a cruel,
confiscatory health care system that
charges an average $19,865 for a family
insurance policy but still expects peo-


ple to spend an average of $3,020 per
year out of pocket.
Yes, there are problems with capital-
ism, ones that can’t be solved with
vague policy statements.
One concrete step is to align execu-
tive compensation with long-term suc-
cess rather than maximization of the
next quarter’s profits. CEOs of late have
been paid fortunes by boosting bottom
lines through the elimination of jobs —
either through automation or outsourc-
ing. This leaves the distasteful appear-
ance that they are profiting from other
people’s misery.
Also important is an acknowledg-
ment that some of America’s most prof-
itable industries are less exemplars of
free enterprise than of for-profit tax
collection. These industries, including
significant parts of health care, provide
services to individuals but then bill so-
ciety, placing enormous burdens on the
U.S. economy.
The Business Roundtable is not go-
ing to improve Americans’ dim view of
corporate America overnight. Never-
theless, it is on the right track to ac-
knowledge that corporations serve a
variety of constituencies — and have a
purpose that extends beyond juicing
stock prices.

TODAY'S DEBATE: CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY


Our view:Protect capitalism


from the capitalists


Protest in 2013 in New York City.
ANDREW BURTON/GETTY IMAGES

Last week, the Business Roundtable
launched a major attack on property
rights, the bedrock of capitalism. In a
stunning new mission statement, the
Roundtable, which represents nearly
200 of America’s blue-chip companies,
downgraded shareholders. According
to the Roundtable, the purpose of a cor-
poration will no longer be to conduct
business with the sole objective of gen-
erating profits for shareholders. Own-
ers of corporations (read: sharehold-
ers) will now just be one of five “stake-
holders”— alongside customers, work-
ers, suppliers and communities — that
will call the tune for corporations.
The Roundtable’s new anti-capital-
ist mission statement promises to di-
lute and muffle shareholders’ voices
and further politicize corporate govern-
ance. In 1848, John Stuart Mill clearly
saw where the Roundtable’s road map
would lead. In his classic “Principles of
Political Economy,” Mill wrote: “Lais-
sez-faire, in short, should be the gener-
al practice; every departure from it, un-
less required by some great good, is
certain evil.”


When it comes to economics, busi-
nessmen are notorious for talking non-
sense. The Roundtable’s statement is a
case in point. Any business that isn’t
focused on its customers, employees,
suppliers and communities does not
have its eye on the ball. And that “ball”
is profits for shareholders.
When it comes to the Business
Roundtable’s recent manifesto, it ap-
pears that the authors simply suffer
from a logical lapse and case of eco-
nomic illiteracy.
The great Austrian economist Jo-
seph Schumpeter concluded in his 1942
classic “Capitalism, Socialism and De-
mocracy” that businessmen would
“never put up a fight under the flag of
their own ideals and interest.” Indeed,
he foresaw that, rather than educating
capitalism’s enemies, businessmen
would allow themselves to be educated
by them. Schumpeter concluded that
businessmen, through their ignorance
and cowardice, would assist those who
wished to destroy capitalism.

Steve H. Hanke is a professor of ap-
plied economics at The Johns Hopkins
University.

Opposing view:Roundtable


suffers from economic illiteracy


Steve H. Hanke

Free download pdf