The Wall Street Journal - 03.09.2019

(Brent) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. ** Tuesday, September 3, 2019 |B5


in bank overdraft fees and $6
billion in payday loans.
The payroll-advance apps
come in different business de-
signs from companies such as
Earnin, PayActiv Inc. and Even
Responsible Finance Inc. Some
work directly with consumers
while others work with large
employers such asWalmart
Inc. andUber Technologies
Inc. The companies say the
services simply advance work-
ers part of the wages they
have already earned. That,
they say, sets them apart from
payday and other consumer
lenders and keeps them out-
side of existing payday-lending
laws and regulations.

“In the U.S., we have this
pay cycle that holds back peo-
ple’s pay,” said Ram Palaniap-
pan, chief executive of Earnin.
“What we have been able to
do is to give people access to
their pay as they earn it.”
Earnin tracks users’ work
and pay schedules using time
sheets or location services and
will deposit up to $500 per
pay period in their bank ac-
counts. Rather than charging
fees for its service, Earnin
asks users to consider volun-
tary tips of up to $14.
Earnin received a subpoena
from New York regulators in
March, industry experts said.
Several other payroll-advance

Manylower-incomehouseholdslackaccesstobanking,
oftenrequiringthemtoturntocostlyfinancialservices.

Note: Percentages don't add up to 100 due to rounding.
Source: Federal Reserve survey of 11,440 adults conducted Oct. 11-Nov. 12, 2018

Lessthan$

$-$

Morethan$

Highschooldegreeorless

Somecollegeorassociatedegree

Bachelor'sdegreeormore

14% 21% 64%

1 7 92

13% 21% 66%

4 18 77

1 9 89

Unbanked Underbanked Fullybanked

2 17 80

By income


By education


Bankingstatus:

Venture-capital firm An-
dreessen Horowitz, known for
early investments in innovative
companies such asFacebook
Inc., is putting up a fight
against Washington’s crypto-
currency crackdown.
The aim is to advance its
latest bet on futuristic technol-
ogy. In late May, at a full-day,
private conference in San Fran-
cisco, the firm was host to offi-
cials from the Treasury Depart-
ment and Washington’s
alphabet soup of regulatory
agencies.
The unusual event brought
together securities- and fu-
tures-markets watchdogs. Marc
Andreessen, in opening re-
marks, compared cryptocurren-
cies with the early internet,
which started as an informa-
tion network for computer sci-
entists and evolved into the
world’s information hub and an
engine for commerce. Crypto,
he said, could solve some of
the internet’s biggest chal-
lenges, including privacy
threats, if Washington would
adopt a less stringent form of
regulation.
The message back from
Washington wasn’t accommo-
dating, according to people
who attended. J. Christopher
Giancarlo, who was chairman
of the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission until step-
ping down in July, said he
warned Andreessen Horowitz
that regulation of crypto
couldn’t be brushed aside.
“Some of the things you
learned from your older VCs,
this won’t transfer,” he said.
The Treasury Department’s
undersecretary for terrorism
and financial intelligence told
startups at the conference,
many of them funded by An-
dreessen Horowitz, that com-
pliance with global anti-money-
laundering rules needed to
improve.
Securities and Exchange
Commission Chairman Jay
Clayton, who didn’t attend the
conference, clamped down on
cryptocurrencies and related
investments when he arrived in
Washington in 2017. The SEC
has told companies that they
can’t raise funds by selling dig-
ital assets without following
SEC rules, effectively killing off
the growth of initial coin offer-
ings in the U.S.
Investors such as Andrees-
sen Horowitz face the risk that
digital coins they bought or
sold could be deemed securi-
ties, which would restrict their
trading, potentially damping
value and adding layers of reg-
ulation. The firm also has bet
on a range of crypto startups
whose businesses could take
off if regulators lighten their
approach.
“It wasn’t something they
did purely out of altruism,”
said Kevin Werbach, a technol-
ogy scholar at the University of
Pennsylvania who attended the
conference. “Everyone under-
stands they are investors in the
space and have viewpoints
about what the regulatory envi-
ronment should look like.”
Regulated companies often
meet with regulators in private.
While regulators often attend
industry conferences that are
usually open to the public, An-
dreessen Horowitz’s event was
unusual, according to regula-
tory experts, because the firm
got so many government offi-
cials with influence over crypto
to show up and hear about the
industry on its terms.
“For one VC that has such a
clear monetary interest in get-
ting favorable regulatory treat-
ment for crypto assets to host
the event in a private, invite-
only setting, it does strike me
as unusual and untoward from
a public standpoint,” said Lee
Reiners, executive director of
the Global Financial Markets
Center at Duke University.
Andreessen Horowitz says it
is trying to bridge a gap be-
tween financial regulators and
the crypto industry, which
sprang up with a goal of dis-
placing traditional Wall Street
middlemen and making most
regulation obsolete.
“Regulation itself is not the
problem, it’s the lack of clarity
around crypto regulation that
our companies and the crypto
space overall grapple with,”
said Kim Milosevich, a spokes-
woman for Andreessen Horo-
witz.


BYDAVEMICHAELS
ANDALEXANDEROSIPOVICH


VC Firm


Battles


Crypto


Crackdown


BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

   




  
 


 
!!!"#"
  $% &&

CAREERS

 
 

   



 



      

 

 !   "
  
 
 

  
  
 
 

 

The Marketplace


ADVERTISEMENT

To advertise: 800-366-3975 or WSJ.com/classifieds

NOTICE OF SALE

    

  
 
 
    
   !"  #$ $$% & '
( &)*
+, -   + .&/

'(&)* %%   %    0 %& 
0%  & %&   / 0&& '
(%)* %% /
% &   +, - 
12 344  '(5 )* 
 & &  %$&
%0%6 $6 $$0   2 +,

 7%  %$& %0%6 $6 '(3//
5 )*
/    %%6 /
& %%%
%%  &%&    $&&
& 8& %&/ & 6 /$ && 
 1 ,
+9
  $ $6 : 0 $&&
&  $&;& ' %$& %0%6 $6
$$0 
/ & %%% & 
%&/&6/$&0/&
  % 0/  &  %%:%6 
 ( %%%)*< 3// 5 = % 
  % 6 %&  +, -  
 !"
 !"<  %
/%%6 &%&
 / ,
+
%%  " %   ;
 80/ > 
< <
?@@ & :

!"
 !" ?  $0 
+  A@
<$< ' (% 7)*
06 3 

06
3 3
& 
! 7  B
C@CCC
 D%%$ < 3
! 7  B ?@++<
&  %&%"&&%$
/&/  %%%
 E$  0  0&&
  %%%
  $   % %&
  /  &
. % 3"
+,
" :
 !"
 !" ?
A
" 0
3// 7
%A '++*
@?++@
$%A "<0F/"<$
 &=
%
80/ > 
< <
?@@ & :
 !"
 !" ?
A  <

E<
%A '++* ,,9C@9
$%A F
0/<$<
Photo: The Clement Canopy property dcomplex by the Bouygues group in Singapore.evelopment, a benchmark modular© T. Ching Yee/Orange Cactus Project –construction
Architect: ADDP Architects.

Consult the full press release and results presentation onbouygues.com
Investor Relations: [email protected]
@GroupeBouygues

BOUYGUES FIRST-HALF
2019 RESULTS

SIGNIFICANT
IMPROVEMENT
IN GROUP
PROFITABILITY

OUTLOOK
CONFIRMED

(1) Machine to machine communication: this refers to direct communication between machines
or smart devices or between smart devices and people.
(2) Fiber to the Home: optical fiber rolled out all the way to homes or business premises.
(3) Free cash flow = Net cash flow (determined after (i) cost of net debt, (ii) interest expense on
lease obligations and (iii) income taxes paid), minus net capital expenditure and repayments
of lease obligations. It is calculated before changes in working capital requirements (WCR).
(4) Free cash flow after WCR = Net cash flow (determined after (i) cost of net debt, (ii) interest
expense on lease obligations and (iii) income taxes paid), minus net capital expenditure and
repayments of lease obligations. It is calculated after changes in working capital requirements (WCR)
related to operating activities and excluding 5G frequencies.

(a) The consolidated financial statements at
June 30, 2019 are presented in comparison
with the financial statements at June 30, 2018,
restated to take account of the application
from January 1, 2019 of IFRS 16 on leases.
(b) Up 5% like-for-like and at constant exchange
rates.
(c) Including non-current income of €50m at
Bouygues Telecom and non-current charges of
€8m at Bouygues Construction.
(d) The year-on-year increase mainly reflects
the acquisitions of Alpiq ES by Bouygues
Construction and Colas, and of Keyyo and
Nerim by Bouygues Telecom.


  • GOOD COMMERCIAL PERFORMANCE
    IN THE THREE SECTORS OF ACTIVITY

  • STRONG GROWTH IN RESULTS AT
    BOUYGUES TELECOM

  • INCREASE IN SECOND-QUARTER CURRENT
    OPERATING PROFIT IN THE CONSTRUCTION
    BUSINESSES YEAR-ON-YEAR


The first half of 2019 was marked by good commercial
performance in all sectors of activity:


  • Bouygues Telecom gained 280,000 new mobile plan
    customers excluding MtoM^1 , of which 132,000 were in
    second-quarter 2019, and 176,000 new FTTH^2 customers,
    of which 82,000 were in second-quarter 2019;

  • the backlog in the construction businesses reached the
    high level of €33.8 billion, stable year-on-year;

  • TF1’s audience share of the target market of women under
    50 who are purchasing decision-makers rose 0.2 points
    year-on-year to 32.7%.
    There was a significant improvement in Group profitability
    year-on-year:

  • Bouygues Telecom reported strong growth in results;
    a 14% increase in total sales, 7% growth in sales from
    services, and an EBITDA margin after Leases of 29.3%, a
    significant increase of 2.7 points;

  • current operating profit in the construction businesses
    was up 4% in second-quarter 2019;

  • the current operating margin at TF1 was up 4.8 points to
    14.2%.
    The Group’s current operating margin rose 0.5 points year-
    on-year to 2.6%. Net profit attributable to the Group was
    €225 million, down €36 million year-on-year, notably due to
    a lower contribution from Alstom (€33 million in first-half 2019,
    versus €73 million in first-half 2018).


THE GROUP CONFIRMED ITS OUTLOOK


  • In 2019,to improve Group profitability and generate
    €300 million of free cash flow^3 at Bouygues Telecom.

  • Within two years,to increase Group free cash flow
    generation after WCR^4 to €1 billion thanks to the
    contribution of the three sectors of activity.


CONSOLIDATED
KEY FIGURESa

SALES
€m

17,446+11%b


CURRENT
OPERATING PROFIT
€m

453 +€120m


OPERATING PROFIT
€m

495


c
+€82m

NET PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE
TO THE GROUP
€m

225 €36m


NET DEBT
€m

(6,205)€1,175md


repayments deducted from
workers’ paychecks over four
months to a couple of years.
LenderKashableapproves
more than 60% of applicants,
said co-CEO Einat Steklov. It
considers factors including job
tenure and credit scores. The
average user has a subprime
credit score and pays an an-
nual interest rate of about 20%,
Ms. Steklov said. Kashable’s
default rate is 5%. Borrowers
who leave their jobs before re-
paying in full generally switch
to automated bank transfers.
Pima County, Ariz., has of-
fered its 7,000 employees
Kashable loans since 2016.
Nearly 500 workers, many
with credit scores below 650,
have borrowed an average of
$2,000 each, said county su-
pervisor Richard Elías.
He said nearly half reported
using the loan to pay off
higher-cost debt, and many
purchased or repaired cars.
“Anything we can do to make
the economic lives of our
workers more stable benefits
us” in the form of higher pro-
ductivity, Mr. Elías said.

low-cost tools, though they
disagree on how businesses
should be structured and regu-
lated.
“It hasn’t solved the income
inequality problem,” said Todd
Baker, a senior fellow at Co-
lumbia Business School. “What
it does is replace, for a nomi-
nal cost, the $30, $40 people
pay today for a single over-
draft or a $200 payday loan.”
Financial Health Network, a
research organization partly
funded by financial firms, esti-
mated financially stressed
consumers spent $173 billion
in fees and interest in 2016 for
services that often incur high
costs, including $24.5 billion

advances in late 2017. It has
seen employees rely less on
payday loans and bank over-
drafts, said David Hoke, who
oversees health and well-be-
ing. Employees pay $6 a
month to use PayActiv. It is
embedded in an app called
Even, which includes a budget-
ing service that nudges users
to save surpluses.
Walmart covers the cost for
one month a quarter and caps
the amount workers can accel-
erate at 50% of pay. Of the
company’s 1.4 million workers,
380,000 are frequent app us-
ers, Mr. Hoke said.
For those in need of larger
sums, some employers offer
loan services that typically ad-
vance as much as $5,000, with

Continued from page B1

Payroll


Advances


Get Easier


BUSINESS NEWS


companies, including PayActiv
and Even, also have received
letters from the regulators,
the experts said.
“It’s a new model. We wel-
come their questions,” Mr.
Palaniappan said.
California’s proposed legis-
lation is sponsored by PayAc-
tiv and has support from other
industry participants who see
the bill as a way to sanction
their business model as non-
lenders and set standards to
prevent abusive practices.
“We welcome the regula-
tors’ attention on this issue
because I believe it will pre-
vent the industry from re-
gressing toward the same
mean as payday lenders,” said
Jon Schlossberg, chief execu-
tive of Even, which offers a fi-
nancial-planning tool that in-
cludes instant access to
earned pay through employ-
ers. PayActiv Chief Executive
Safwan Shah said he looks for-
ward to state investigations
bringing clarity to the market.
Some consumer advocates
criticize California’s bill for al-
lowing providers to access the
consumers’ bank accounts di-
rectly, which could trigger
nonsufficient-funds and over-
draft fees charged by banks.
“Our biggest concern is that it
authorizes a new category of
payday loans that don’t have
to comply with interest-rate
limits,” said Lauren Saunders,
associate director at the Na-
tional Consumer Law Center.
The pay-access apps, partic-
ularly those dealing directly
with consumers, have similari-
ties to payday loans, including
a basic feature where the con-
sumers receive payment in ex-
change for information about
their bank account, from
which payments are later au-
tomatically collected. Unlike
payday lenders, however, pay-
access providers have no re-
course, meaning if their cus-
tomers fail to pay back the
money, the companies can’t go
after them and file collection
lawsuits. The payments also
can’t be rolled over for more
fees either, a feature that
makes payday loans costly for
many consumers.

WASHINGTON—A growing
industry of financial apps that
allow workers to access their
pay early is drawing scrutiny
from regulators to prove they
are different from payday
lenders.
Several startups have
launched services to provide
workers with small payments,
ranging in size from pocket
change to several hundred dol-
lars, to be paid back on the
next payday. Tapping into
thirst for fast cash from mil-
lions of Americans who live
paycheck to paycheck, the
companies behind the services
have presented them as
cheaper and safer alternatives
to short-term loans, such as
payday loans, and bank over-
drafts.
Last month, regulators from
New York and 10 other states
said they were investigating
whether some payroll-advance
firms violated payday-lending
laws. In California, state law-
makers are debating a law
that aims to set the legal foun-
dation for the industry and
provide consumer protections,
the first such attempt in the
country.
The moves by state officials
come as the industry is grow-
ing. Leslie Parrish, an analyst
for research firm Aite Group,
said the industry is “poised
for exponential growth.” Aite
Group estimated the app com-
panies handled 18.6 million
early U.S. payroll transactions
valued at more than $3.15 bil-
lion in 2018.
“This investigation will help
determine whether these pay-
roll-advance practices are usu-
rious and harming consum-
ers,” said Linda Lacewell, New
York’s chief financial regulator.
She added that some of the
firms “appear to collect usuri-
ous or otherwise unlawful in-
terest rates disguised as tips,
monthly memberships” and
other fees.
Industry executives and
some consumer advocates say
the services offer the potential
to help lower- and moderate-
income workers by providing

BYYUKAHAYASHI

Pay-App Startups Draw Scrutiny


The Earnin service tracks workers’ schedules and will deposit up to $500 per pay period for them.

EARNIN

NY/NE
Free download pdf