Autocar UK – 21 August 2019

(lily) #1

Monkeying around


Like many, I am interested in the


Land Rover Defender replacement.


B e i n g a n e x i s t i n g c u s t ome r of t he


brand, I contacted my local dealer for


information. They confirmed that


they had no information but hoped to


obtain some in the next few months.


They mentioned that Land Rover


has a policy of asking for a £500


deposit in order to secure a place to


view the Defender at a launch event


when the information would be


available. The £500 deposit would


give a priority to order a vehicle. I


am amazed. JLR wants to take £500


from me to secure a place at a launch


event for a vehicle that it has not


issued any information on.


I seriously question its marketing


strategy. I am an existing Land Rover


customer but question its perception


of the strength of its brand and the


way it treats us.


David Ernest


Via email


Tra ci n g A1


I was interested to see reference to


t he r e g i s t r at ion nu mb e r A 1 i n t he


archive column (7 August).


Registration A1 was in our family


for a few years in the late 1970s


attached to a British Leyland Mini



  • not a regular Mini but a chauffeur-


driven one with a luxury interior. The


front nearside seat had been removed


and a Chesterfield-style leather


armchair installed in the rear so the


passenger could stretch out in style.


My uncle, Sir John Dent, was MD


of Dunlop tyres at the time and,


during a period of trading losses and


subsequent cost-cutting, the usual


Daimler limo was changed to a Mini


as a (token) economy measure.


He moved on to the Civil Aviation


Authority in 1982 and I believe the


registration number transferred to a


Ford Granada owned by BTR plc.


Mark Pollard


Via email


Indy over Silverstone


Regarding the letter ‘Silverstone’s


good ol’ days’ (7 August), we couldn’t


agree more that fans are increasingly


LETTER OF THE WEEK


Winning the name game


Richard Anderson is not impressed with Lotus’s


choice of the name Evija for its new hypercar


(Your Views, 31 July). I agree. But naming is an
increasingly difficult area for car manufacturers. A

bit of online research suggests Evija is a given name


of Hebrew origin, should be pronounced ‘Eviya’


and means ‘first in existence’ – which is loosely


appropriate, I suppose. But it’s still an awkward,


unattractive word that seems contrived. Perhaps


the Lotus marketing team was so excited about


the prospect of a fully electric hypercar that


they concluded the name could only start with EV.


Looking back, I think a couple of the most


attractive and appropriate names have been Cortina,


with its connotations of continental travel and upmarket sporting


activity, and Ka, a super-short name where the sharp-edged badge looked


so right on a super-short car introducing Ford’s New Edge design era.


Place names have often been used for car models, but we’re probably


running out of attractive ones that haven’t been used before. Your article


on JLR’s planned new models (News, 24 July) refers to Land Rover’s new


plant in Nitra, Slovakia. What a super name for a car. Land Rover Nitra


doesn’t quite work, but a Land Rover Defender Nitra series might.


On the topic of factory locations, I think Fiat and Ford missed a trick in


not using the name of their shared plant for one of their city cars – Tychy.


Rodger Williams


Via email


being priced out of visiting motor


racing events here in the UK. As


part of our planning for a birthday


celebration in 2020, we have looked


at a wide variety of organised trips


to a varied selection of motor racing


venues and to find that a visit to


Monaco or even Singapore for an F1


race can be sourced cheaper than a


similar one to Silverstone beggars


b e l ie f. B e a r i n g t h i s i n m i nd , w e h av e


already booked a trip to Indianapolis


for ne x t y e a r ’s I nd y 5 0 0.


Michael and Margaret Knight


Via email


Volvo’s colour blind


I have recently ordered a new Volvo


XC40 T4 Inscription but find I can’t


have it in the colour I want – even


though Volvo makes the XC40 in


that colour. Inscription is the most


expensive and luxurious specification


for this car, yet Volvo only offers it in


two greys, two blacks, a dark blue, a


silver, a brown and a white – which,


in my opinion, is a dull palette.


By contrast, the cheaper


Momentum trim includes a red,


while R Design includes a bright


blue and a red, meaning buyers


choosing the cheaper XC40 variants


get a wider choice of colours than


those spending more on the top trim.


Buyers spending more than £35,000


on a car should have a choice. Volvo’s


restriction just makes no sense.


My local Volvo dealership, Caffyns


Eastbourne, can’t get me an answer


and the only response I could get


from Volvo UK’s frosty customer


relations was: “That’s just the way it


is.” But the question of why remains.


Edmond Burchell


Via email


Jaguar exclusive


We have seen the Jaguar brand
extended and diluted in the quest

for volume and profit. The SUV


and executive car segments are


particularly competitive and


dominated by huge multinational


manufacturers. Jaguar is known as


an exclusive brand with apt phrases


such as ‘Grace, space and pace’ and


known for making beautiful fast cars.


My advice would be for Jaguar


to reduce volume aspirations and


become a low-volume manufacturer


of the finest quality, really special


exclusive cars that are reassuringly


expensive and that we would


aspire to own one day.


Andrew Jeffery


Denby Dale, West Yorkshire


WIN


Letter of the week


wins this ValetPRO


exterior protection


and maintenance kit


worth £48


62 AUTOCAR.CO.UK 2 1 AUGUST 2 019


Has British GP become too exclusive?


You’ll have to pay (less) for a red XC40


YOUR VIEWS


WRITE TO


[email protected]

Free download pdf