Trains – October 2019

(Ann) #1

over the infrastructure of the Northeast
Corridor? When something goes wrong,
commuters complain, “Oh no, it’s New
Jersey Transit again,” and it’s got nothing
to do with NJ Transit. Is that the price of
doing business?


A Unfortunately so.
With Amtrak, we have made a point of
rather than going to war with them,
choosing to try to work with them to
tackle the real nuts-and-bolts problems.
I’m big on metrics. ... You look at what the
causes are of on-time performance. We
have the biggest impact on the NEC; it’s
Amtrak signal problems and power issues
that affect us. Don’t get me wrong; I’d
rather work with Amtrak.
It would be great if we owned it. It
would be in our own destiny. However,
due to legacy, we must deal with Amtrak.
We have similar issues on the Raritan
Valley Line, where there is no temporal
separation with the freights that use the
line as well. I’d love to live in heaven, but,
living in the real world, I’d rather work
with Amtrak and Conrail.


Q How much do you worry about failure

in the current tunnels and to what extent
does NJ Transit have contingency plans?


A We’re never going to operate there in

unsafe conditions. ... I’m not worried today,
but it is obviously a serious concern.
With any particular contingency, we
have state emergency management; we
have plans. If you remember 9/11, Lower
Manhattan was cut off and the Holland
Tunnel was closed. This had an impact that
brought a negative effect on the region’s
economy. You would have to think it’s dif-
ferent but it is definitely analogous: what
would happen if the rail tunnels go out?
What would that do to the Trans-Hud-
son capacity? It’d be pretty scary and no
plan can adjust for that loss of capacity.


Q Can you update us on the status of pos-

itive train control and the biggest chal-
lenges you’re facing before Dec. 31, 2020?


A I think there are three challenges.
There’s still one which is fairly narrow,
but we’re trying to get together with Par-
sons, our PTC vendor, [on] the oldest vehi-
cles in the fleet, the GP40s. We’ve been
back and forth on getting them fully PTC
installed and compliant. ... We have had so


many repairs over the years with gaps in
documentation for these engines. In the
short term, that’s an issue and that has im-
pact on some of our service where we need
more diesels.
The two big worries are getting in reve-
nue service demonstration by the end of
this year [and] the biggest problem ...
software glitches.
You know when you’re commissioning,
you’re going to be testing and you’re going
to have these glitches which you work out
in the commissioning. If we had two years,
2½ years, that’s one thing, but all the rail-
roads are now realizing you’re still getting
anomalies. ... Every time you have to
change a software version, that means
regression testing, and that takes time, so
every month you get closer and closer [to
the deadline] and Congress didn’t end up
changing that deadline.
We have to be there by December 2020.
If you keep having software glitches, what
is the impact of that? The challenge is going
to be all inside the black box and the batch
of computer programmers who are writing
lines of code and it’s proprietary software. I
could take 50 people from here and go up
there, but they’re not going to be able to do
that computer code. It’s like trying to get
more people in a phone booth trying to fix
the phone. It’s the quality of the program-
ming. ... Where are we going to be in De-
cember and next spring? Will we still be
sorting out those glitches? If one train goes
into penalty because it gets that false signal,
that means shutting that train down for 20

minutes. The repercussions right down the
NEC on this would be huge.

Q What do you think is NJ Transit’s
greatest current unfunded need?

A First is the state of good repair of the
current system and we’re just in the pro-
cess, more than halfway through, but we
don’t have a five-year capital plan which, to
me, is pretty outstanding, pretty scary. ...
I want to have that ready by next spring;
when I go to the legislature by that time, all
of the annulments will be a thing of the
past, as well as the mechanical ones. We’ll
have a full complement of engineers so that
we go to the legislature and say, “Hey, you
gave us money, we took the money, and
spent it wisely.”
There was a backlog of existing capital
projects that we had money for, we just
didn’t have staff for. ... Those projects now,
they’re out in the open, and you saw we’re
actually up to $100 million and there’s
going to be more next year.
To your point, the priority projects go-
ing ahead, that’s where we’ll really be able
to, next spring, go to the Legislature and
say, “You gave us two years of money, now
this is what we need to really be a first-class
system. Talk is cheap, this is what it will
take for us to be a first-class system.” And
it’s going to be pretty shocking numbers, I
think, for a lot of people, and we have to
find a dedicated [funding] stream for that.
— Ralph Spielman. See Trains “News Wire”
for more from this interview.

READ THE LATEST RAIL NEWS. VISIT TRAINSMAG.COM TrainsMag.com 7

NJ Transit GP40PH-2B No. 4203 brings an Atlantic City Line train past Winslow Junction Tower.
Equipping the GP40s for positive train control is proving to be a challenge. Bill Monaghan
Free download pdf