A
n article by two Royal Tank Corps
offi cers that appeared in the Royal Tank
Corps Journal around 1931 discussed
the problems facing the commander of a
two-man light tank which, they felt, could be
overcome if the tank’s crew could be increased
by at least half a man.
Since half a man was not feasible, the War
Offi ce decided that in future they would
concentrate on the development of a three-man
light tank.
So that, in addition to the driver there would
be a new man to operate the weapons and the
wireless, leaving the commander free to keep
a look-out from his hatch, navigate, direct the
driver and generally command.
This was not an entirely original idea. In
1929 Vickers-Armstrongs had produced an
ugly looking tank designated A5E1which had
a crew of three but ultimately disappeared
without trace while, three years earlier the Royal
Ordnance Factory had been responsible for the
design and construction of A3E1, sometimes
referred to as the three-man light tank. This
was a peculiar contraption featuring a machine
gun turret at each end which must have been
more diffi cult to command and fi ght than
Since half a man was not feasible, the War
Offi ce decided that in future they would
This was not an entirely original idea. In
1929 Vickers-Armstrongs had produced an
gun turret at each end which must have been
more diffi cult to command and fi ght than
‘Naturally the new turret was larger,
in order to accommodate two men and as a result the
tank’s hull was wider to carry it’
The
of Tanks
A Light Mark V on the road at
Bovington. The two-man turret crew
is visible and the commander has his
map reading frame erected
The section lined up, in those peaceful days the
regiment liked to have itself identifi ed on the turret