The Wall Street Journal - 22.08.2019

(ff) #1

B2| Thursday, August 22, 2019 ** THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.**


INDEX TO BUSINESSES


These indexes cite notable references to most parent companies and businesspeople
in today’s edition. Articles on regional page inserts aren’t cited in these indexes.


A

Aflac............................B6
Alibaba Group Holding
............................... B1,B3
Alliance Resource
Partners....................B6
Alphabet......................B4
Amazon.com...............B3
Amgen.........................B1
Angel Oak Mortgage
Solutions..................A3
Apple...........................B1
AT&T............................B1


B

Bank of America.........B4
Bayer.........................B12
Bayerische Motoren
Werke........................B3
BMW...........................B3
BNP Paribas................A7
Brunswick..................B12


C

Charter Communications
.....................................B1
Cisco Systems.......B1,B6
Citigroup.....................A7
Comcast.......................B1
Consol Energy.............B6
Corteva Agriscience..B12
Cowen..........................B2


D-E

DuPont de Nemours.B12
eBay.............................B3


eCommunity................B3
Elanco Animal Health
...................................B12
Expedia Group.............B6
F
Fiat Chrysler
Automobiles.............B3
Ford Motor..................B3
Foresight Energy........B6
G
General Motors...........B3
Glass Lewis.................B1
H
Home Depot..............B12
Honda Motor...............B3
Huawei Technologies.A7
I
Institutional
Shareholder Services
.....................................B1
J
Japan Post Holdings..B6
J.C. Penney..................B1
Jumia Technologies....B3
K
Kia Motors..................B3
Kohl's...........................B2
L
L Brands......................B2
Lowe's..........B1,B11,B12

M
Macy's..................B1,B12
Microsoft.....................B4
MTN Group..................B3
Murray Energy............B6
N
Netflix.........................B4
Nordstrom...................B1
P
Peabody Energy..........B6
Pernod Ricard..............B3
Pfizer.........................B12
R
RDM Financial Group.B2
Rosatom......................A9
Royal Bank of Canada
...................................B10
S
Skycom Tech...............A7
T
Takeda Pharmaceutical
...................................B12
Target...........B1,B11,B12
Textio...........................B6
ThredUP.......................B2
TJX...............................B1
V
Volkswagen.................B3
W
Walmart...............B1,B12
Wolverine Fuels..........B6

INDEX TO PEOPLE


BUSINESS & FINANCE


called declines notable.
Technology companies,
which accounted for more
than a third of the buybacks in
the second quarter, spent
roughly $52 billion, down 23%
from the first three months of
the year and 18% from last
year. Apple, the biggest
spender among companies in
the S&P 500, slowed purchases
to $18.15 billion from $23.81
billion in the first quarter.
Networking-equipment
maker Cisco has also pulled
back. “We’re going to get back
down to our normal strategy,
which is being very opportu-
nistic when our stock’s
down...and buying, but really
balancing between both the
dividend and the buyback to
be at least 50% of our free
cash flow,” Kelly Kramer,
Cisco’s chief financial officer,
said on the company’s earn-
ings call last week.
Cisco shares are up 13% in
2019 but have slumped 12% in
August after the company cut
its growth forecast, partly be-
cause of weakness in China.
Apple, meanwhile, has
surged 35% this year and is es-
sentially flat for the month.
Buybacks have faced oppo-
sition on Capitol Hill. Demo-
cratic presidential candidates
have signaled that they want
to restrict how much stock
U.S. companies can buy back,
arguing that buybacks enrich
shareholders at the expense of
workers. And Republican Sen.
Marco Rubio of Florida un-
veiled a proposal this year to
change how investors are
taxed when companies buy
back shares.

on buybacks in the second
quarter, but all three slowed
spending from the first quar-
ter and year over year.
“Given the greater uncer-
tainty in terms of trade,
weaker growth overseas and
the potential for an economic
slowdown in the U.S., I
wouldn’t be surprised to see
companies hold on to more
cash over the next several
months,” said Michael Shel-
don, chief investment officer
of RDM Financial Group at
HighTower.
Despite spurts of volatility,
the S&P 500 is still up 17% for
the year—and within 4% of
last month’s record high.
Companies and investors
often cheer share repurchases
because they boost per-share
earnings and often stock
prices. But others argue those
funds are better spent on
long-term investment projects,
such as building factories or
on research and development.
Corporate capital expendi-
tures have slowed this year,
adding to worries that eco-
nomic growth is fading. Many
executives have said the lin-
gering trade tensions with
China are giving them pause.
ThelatestdatafromS&PDow
Jones Indices indicate capital


Continued from the prior page


Companies


Scale Back


Buybacks


expenditures picked up in the
second quarter, improving
5.2% from the first three
months of the year but still
7.8% below the boom seen at
the end of last year.
The willingness among
companies to buy back their
shares has been among the
biggest driving forces of the
decadelong bull market. Since
2013, U.S. companies have
poured $4.2 trillion into stock
buybacks, according to Bank of
America Merrill Lynch. Inves-
tors, though, haven’t shown
the same enthusiasm for
stocks. Mutual funds and ex-
change-traded funds tracking
U.S. equities have posted $84
billion in outflows over the
same period, according to the
bank’s analysis of EPFR Global
data.
Corporate buybacks
boomed after the U.S. tax
overhaul in December 2017,

with every quarter in 2018
marking a new high for share
repurchases. The recent easing
in activity has some analysts
and investors questioning
whether the shift marks a re-
turn to the norm, or if compa-
nies are pulling back the reins
for other reasons.
“The sugar high might have
subsided for buybacks,” said
Howard Silverblatt, senior in-
dex analyst at S&P Dow Jones
Indices. “The third quarter
will be telling regarding how
companies reacted to more
market volatility and uncer-
tainty.”
The pullback in spending
was broad across industries:
Six of the 10 companies that
spent the most on buybacks in
the second quarter reduced
spending from the first three
months of the year. Some ana-
lysts said that seasonality
could be a factor but still

Apple slowed quarterly purchases of its shares to $18.15 billion.

QILAI SHEN/BLOOMBERG NEWS

B

Bader, Rupert..............B6


C

Chen, Oliver................B2


D

Dattner, Gil.................B3


F

Foss, Aaron.................B4


G

Gallo, Alberto............B11
Garr, Ethan..................B4
Gennette, Jeff............B2
Grant, R.J..................B11
Grom, Chuck................B1


H

Hansson, David
Heinemeier...............B6
Herrman, Ernie...........B1


I
Iannelli, Andrea........B11
K
Kahn, Jeff...................B6
Kopf, Christian..........B11
Kramer, Kelly..............B2
Kurland, Ben...............B1
L
Longinaker, Will.........A3
M
Ma, Jack......................B6
Martin, Thomas........B11
McAlister, Gerald........B4
McKay, Dave.............B10
Medeiros, Gustavo...B11
P
Phillips, Jason.............B6
Poignonnec, Sacha......B3

R
Retelny, Gary..............B1
Ronan, Piers..............B11
S
Sasson, Leon...............B6
Saunders, Neil............B2
Sheldon, Michael........B2
Silverblatt, Howard....B2
Sita, Leslie................B11
Smith, Brett................B3
Snyder, Kieran.............B6
T
Tomé, Carol...............B12
W
Weber, Andy...............A3
Wexner, Leslie............B2
Z
Zigdon, Nir..................B3

L Brands Inc.’s revenue fell
in its latest quarter as sales
at the retailer’s embattled
flagship Victoria’s Secret
chain declined further.
The Columbus, Ohio, re-
tailer reported net sales of
$2.9 billion for its second
quarter, compared with $2.98
billion a year earlier. Analysts
polled by FactSet predicted
$2.95 billion in revenue.
Comparable sales, which
include digital and same-
store sales, decreased 1%
from a year earlier.
Victoria’s Secret sales fell
7% to $1.61 billion from a year
earlier, below the $1.67 bil-
lion analysts were expecting.
Victoria’s Secret has
posted four consecutive quar-
ters of year-over-year de-
clines in sales, as the com-

pany contends with increased
competition and changing
customer wants.
Overall, L Brands, which
also owns Bath & Body
Works, posted a profit of
$37.6 million, or 14 cents a
share, compared with $99
million, or 36 cents a share, a
year earlier.
The company reported ad-
justed earnings of 24 cents a
share. Analysts polled by
FactSet were expecting earn-
ingsof20centsashare.
Sales of the company’s
Bath & Body Works’ unit
grew by 10% to $1.06 billion
from a year earlier.
Shares of L Brands fell
0.4% during after-hours trad-
ing. The company reaffirmed
its adjusted earnings outlook
for the year of between $2.30
and $2.60 a share.
The founder and chief ex-

ecutive of L Brands, Leslie
Wexner, has come under in-
creased scrutiny in recent
months for his ties to Jeffrey
Epstein, the disgraced finan-
cier who was indicted on fed-
eral sex-trafficking charges
stemming from an alleged
scheme to exploit underage
girls.
Mr. Epstein was Mr. Wex-
ner’s personal money man-
ager for about two decades.
Mr. Epstein had pleaded
not guilty in the case. He was
found dead in a Manhattan
jail cell Aug. 10, while await-
ing trial. A medical examiner
determined the cause of
death was suicide.
Mr. Wexner said this
month that his former money
manager misappropriated
more than $46 million of his
fortune, revealing for the
first time some of the finan-

cial fallout from their rela-
tionship.
L Brands’ board has also
hired an outside law firm to
conduct a review of Mr. Ep-
stein’s role at the company.
Meanwhile, L Brands said
this month that its longtime
chief marketing officer, Ed-
ward Razek, will step down
from his role, as the parent
company of Victoria’s Secret
faces backlash from consum-
ers about the unit’s market-
ing strategy.
In recent years, Victoria’s
Secret’s emphasis on images
of supermodels and padded
bras has alienated customers
and invited criticism that the
brand is out of touch.
Demand for the company’s
bras has cooled as customers
have turned to brands empha-
sizing comfort and inclusiv-
ity.

BYPATRICKTHOMAS

Victoria’s Secret Extends Slump


consecutive quarters—drove
the sales increase.
TJX stores rapidly turn over
limited quantities of goods at
bargain prices. The result is a
constant treasure hunt as
shoppers come back to ferret
out deals. There is no glut of
stock in the backroom. Cus-
tomers know if they don’t buy
it today, the item might not be
there tomorrow.
Nordstrom, on the other
hand, is suffering along with
other department stores as
shoppers make fewer visits to


Continued from the prior page


malls and buy more online.
Also, unlike Walmart and Tar-
get, department stores don’t
have large grocery offerings to
prompt frequent visits.
Nordstrom said on Wednes-
day that second-quarter net
sales fell 5.1% to $3.78 billion.
Profit fell to $141 million, from
$162 million in the year-earlier
period, and the company low-
ered earnings guidance for the
full fiscal year.
Nordstrom’s second-quarter
profit beat analysts’ estimates.
In after-hours trading, the
stock gained 12%.
Kohl’s Corp. is struggling
even though it has tried to
boost traffic by adding ser-
vices. Under a partnership
with Amazon.com Inc., shop-
pers can return items bought
on the e-commerce site to any
of Kohl’s more than 1,100 loca-
tions. Nevertheless, the re-
tailer’s sales fell for the third

consecutive quarter in the
most recent period, leaving it
with excess merchandise that
it had to mark down, hurting
profit.
Illustrating the retail divide,
Kohl’s shares have fallen 41%
over the past 12 months, while
Walmart’s stock is up 17%.
More than a decade after
the last recession, consumers
still remain “extremely focused
on getting value for the dol-
lar,” said Neil Saunders, a
managing director of Global-
Data PLC, a research firm. “A
lot of retailers haven’t added
that value, and consumers are
just going elsewhere.”
Even some higher-end
brands are performing poorly,
including Michael Kors and
Kate Spade, both of which re-
ported a drop in same-store
sales in their most recent
quarter.
They can’t blame weak con-

sumer spending and fears of a
possible recession. In July, re-
tail sales increased at their
strongest pace since March,
giving the economy a boost.
“The consumer is still
healthy,” Macy’s CEO Jeff Gen-

nette said in an interview last
week.
Other factors are upending
traditional retailers, from
higher rent and labor costs to
the rise in online shopping.
Department stores in particu-
lar are heavily dependent on
apparel that can be found al-

most everywhere, making it
easy for shoppers to compare
prices online.
Retailers also have to con-
tend with the Trump adminis-
tration’s tariffs on goods im-
ported from China, which are
pressuring profits.
Consumers’ love affair with
a good deal is evident in the
rise of thrift shopping, which
is on track to overtake sales of
fast fashion at the likes of
Zara and H&M within a de-
cade.
“If off-price chains like T.J.
Maxx wooed shoppers with
promises of 20% to 60% off
regular retail prices, resale
websites like thredUP offer
discounts of as much as 90%
off,” said Oliver Chen, an ana-
lyst at Cowen & Co. “That is
making it harder for tradi-
tional retailers.”
Macy’s and Penney are
jumping into the secondhand

market. Both unveiled partner-
ships last week with thredUP
Inc. to sell used clothing and
accessories in some of their
stores. Macy’s has also gotten
into the off-price game by
opening Macy’s Backstage dis-
count stores, which compete
with T.J. Maxx.
Macy’s last week lowered
its full-year earnings outlook
after it missed profit expecta-
tions, sending shares tum-
bling, while Penney said sales
at stores open at least a year
fell 9%.
Analysts say these stores
aren’t doing enough to adapt
to the changes in consumer
behavior.
“They are jumping on
someone else’s bandwagon,
rather than innovating,” Mr.
Saunders, of GlobalData, said.
“They are playing catch-up,
and that’s not good enough in
retailing today.”

L Brands’ flagship chain has seen sales drop for four straight quarters as it contends with increased competition and changing tastes.

JOHN TAGGART/BLOOMBERG NEWS

Nimble


Retailers


See Reward


Consumers remain
‘extremely focused
on getting value
for the dollar.’

Buy One ZVOX


Hearing Aid.


Get One Free!


Can’t hear conversations in noisy rooms? VoiceBuds®are
FDA registered hearing aids that use digital technology
designed to make voices clear. Most hearing devices use
one microphone. But VoiceBud hearing aids use a two-
microphone system to minimize background sounds while
clarifying the voices you want to hear. For a limited time
you can buy one hearing aid and get the second one free!
Quality hearing aids made affordable!

60-Day Home Trial | Free Shipping | Lifetime Tech Support
® ZVOX, AccuVoice & VoiceBud are registered trademarks of ZVOX Audio.

Helping People Hear Since 2003
Order at ZVOX.com or 800-956-5743

Get apairof ZVOX dual-microphone
hearing aids with app control for only$299.99!

 Directional microphones reduce background sound.
 Smartphone app for wireless control.
 American made electronic components.
 So small they are virtually invisible when worn.
 60 Day Money-Back Guarantee...Free Return Shipping.

$
299
99
FREE

OFFER ENDS LABOR DAY

REGISTERED
FDA
Free download pdf