Farmer’s Weekly – 23 August 2019

(Kiana) #1
23 August 2019 farmer’sweekly 19

Therecentinterregionalflock
competitioninTarkastaddemonstrated
thattherewasa markedimprovement
inthequalityofwoolsheepproduced
intheformerCiskeiandTranskei
regionsbycommunalwoolproducers.
ThiswasaccordingtoGawievanWyk,
an adviser at the South African
National Wool Growers’ Association
(NWGA) in the Northern Cape.
Van Wyk, who was a judge at
the recent competition, which was
organised by the NWGA, first officiated
at the competition six years ago.
“Since then, the quality has improved
by leaps and bounds. By far the
majority of the animals entered six
years ago were of a very poor standard.
“This year, about 85% of the animals
could be classed as exceptional. The
rest was of good quality,” he said.
The competition formed

partoftheNWGAGenetic
ImprovementProgramme.
Farmer’sWeeklypreviously
reportedthattheNWGAsuccess
storystartedin 1997 whenthe
industryembarkedonitsagricultural
developmentprogramme.The
objectivewastodevelopstructures
incommunitiesthatfarmerscould
usetoimproveproduction.
TheNWGAfocusedontraining,
infrastructuredevelopment,efficient
marketingofwoolandthegenetic
improvementofsheepflocks.
NWGAstatisticsshowedthat
the1997/1998woolsalescreatedan
incomeofR1,5millionforcommunal
farmers.Theysold 222 610kgwoolvia
theformalwoolmarketstructures
atthetime.In2012/2013,nearly
3,5million kilogram of wool to the
value of more than R130 million was

producedandsold.Inthe 2017/
season, production amounted to
5,4 million kilogram. This provided
communal farmers with an
income of nearly R384 million.
According to Van Wyk, communal
farmers were faced with a set of unique
problems. They had to manage their
flocks in co-operation with as many
as 20 other producers on the same
piece of land. The infrastructure in
communal areas also left a lot to be
desired, and predation posed a real
danger, with sheep needing to be
kraaled at night to safeguard against
predators. “Despite these difficulties,
producers have succeeded in breeding
sheep that were structurally sound,
genetically advanced, early maturing
and with high reproduction rates. The
quality of the wool is outstanding,”
Van Wyk added. – Annelie Coleman

Wool

Communal wool producers excel at flock competition


TheSouthAfricanWooland
MohairBuyers’Association
(SAWAMBA)hasdecidednot
totakepartinwoolauctionsin
SouthAfricauntilfurthernotice.
ThiswasaccordingtoPaul
Lynch,a directoratSAWAMBA.
“Thisaction,resultingfromthe
foot-and-mouthdisease[FMD]
outbreak,whichhasthrown
wooltradingindisarray,has
notbeentakenlightlyaswe
fullyunderstandtheimpactit
hasonproducers,”hesaid.
AccordingtoLynch,this
decisionwastakenduetoChina’s
banonimportingwoolfrom
SouthAfricafollowingtheFMD
outbreakearlierthisyear.In
normaltradingcircumstances,
SAWAMBAbuyerswouldreceive
fundsfrombuyersinChina
betweenfourtosevenweeks
afterbuyingwool.However,
thebanhadresultedinthese
buyersnowonlyreceivingtheir
moneyfourmonthsafterthey
hadalreadypaidforthewool.


Wool


Wool and mohair buyers to avoid wool auctions in SA


“This is because, due to the
FMD outbreak, a new health
certificate has been negotiated,
which incorporates time and
temperature restrictions that
will inactivate any FMD virus.
This means that wool must be
stored at 4°C for four months,
18°C for four weeks, or 37°C for
eight days from the receiving
date,” said Lynch. “With the
temperatures we are experiencing
at present, this would mean that
the [buying] houses would only
receive their funds four months
after the date of purchase.”
South Africa’s very high
interest rates made it expensive
to fund wool for four months
and, because of the present
value of wool, there was not
sufficient funds available.
Lynch said Chinese clients
were not prepared to take the
risk of paying for wool and only
receiving it four months later, as
the market may have depreciated
by as much as 10% in the interim.

“Unfortunately, uncertainty still
clouds the announcement in July
by the General Administration
of Customs of the People’s
Republic of China, subsequent
to their risk assessment of the
FMD situation in South Africa,
that they are lifting the ban
on imported cloven-hoofed
animals and their products.
This applies to all areas of South
Africa, apart from Limpopo, the
Ehlanzeni area of Mpumalanga
and the Umkhanyakude area of
KwaZulu-Natal. However, our
understanding is that all wool
outside these [listed] areas can
be shipped as normal. Wool from
[these] areas is bound by the time
and temperature restrictions.”
While South African buyers
exported to other international
markets besides China, these
could not absorb the balance
of the wool clip not sold to
China, which accounted for over
70% of all wool sold in South
Africa. – Roelof Bezuidenhout
Free download pdf