Farmer’s Weekly – 30 August 2019

(Amelia) #1

Weekly neWsWrap


16 farmer’sweekly 30 August 2019


Adverseclimaticconditions,suchas
widespreaddrought,haveresulted
inmanyfarmersfallingbehindin
theirpaymentsordefaultingon
debtandcredit,whichnegatively
affectedtheircreditprofiles.
ThiswasaccordingtoChris
vanRensburg, CEO of Kudough
Credit Solutions, who told Farmer’s
Weekly that it was vital for producers
who were falling behind with
payments as a result of environmental
factors to approach lenders and
inform them of the situation.
Creditors were usually prepared
to explore alternative repayment
avenues and to negotiate revised
payment plans, he said. Many financial
institutions would look at restructuring
loan terms for a specific period to
lighten the pressure on producers who

wereunabletomeettheirrepayments
due to environmental challenges.
“There are multiple factors that
need to be considered, such as the
cash-flow budget, historic production
[performance], gross production costs,
gross income, as well as individual
farmer’s unique profiles, to determine
repayment ability,” Van Rensburg said.
It was, nonetheless, of the essence
that producers maintained a good
credit record. A credit profile was about
more than simply a credit score on a
loan application to a bank, he added.
Under normal circumstances, it was
vital to ensure that, among other issues,
accounts were being paid timeously,
and excessive debt levels were avoided
so as to maintain a good credit score.
A higher credit score increased the
chances of approval by lenders.

Monitoringscoresalsoenabled
farmers to keep track of any drastic
changes on their profiles and detect
identity theft, Van Rensburg said.
Credit scores were valuable tools in
planning finances more effectively,
allocating resources to required
areas of the farming business and
improve budgeting, and creating
an awareness of financial fitness.
“Even if a producer qualifies for a
loan, [an] interest rate is still based
on a credit score. An improved
credit score increases the ability
to negotiate better rates with
banks and loan providers.
Improved rates on vehicles, new
and refurbished equipment
and property will, in the long
run, result in considerable
savings.” – Annelie Coleman

Financial

‘Maintaining a good credit record can benefit farmers’


AfriForumhaslaida chargeof
fraudattheKomatipoortpolice
stationagainstSingoConsulting.
Accordingtoa statementby
AfriForum,thiswasdoneina
bidtohaltthedevelopmentof
a plannedcoalmineinclose
proximitytotheKrugerNational
Park,whichtheorganisationsaid
couldhavedireconsequences
fortheimmediateenvironment,
andthreatenjobsinthearea.
Thestatementsaidthat
thecompanyhadallegedly
committedfraudintheformof
plagiarisminitsenvironmental
impactassessment(EIA),which
AfriForumclaimedmatched
anotherEIAwordforword.
Theproposed 18 000ha
miningoperationcould
have“enormousdestructive
consequences”fortheimmediate
environment,theCrocodile
River,otherwatersources,nature
reserves,wildlife,andtheroad
networkinMpumalanga.
Thestatementalsosaidthat
AfriForum had received the EIA


onlyaftertheorganisation’slegal
teamhadsenta lettertoSingo
ConsultingandManzolwandle
Investments,despitebeing
registeredasaninterestedparty.
LambertdeKlerk,thehead
ofenvironmentalaffairsat
AfriForum,saidit wasbrought
totheorganisation’sattention
thatthecompanieshad
allegedlycommittedfraud.
“Ibelievethat,withan
in-depthinvestigation,more
violationswillcometolight.
Uptonow,wehavenotbeen
trulyinformedofevents,while
theprocessesbeingfollowed
areinsufficient.AfriForum
requestedanextensionto
submit[its]commentary,but
therequestfellondeafears.”
TheSouthernAfricanAgri
Initiative(SAAI)alsojoined
thebidasaninterestedparty
toopposethedevelopment.
FrancoisRossouw,CEOof
SAAI,saidthatabout7 000people
wereemployedintheagriculture
sector in the 18 000ha area, and

environment

Alleged fraud in bid for new mine near Kruger National Park


the establishment of the mine,
which would only employ about
150 people, would thus result in
significant job losses in the area.
He said the area earmarked
for the mine consisted mainly
of irrigation farms and other
export industries that employed
a large number of workers, and
this was far more sustainable
than the planned mine.
“Initial calculations indicate
that a once-off yield at a
stripping ratio similar to other
anthracite mines in the Vryheid
formation north of Swaziland,
will not be viable. Moreover,
the land will be left barren and
dead for centuries to come.
“This once-off yield, as well
as damage to the water table,
ecology and tourism, should be
weighed up against the current
agriculturalactivitiesinthe
area,whichcanyielda growing
income of more than R100000/ ha
per year after deductions
for an indefinite time,” said
Rossouw. – Pieter Dempsey
Free download pdf