A12| Friday, August 23, 2019 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
Jay-Z Caught
In Kaepernick
Buzzsaw
The star rapper was surprised by the sharp
criticism of his social-justice pact with the NFL
Above, NFL commissioner Roger
Goodell and Jay-Z appear at a news
conference. Left, Dolphins receiver
Kenny Stills was critical of the deal.
equipment—the price keeps going
up, driving away kids from families
that can’t afford the bill. The result
is something of a paradox: A “com-
petitive” environment which be-
comes deeply exclusive, since only
a fraction of the population has the
means to compete.
“Parents who can afford to do so
[are investing] more heavily in
their child at an earlier age,” says
Tom Farrey, the founder and exec-
utive director of the Aspen Insti-
tute’s Sports & Society program.
“When you do that, you begin to
push aside the families who can’t
afford the youth sports arms race.
You [also] end up heaping enor-
mous amounts of pressure on the
bodies and the minds of the chil-
dren who are still in the game.”
Farrey compares it to “an exer-
cise in anti-trust, in which access
to competition is shaped by un-
earned advantage.”
There have always been hyper-
competitive youth leagues, of
course, and adults who don’t know
how to relax. But Farrey, who
wrote a 2009 book called “Game
On: How the Pressure to Win at All
Costs Endangers Youth Sports, and
What Parents Can Do About It,”
believes the growth of athletic
scholarship opportunities—and the
rising costs of college—ratcheted
up the stakes.
“[Parents] know how expensive
college is, and they start to think
to themselves, ‘Huh, if I get him on
the right travel team, hire the pri-
vate trainers, buy him the $
graphite bat, maybe my kid can get
a college athletic scholarship,’ ” he
says. “Or, increasingly, with
wealthier families, preferential ad-
mission.”
(When the college-admissions
scandal broke—with stories of stu-
dent heads photoshopped atop
other bodies of student-athletes—
Farrey wasn’t the least bit sur-
prised. “There’s a reason this be-
havior happens.”)
The solution, Farrey thinks, is
turning down the volume. Play the
games, but cool the win-at-all-costs
More kids are bailing early on organized sports—undone by the pressures, financial hurdles, or injuries.
ROBYN BECK/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
competitiveness. Prioritize inclu-
sion and free play—those moments
when young athletes can take con-
trol of practice. Don’t make kids
specialize on one sport, a recipe
for burnout and repetitive stress
injuries. Let them play everything.
“The game-changers in all of
this are parents,” says Farrey.
“They think they understand what
athletic development looks like,
but they don’t really know. They
don’t know about the value of free
play in developing creativity. They
don’t fully appreciate the value of
playing multiple sports...as a way
of developing skills that are going
to make you better in a different
sport.”
Asked for positive signs, Farrey
points to renewed interest in “in-
town” recreational sports. For
years, travel teams have been gut-
ting smaller rec-league programs,
which tend to be more welcoming
and less stressful.
Major League Baseball teams
have taken notice, investing in re-
lationships with town leagues, not
as a place to scout talent—but
build future fans. Twenty-five MLB
teams now sponsor low-cost, in-
town leagues, Farrey says.
“It’s not an act of altruism, it’s
an act of enlightened self-interest,”
hesays.“Theyseeitasabrand
builder. You can get a lot of kids
wearing your logo and developing
an affinity for your team.”
Who benefits ultimately? Every-
one. That’s the urgency here.
There’s abundant evidence that a
healthy youth sports environment
has a societal reach far beyond the
playing field.
“People want their kids playing
sports,” Farrey says. “Kids who
play sports are less likely to be
obese, more likely to stay in
school, more likely to go to college,
less likely to suffer chronic dis-
eases, and more likely to be active
as parents.”
It all seems so sensible, but it’s
clear we’re losing our way. Maybe
it’s time to implement the “mercy
rule.” Hit the ice cream truck—and
give youth sports in America a do-
over.
B
efore Jay-Z’s new role
promoting the NFL’s so-
cial-justice initiatives
became public last
week, the rap icon
placed a courtesy call to Colin
Kaepernick. The former San Fran-
cisco 49ers quarterback’s racial-in-
equality protests, after all, ignited
a firestorm three seasons ago—
and, in the eyes of most, cost
Kaepernick his career.
A day later, however, Jay-Z was
shocked that his involvement with
the league was being interpreted
by some as an affront to Kaeper-
nick, according to two people fa-
miliar with the matter. Jay-Z,
these people said, thought his
move to use the country’s most
popular sports league as a plat-
form for an important cause would
be well-received.
Instead, he was under attack.
Eric Reid—the Carolina Panthers
safety who has been Kaepernick’s
closest ally—called Jay-Z a “sell-
out,” alleging that the rapper had
provided cover for the league to
hide behind. Miami Dolphins wide
receiver Kenny Stills said: “I feel
like Jay-Z really discredited Colin
and myself and the work that’s be-
ing done in our communities.”
Jay-Z’s bid to lend his credibil-
ity to the NFL had unknowingly
waded into an internal firefight
that has been raging among play-
ers for several years over how the
league should address topics such
as racial inequality and police bru-
tality.
On one side is the Players Coali-
tion, a group of players that has
worked on various initiatives and
helped pass criminal justice bills in
states like Louisiana and Michigan,
which has been willing to work in
association with the NFL to boost
their social justice efforts.
On the other is a more strident
group that has chafed at doing
business with the league while
Kaepernick remains unsigned. This
group views the league’s effort—
including the deal with Jay-Z—as a
public-relations stunt meant to pa-
per over a problematic approach.
The critical reaction to Jay-Z’s
role was intensified by the fact
that his NFL deal wasn’t just about
social justice. Another part of the
arrangement involves giving the
rapper’s company, Roc Nation, cre-
ative control of some NFL enter-
tainment properties, including the
Super Bowl halftime show.
And Jay-Z’s own comments
about Kaepernick prompted some
to accuse him of adopting the
league’s rhetoric about the player
demonstrations during the na-
tional anthem. When the arrange-
ment was announced last week he
said that “we can get stuck on Co-
lin not having a job.” He added
that the league has “moved past
kneeling” and that it’s “time to go
into actionable items.”
“I’m into real work,” he said.
Both sides of the divide want to
use their status as NFL stars to
promote social justice change. But
they have feuded, at times pub-
licly, over the best way to achieve
that.
Beginning in 2016, when Kaep-
ernick began protesting social in-
justices and racial inequalities by
kneeling during the national an-
them, the league has been rattled
by these issues. By 2017, the con-
troversy was inflamed further
when President Trump persistently
assailed the protests as unpatriotic
and the NFL for allowing them to
continue.
The league, which was dealing
with its own internal disputes
among ownership amid sagging
ratings, was eager to quell the
strife. So it began a conversation
between owners and players aimed
at addressing the issues underpin-
ning the protest movement.
Those negotiations produced a
partnership with the NFL to back
the players’ causes. It also created
this fissure among the players who
shared a common cause but dis-
agreed on the process.
In those discussions, the players
were represented by the Players
Coalition, a group founded by Phil-
adelphia Eagles safety Malcolm
Jenkins and now-retired wide re-
ceiver Anquan Boldin to make an
impact on social justice and racial
equality. They secured the backing
of the league, with the potential
for tens of millions of dollars of
funding to advance those causes
and an agreement that players
would match owners’ contribu-
tions, up to a certain amount, on
the local level. Jenkins, who had
been raising his fist during the na-
tional anthem, ceased doing so in
the wake of the agreement.
But not all players were enam-
ored with the deal. Some, such as
Reid, backed out of the Players Co-
alition and said publicly that they
didn’t feel as if the Players Coali-
tion was effectively representing
their views. They felt that their
message was being co-opted by
the league, a person familiar with
the matter said at the time, and
that the player-driven effort was
being transformed into a shield to
give cover for the NFL on these
sensitive issues. Later, Reid called
Jenkins a “neo-colonialist.”
In an interview, members of the
Players Coalition stressed their in-
dependence from the NFL and that
they had nothing to do with the
league’s partnership with Jay-Z.
They said while it may bring un-
wanted attention, it can also be a
signal from the league of their ef-
forts to amplify their causes that
have already achieved legislative
changes across the country.
Referring to the Players Coali-
tion’s pact with the league, now-
retired Seattle Seahawks wide re-
ceiver Doug Baldwin said it was
important for the NFL to have
“skin in the game because of the
PR nightmare they were going
through,” but he emphasized that
the organization is fully player led,
with causes chosen by the players.
“There were some fundamental
disagreements on the direction of
the organization,” he said of the
rift with other players.
“The fact that our name comes
up also reinforces the fact that
people know and understand that
the men in our locker rooms and
the men in the coalition care about
our communities,” said Patriots
tight end Ben Watson, a member
of the Players Coalition.
Still, tensions between the two
factions persisted into last season,
and they resurfaced again this
week when Reid called Roc Na-
tion’s partnership with the NFL
“Players Coalition 2.0.”
“He got paid to take the bullets
that he’s taking now, because
we’re not having it,” Reid said.
But this week, those same play-
ers upset with the league over how
it has handled these issues found
an unlikely ally: the Players Coali-
tion. The group pressured Stephen
Ross, the Dolphins owner, to step
down from his role on the league’s
social justice committee after Ross
hosted a fundraiser for Trump.
BYANDREWBEATON
Youth Sports Have Gotten Too Crazy
JASON GAY
FROM TOP: KEVIN MAZUR/GETTY IMAGES FOR ROC NATION; STEVE MITCHELL/REUTERS
SPORTS
The Little League
World Series is well
under way, and the
scene looks so excit-
ing—talented ball-
players; big crowds; a
warm hug of attention from Major
Leaguers and national TV.
When I was growing up, I
dreamed of playing in the Little
League World Series. Istillwant to
play in the Little League World Se-
ries. (I can’t. Those kids are so
much better than I am. I’d be a
benchwarmer at best.)
But those happy highlights from
Williamsport, Pa., obscure a widen-
ing problem with youth sports
throughout this country—in virtu-
ally every game, not just Little
League.
Youth sports in America needs a
reset.
We’ve all read the cautionary
tales about the manic world of se-
lective youth travel teams, of one-
sport specialists with helicopter
parents willing to spend thousands
of dollars in the hope a child’s tal-
ent can be converted into a college
scholarship.
At the same time, and not unre-
lated, more kids are bailing early
on organized sports—undone by
the pressures, financial hurdles, or
injuries.
The statistics are troubling. A
survey conducted by the Aspen In-
stitute and the Utah State Families
in Sports Lab found that overall
youth team sports participation in
the U.S. is in decline—just 38% of
kids are playing team sports today,
down from 45% a decade ago. The
average kid is quitting youth sports
after less than three years—at age
11.
This is getting attention from
adults in charge. If you’re watching
the Little League World Series, you
may have seen commercials on
ESPN for the Aspen Institute’s
Project Play 2020 “Don’t Retire,
Kid” initiative, in which frustrated
child athletes announce they are
quitting youth sports.
For those children whodokeep
playing, money becomes a factor.
Team fees, travel costs, coaching,