The New York Times International - 29.08.2019

(Barry) #1

2 | T HURSDAY, AUGUST 29, 2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES INTERNATIONAL EDITION


page t wo

than a year in advance, and by the time
it opened, he was already moving up in
the photography world.
While at Compo, Mr. Suero had re-
ceived a side assignment to photograph
a children’s event sponsored by Hano-
ver Bank. Max Lowenherz, who owned
the Three Lions Picture Agency, saw Mr.
Suero’s photos in the bank window,
asked who the photographer was and
hired him.
It was Mr. Suero’s first professional
job as a photographer, his son said, and
he was eager to make his mark. So he
proposed taking a series of pictures of
the young Senator John F. Kennedy and
his new wife, Jacqueline. Mr. Lowenherz
was not interested because so many oth-
ers were writing about the couple. But
he said that if Mr. Suero could find a pub-
lication willing to run his pictures, he
would agree.
Mr. Suero pitched the idea to McCall’s

He photographed Shirley MacLaine
dancing with Rudolf Nureyev at a party
in Malibu. He shot the actor Dennis Hop-
per and the singer Michelle Phillips dur-
ing their eight-day marriage, including
a joint-smoking moment in the bathtub
(both were fully clothed). And he caught
Princess Margaret all but swooning
over Paul Newman as Alfred Hitchcock
stared straight ahead.
The photographer Orlando Suero
chronicled the lives of stars from 1962 to
the mid-1980s, as the golden age of Hol-
lywood dipped into its twilight. He took
particular delight in capturing celebri-
ties with each other, in their element or
not. But he was perhaps best known for
his portraits.
Among his more stunning photo-
graphs was one of an elegant Jacqueline
Kennedy in a gown lighting candles at a
formal dinner table in Washington in



  1. Mr. Suero called it his Iwo Jima
    photo — his career-defining shot.
    Mr. Suero died on Aug. 19 at a nursing
    home in Los Angeles. He was 94.
    His death was confirmed by his son
    Jim, who said he had survived a number
    of strokes.
    Mr. Suero, a native New Yorker,
    started taking pictures at 14 with a used
    Kodak Jiffy camera given to him by his
    father. He was soon working at camera
    shops and photo labs, including Compo
    Photo Color in Times Square. There he
    printed images for “The Family of Man,”
    Edward Steichen’s monumental 1955
    exhibition at the Museum of Modern
    Art. He had printed the images more


magazine, which loved it. The young
photographer ended up spending five
days with the newlywed Kennedys at
their modest red-brick home in the
Georgetown neighborhood of Washing-
ton on the carefree cusp of an extraordi-
nary period in American history.
His photos showed Jackie kneeling in
the living room, sorting her record al-
bums; Jackie weeding the garden while
Jack, in a T-shirt, read the newspaper;
and, of course, several images of Jackie
lighting the candles at her dinner table,
one of them a frame so perfectly com-
posed and luminous that it looks more
like a painting than a photograph.
Mrs. Kennedy herself was impressed
and sent Mr. Suero a note. “If I’d realized
what a wonderful photographer you
were, I never would have been the jit-
tery subject I was,” she wrote. “They are
the only pictures I’ve ever seen of me
where I don’t look like something out of
a horror movie.”
Mr. Suero later gravitated to Holly-
wood, where he went on to make a name
for himself photographing the beautiful
people.
His favorite subjects included Natalie
Wood, Michael Caine, Sharon Tate,
Claudia Cardinale and Brigitte Bardot,
whom he photographed lounging on a
bed by the ocean and, later, dressed as
Charlie Chaplin.
His lens also caught Jack Nicholson,
Julie Andrews, Faye Dunaway, Robert
Redford and Diana Ross.
He served as a still photographer on
movie sets, including “Torn Curtain”
(1966), “Hell in the Pacific” (1968), “Play
It Again, Sam” (1972), “Lady Sings the
Blues” (1972), “Chinatown” (1974) and
“The Towering Inferno” (1974).
In the midst of all the glamour, Mr.
Suero, who had served in the Marines

during World War II, suffered from post-
traumatic stress disorder. He found
comfort and joy in taking pictures, but
when he wasn’t working he could sink
into depression.
“When you come back, the war does-
n’t end for you,” he wrote in “Orlando:
Photography” (2018), a collection of his
photographs.
“It stays with you for life for the most
part,” he added. “Photography was my
solace.”
Orlando Vincent Suero was born in
New York on May 30, 1925. His father,
Vicente Andres Suero y Seoane, origi-
nally from Cuba, was a nightclub man-
ager in Manhattan and Miami, and his
mother, Ofelia (Dominguez Ayala)
Suero, originally from Mexico, was a
homemaker.
Orlando’s first job was as a copy boy
at The New York Times, where one day
in 1943, at the age of 17, he got a surpris-
ing break.
He had been despairing at how clue-
less the older writers sounded in de-
scribing the red-hot trumpeter Harry
James and his band, so the editors asked
him to write his own story about a James
concert at the Paramount.
Mr. Suero joined the Marines that
year and headed to the South Pacific
with the Sixth Marine Division. He was
shot in the arm, received a Purple Heart
and was discharged in 1945. He returned
to New York and attended the New York
Institute of Photography, now an online
school.
He met his future wife, Margaret Ann
Greenslade, after the war. They married
in 1951. In addition to their son Jim, she
survives him, as do their daughter,
Wendy Breuklander; another son,
Chris; four grandchildren; and three
great-grandchildren.

Jacqueline Kennedy from a series that Orlando Suero shot of her and John F. Kennedy, while he was a senator, at their home in 1954. Below, Mr. Suero in a self-portrait around 1974.


LOWENHERZ COLLECTION OF KENNEDY PHOTOGRAPHS, PEABODY ARCHIVES, THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, ORLANDO SUERO, PHOTOGRAPHER

Chronicler of Hollywood stars


ORLANDO SUERO
1925-


BY KATHARINE Q. SEELYE


Richard Booth, who collected a million
titles to transform a fading 12th-century
Welsh market town into a mecca for sec-
ondhand-book fanciers, and who cele-
brated his improbable success one April
Fools’ Day by crowning himself with a
title he concocted — “King Richard
Coeur de Livre” — died on Aug. 20 in Cu-
sop, Wales. He was 80.
An obituary placed by his family in
The Hereford Times said that Mr. Booth
“died peacefully at home” in Cusop, a
village that straddles the border be-
tween England and Wales and adjoins
his so-called kingdom of Hay-on-Wye,
where he had made a career of playfully,
and often constructively, disturbing the
peace.
“Booth is, with justification,” Jane
Frank of Griffith University in Australia
wrote in a 2018 study of regional eco-
nomic development, “regarded as the
person single-handedly responsible for
reviving, with immense charm, this dy-
ing Welsh country town and leading the
international Book Town Movement
with enormous dedication.”
His face framed by mussed black hair
and black-rimmed glasses, Mr. Booth
was what The Guardian described ap-
provingly as “a British eccentric of the
best kind”: an Oxford-educated Barnum
of books who, the newspaper wrote,
“never reined in his passion for the eye-
catching and entertaining, the wacky
and the wonderful.”
Tapping inherited wealth and capital-
izing on fire-sale bargains offered by
cash-hungry colleges, monasteries,
bankrupt distributors and crumbling
country estates, Mr. Booth in the early
1960s embarked on a quixotic wholesale
buying spree.
He imported hundreds of thousands
of secondhand books to his adopted
hometown, filling six of his own stores,
spawning nearly 30 others and, in 1988,
inspiring Hay’s first annual literary fes-
tival, which drew tens of thousands of
visitors.
Mr. Booth initially scoffed at the festi-
val (“I never met an author who wrote a
secondhand book,” he said at the time),
but he agreed in 2014 to give his name to
an annual award from the Hay Writers’
Circle.
The festival elevated a hamlet on the
River Wye that for hundreds of years
had exported wool, corn and beef rather
than books; was never home to more
than 2,000 people; and lacked any dis-
tinctive literary rationale into an inter-
nationally renowned “Book Town.” (In
fairness, Hay had been home to the au-
thors Penelope Chetwode, Christopher
Dawson, Jasper Fforde, Iain Finlayson
and Jenny Valentine.)
“Hay-on-Wye?” the playwright Ar-
thur Miller mused, when asked to ap-
pear at one of the first festivals. “Is that
some kind of a sandwich?”
While establishing Hay worldwide as
a used-book capital, Mr. Booth also de-
veloped a reputation as a charming ide-
alist, an indefatigable self-promoter and
— despite being a former accountant —
an inattentive businessman who often
fell behind in paying his bills.
Still, he inspired other small towns
around the world to emulate his exam-
ple by accumulating mounds of books to
attract tourists and encourage eco-
nomic revival.
In 2004, Mr. Booth was named a mem-
ber of the Order of the British Empire for

promoting tourism. Richard Booth
Bookseller, with a stock of up to 1.1 mil-
lion books lining 9.9 miles of shelves,
was listed by the Guinness Book of
Records in the late 1970s and early ’80s
as the world’s largest secondhand book-
store.
His stores became inviting and quirky
places that, as one book blog recalled,
were “a reminder that sometimes if you
let things be, something amazing that
you were never looking for might just
find you.”
Richard George William Pitt Booth
was born on Sept. 12, 1938, in Plymouth,
England, to Philip Booth, an Army offi-
cer, and Elizabeth (Pitt) Booth, an heir
to the Yardley soap fortune.
He attended the Rugby School (he
said he was dismissed for cheating) and
studied history at Oxford, where his pas-
sion for books, already cultivated from
age 12 by a local bookseller, was rekin-
dled at university by another dealer.
After graduating and working for
three weeks as an accountant, he quit
and moved to Hay, where his parents
had escaped to rural tranquillity in an
estate that once belonged to a rich uncle.

“Buying a small shop in Hay-on-Wye
meant that instead of playing a minor
role in a major business, I could play a
major role in a minor one,” he wrote in
his autobiography, “My Kingdom of
Books” (1999).
He bought a former firehouse, then
warehouses and a Norman castle, and
began shipping in truckloads of books.
Copycats flourished, too.
“Booth was buying them at pennies
on the dollar in the United States,” Paul
Collins wrote in “Sixpence House: Lost
in a Town of Books” (2003), a book about
Hay, “as old seminaries went bankrupt,
as ignoramuses staffing Peabody Li-
braries sold off their treasures — be-
cause ‘nobody reads them’ — as New
York institutions like Stechert-Hafner
shut their doors, and as little old rich la-
dies died and left libraries to half-liter-
ate progeny.”
Mr. Booth’s inventory was encyclope-
dic. He furnished books for movie sets
and supplied a German town with the
manuals to replicate the Wehrmacht’s
original archive.
On April 1, 1977, Mr. Booth declared
Hay an independent kingdom and
named his horse prime minister, a stunt
that he later augmented with passports
and peerages.
While he never abdicated, by 2005 his
half-dozen stores had dwindled to one,
which he sold. He continued to operate
the King of Hay, which sold regal trump-
ery celebrating his reign.
His first two marriages were, as he
described them, unsuccessful. In the
late 1980s he married Hope Barrie Stu-
art, a photographer, who survives him,
as do two sisters, Joanna and Anne.

He crowned himself king


in an empire of used books


RICHARD BOOTH
1938-

BY SAM ROBERTS

Richard Booth in 1971. He is credited with
reviving the Welsh town of Hay-on-Wye
and inspiring its literary festival.

IAN TYAS/KEYSTONE FEATURES/HULTON ARCHIVE, VIA GETTY IMAGES

scroll through the images. Accessing the
site at a basic level is free. But users can
also sign up for two higher-tier plans
(one at $15 a month and another at $
a month) that provide access to features
like passes to art fairs and the opportu-
nity to be interviewed for an article on
the site.
In addition to sharing, art collectors
are seeking tools to organize growing
collections, connect online with gal-
lerists and curators and, perhaps, to
humblebrag about what’s on their walls.
“Collecting used to almost be like a
private club with people who were very
traditional in their privacy and comport-
ment,” Ronald Varney, an independent
fine art adviser in New York, said in an
interview this month. “Nowadays, it’s
often, ‘How much publicity can I get out
of this?’”
Collecteurs is attempting to harness
the energy of social media without all of
its associated noise, and offer a window
into the secretive and exclusive world of
private collections.
Though the amount of art in private
hands is unquantifiable, art sales have
been increasing, reaching $67.4 billion in
2018, much of it passing between private
hands.
Mr. Varney called the world of private
collections a “murky universe” since
private sales are often not reported, and
auction houses are not required to di-
vulge the names of winning bidders.
“There was a work by a very promi-
nent contemporary artist, and this work
was sold at a major sale at Christie’s a
few years ago that was featured promi-
nently in the news,” Mr. Varney said.
“After it was sold, the piece was listed as
‘missing’ on the artist’s website, be-


cause they know who sold it but not who
bought it, and that work has just van-
ished into a private collection.”
Merely by its nature, Collecteurs has
an obvious limitation: The art can be
seen only online. “Not everybody has
the resources to open a private mu-
seum,” Mr. Oralkan said. “So people are
looking for alternative options, and
those are most likely going to be digital.”
All at once, Collecteurs is trying to be
management software; a social media
platform; an online magazine with
plans for print books; and, more nebu-
lously, an online museum for the public.
Its founders say that the platform isn’t
geared toward buying and selling, but
rather it’s another way of getting access
to information about where art is.
The concept of a digital museum isn’t
new. Many museums have long been
digitizing their collections to make the
art accessible on the internet. But when
does something grow from a collection
of images online to an online museum,
and does Collecteurs qualify?
“This is really not a museum by any
stretch of the definition,” said Claire
Bishop, a professor of art history at the
Graduate Center at the City University
of New York, who has researched and
written about the effects of digital tech-
nology on visual art.
She said the lack of emphasis on re-
search, the shortage of contextual infor-
mation about objects and the absence of
extensive curation make Collecteurs
more social network than museum. The
information on the website is self-re-
ported, so it can be as robust or as lim-
ited as a collector chooses; often, col-
lectors include dimensions, medium,
artist, materials and exhibition history.
Sometimes, they add notes and can cu-

rate digital exhibitions of their works.
“If the minimum definition of a digital
museum is a collection of jpegs online,
then an online archive like Artstor is the
greatest digital museum on earth,” Ms.
Bishop said, referring to a nonprofit dig-
ital library that has amassed millions of
images for scholarly use. The use of the
word “museum,” she said, is a misno-
mer, and lends the project cachet while
misrepresenting its aims.
Mr. Oralkan emphasized that Col-
lecteurs is a hybrid platform, one that’s
driven by aspirations to change how art
can be seen and shared. “I think we re-
ally have a chance to recreate the idea of
what a museum can be,” he said. Ms.
Oralkan said, “If we’re looking at either

not being seen at all or being seen dig-
itally, digital is a very strong point to
make.”
In recent years, Instagram has be-
come a favored way for collectors to
share and search for new work. It has
also helped some artists, like Cj Hendry,
start careers outside of traditional chan-
nels.
Mr. Toscano, the private art collector,
used to rely on Instagram to seek out
artists, but he said he’s grown frustrated
with the algorithm. “Every four posts,
someone is trying to sell me something
that has nothing to do with any of my in-
terests,” he said.
Collecteurs is semi-exclusive; anyone
can join and post images, but some

members are preapproved based on the
content of the collection, allowing them
to show up in the site’s search function.
(Quality matters to the founders: “We
don’t want a Mickey Mouse collector
showing Donald Duck art,” Mr. Oralkan
said.) But not everyone is interested in
showing off what they have in vaults or
on their walls.
“People aren’t necessarily looking for
the sharing aspect,” said Justin Antho-
ny, a founder of Artwork Archive, in
Denver, a cloud-based inventory system
used by artists, collectors and large in-
stitutions for organization and manage-
ment. Users track what they have and
where the works are, along with deeds
of title and insurance papers.

“I would say there’s kind of a sexy, in-
teresting aspect to this, and a practical
aspect,” Mr. Anthony said. “The unsexy
side, the management side, is a more
common itch than the desire to share.”
Often, in fact, clients would rather
their collections not be shared.
“We were just dealing with three dif-
ferent political figures who don’t want to
draw attention to their wealth, and they
wanted to be assured that no one could
trace it back to them,” he said.
There is a function on Artwork Ar-
chive that enables sharing artwork with
the public, but the majority of users keep
their collections private or between
family and friends.
Mr. Varney, the fine art adviser, said
that there is a growing gap between col-
lectors who post their work online and
those who are “going radically in the
other direction.” One client didn’t want
auction houses to know what state he
lived in.
That kind of reticence has been the
biggest challenge for the Oralkans in
getting people to join Collecteurs.
“At the beginning, we got a lot of push-
back,” Ms. Oralkan said. “Like, No. 1,
who are you? And No. 2, why do you
want this information?”
She said that Collecteurs had institut-
ed a feature to allow people to share
anonymously, and that as the platform
has grown, it has been easier to per-
suade prospective users to join the site.
Mr. Varney said he believes social me-
dia will open up the art market and add
transparency.
“Things just sort of vanish into pri-
vate collections,” he said. “When things
appear on the market, especially older
things that have been off the market for-
ever, it’s almost like a discovery story.”

Sharing art once hidden in private collections


C OLLECTEURS, FROM PAGE 1


TOSCANO COLLECTION

From the Toscano Collection on Col-
lecteurs: “Untitled, Pylamyra (4/16/12),”
by Daniel Turner, left; and “TBT (Model
& Plans for Munster)” by Oscar Tuazon.

TOSCANO COLLECTION

RELEASED BY "What's News" vk.com/wsnws TELEGRAM: t.me/whatsnws


RELEASED


private sales are often not reported, and


RELEASED


private sales are often not reported, and
auction houses are not required to di-


RELEASED


auction houses are not required to di-
vulge the names of winning bidders.


RELEASED


vulge the names of winning bidders.
“There was a work by a very promi-


RELEASED


“There was a work by a very promi-
nent contemporary artist, and this work
RELEASED


nent contemporary artist, and this work
was sold at a major sale at Christie’s awas sold at a major sale at Christie’s aRELEASED


BY


collections a “murky universe” since


BY


collections a “murky universe” since
private sales are often not reported, andprivate sales are often not reported, andBY


"What's


few years ago that was featured promi-


"What's


few years ago that was featured promi-
nently in the news,” Mr. Varney said.


"What's


nently in the news,” Mr. Varney said.
“After it was sold, the piece was listed as


"What's


“After it was sold, the piece was listed as
‘missing’ on the artist’s website, be-‘missing’ on the artist’s website, be-"What's


News"


“There was a work by a very promi-

News"


“There was a work by a very promi-
nent contemporary artist, and this work


News"


nent contemporary artist, and this work
was sold at a major sale at Christie’s a
News"


was sold at a major sale at Christie’s a
few years ago that was featured promi-few years ago that was featured promi-News"


vk.com/wsnws


Mr. Varney called the world of private

vk.com/wsnws


Mr. Varney called the world of private
collections a “murky universe” since


vk.com/wsnws


collections a “murky universe” since
private sales are often not reported, and


vk.com/wsnws


private sales are often not reported, and
auction houses are not required to di-


vk.com/wsnws


auction houses are not required to di-
vulge the names of winning bidders.
vk.com/wsnws


vulge the names of winning bidders.
“There was a work by a very promi-“There was a work by a very promi-vk.com/wsnws


TELEGRAM:


was sold at a major sale at Christie’s a


TELEGRAM:


was sold at a major sale at Christie’s a
few years ago that was featured promi-


TELEGRAM:


few years ago that was featured promi-
nently in the news,” Mr. Varney said.


TELEGRAM:


nently in the news,” Mr. Varney said.
“After it was sold, the piece was listed as


TELEGRAM:


“After it was sold, the piece was listed as
‘missing’ on the artist’s website, be-
TELEGRAM:


‘missing’ on the artist’s website, be-


t.me/whatsnws


Mr. Varney called the world of private

t.me/whatsnws


Mr. Varney called the world of private
collections a “murky universe” since


t.me/whatsnws


collections a “murky universe” since
private sales are often not reported, and


t.me/whatsnws


private sales are often not reported, and
auction houses are not required to di-


t.me/whatsnws


auction houses are not required to di-
vulge the names of winning bidders.


t.me/whatsnws


vulge the names of winning bidders.
“There was a work by a very promi-


t.me/whatsnws


“There was a work by a very promi-
nent contemporary artist, and this work
t.me/whatsnws


nent contemporary artist, and this work
was sold at a major sale at Christie’s awas sold at a major sale at Christie’s at.me/whatsnws

Free download pdf