The Wall Street Journal - 16.08.2019

(Nancy Kaufman) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. ** Friday, August 16, 2019 |A


FIRST AND FOREMOST| By Matt Gaffney


TheWSJDailyCrossword|Edited by Mike Shenk


12345 678910 111213
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35
36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46
47 48
49 50 51 52
53 54 55 56 57
58 59 60 61 62 63
64 65 66
67 68 69

The answer to
this week’s contest
crossword isanoted
U.S. politician of the
past.
Across
1 Rap retinue
6 Tarot card
numbered XIII
11 “There ___ God!”
14 Find despicable
15 Sleep issue
16 Scarcely any
17 Tommy Lee
Jones’s role in
“Lonesome Dove”
19 ___-hoo
(chocolate drink
since 1928)
20 7-6 for Simona
Halep, say

Previous Puzzle’s Solution

21 Opposite of
paleo-
22 “___ Merry Way”
(1948 comedy
film)
24 “Dick Tracy”
cartoonist
28 Nation whose
flag features the
Thunder Dragon
31 Give in
32 Ad character
originally played
by Willard Scott
36 N.Y. rep. in D.C.
37 “D’accord”
38 Number in many
film titles
40 Abolitionist cited
by Martin Luther
King

47 Played a part
48 Get in the way of
49 Grammy winner
for “Ain’t That
Lonely Yet”
53 Dentist’s
command
54 F follows them
55 Gusto
58 “___ understand
it...”
59 “American
Gigolo” star
64 Scope of
knowledge
65 University whose
theology school
is named for
Coca-Cola’s
founder
66 Ahead

67 Physics unit
68 Ignoramuses
69 Breadths
Down
1 Canine quartet
2 Penetrating
wind
3 No longer
functional
4 Yard material
5 Screw up
6 Gymnast
Dominique
7 Where to catch
“The Seas with
Nemo & Friends”
8 Carrier to Tokyo
9 ___ Aviv
10 Fluorine or
chlorine, e.g.
11 Lead-in to a
suggestion
12 Summer
Olympics host
before Barcelona
13 “Don’t say ___!”
18 Standing upright
23 “The Big Easy”
24 Org. that runs
the “L”
25 Computer that
said “Affirmative,
Dave. I read you.”
26 Chanteuse
Gormé
27 “___ Bravo”
(John Wayne
movie)
28 Chantelle product
29 Owl howl

30 Bringing freedom
to
33 Emotionally
volatile
34 Mutt
35 Conked out
39 Outrage
41 Heart readouts,
for short
42 Relegated to
outsider status,
in modern lingo
43 Many an NYPD
worker
44 Stingy sort
45 “I ___ Rock”
46 A 45’s 45, e.g.
49 Rapper at
Raptors games
50 Less naive
51 Earth tone, in
England
52 All in ___ work
55 First letter in
“Zeus”
56 Meteorite metal
57 ___ up
(invigorates)
60 Brief form of
“Not that anyone
asked, but...”
61 Many an NYPD
worker
62 Paraguayan pair
63 Business page
fig.

s
Email your answer—in the subject line—[email protected]
by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time Sunday, August 18. A solver selected at random
will win a WSJ mug. Last week’s winner: David Jeand’Heur, Mt. Sinai, NY.
Complete contest rules atWSJ.com/Puzzles. (No purchase necessary.
Void where prohibited. U.S. residents 18 and over only.)

EDGE ORSO STPAT
MAPLEGEND UR I CH
UNSULL I ED PESC I
D I ANASPENCER
ACHE L I D ARDENT
POE BAN ALB STY
PURGE AKELA
PRANCEDAROUND
SCOLD OKI ES
ASP HMS GYM NAP
SCAMP I HOE WARY
SOLARCHARGER
I RATE ELDORADOS
SECTS WOODSTOCK
TREYS SSNS HEDY

PUZZLE
CONTEST

Weather
Shown are today’s noon positions of weather systems and precipitation. Temperature bands are highs for the day.

City Hi Lo W Hi Lo W City Hi LoW Hi LoW

Today Tomorrow Today Tomorrow

City Hi Lo W Hi Lo W

Anchorage 72 54 pc 72 55 s
Atlanta 95 71 s 97 72 s
Austin 100 73 s 100 76 s
Baltimore 86 71 pc 90 72 pc
Boise 88 58 s 87 62 s
Boston 7565pc 7768t
Burlington 80 67 pc 81 68 t
Charlotte 92 70 s 94 72 pc
Chicago 81 66 t 84 72 t
Cleveland 81 68 pc 84 68 pc
Dallas 100 77 s 99 79 pc
Denver 8760pc 9060pc
Detroit 81 68 sh 85 70 pc
Honolulu 90 78 sh 91 78 pc
Houston 96 78 pc 94 79 t
Indianapolis 81 69 pc 85 70 pc
Kansas City 85 69 t 88 70 t
Las Vegas 110 80 s 106 76 s
Little Rock 96 74 s 96 76 c
Los Angeles 86 63 pc 81 61 pc
Miami 92 79 pc 92 79 t
Milwaukee 78 65 pc 82 70 pc
Minneapolis 80 64 c 84 67 t
Nashville 93 71 s 97 73 pc
New Orleans 93 77 pc 90 78 t
New York City 78 70 pc 82 73 pc
Oklahoma City 99 75 pc 95 75 pc

Omaha 82 65 pc 84 70 pc
Orlando 86 74 t 90 75 t
Philadelphia 85 73 pc 89 74 pc
Phoenix 110 85 s 108 82 pc
Pittsburgh 82 66 pc 85 69 pc
Portland, Maine 70 60 pc 73 64 c
Portland, Ore. 77 63 pc 75 60 s
Sacramento 103 62 s 90 60 s
St. Louis 86 72 t 90 77 pc
Salt Lake City 90 66 s 91 69 s
San Francisco 81 60 pc 76 62 pc
Santa Fe 90 57 s 90 57 s
Seattle 74 61 pc 74 61 s
Sioux Falls 81 62 pc 83 63 t
Wash., D.C. 88 75 pc 93 77 pc

Amsterdam 71 61 c 71 59 r
Athens 90 76 s 88 71 s
Baghdad 111 80 s 107 80 s
Bangkok 94 80 t 92 79 t
Beijing 87 66 s 90 65 s
Berlin 71 56 t 77 63 pc
Brussels 72 62 pc 72 61 r
Buenos Aires 68 53 pc 64 42 r
Dubai 109 93 s 107 91 s
Dublin 71 53 r 65 51 pc
Edinburgh 68 55 r 64 52 sh

Frankfurt 74 59 pc 73 63 c
Geneva 75 57 pc 83 62 pc
Havana 92 74 pc 91 74 pc
Hong Kong 91 82 t 91 81 t
Istanbul 82 69 pc 81 69 pc
Jakarta 92 76 pc 91 74 s
Jerusalem 89 67 s 84 69 s
Johannesburg 77 49 s 79 45 s
London 67 59 r 71 56 c
Madrid 97 67 s 99 66 s
Manila 89 81 t 89 81 t
Melbourne 59 43 r 62 53 s
Mexico City 77 58 t 76 57 t
Milan 86 66 pc 88 67 pc
Moscow 65 57 sh 66 57 sh
Mumbai 87 80 sh 87 79 pc
Paris 80 62 pc 73 63 r
Rio de Janeiro 77 60 s 81 64 s
Riyadh 112 80 s 109 77 s
Rome 85 66 s 85 65 pc
San Juan 90 79 pc 89 78 sh
Seoul 87 74 pc 85 69 pc
Shanghai 95 80 pc 97 80 s
Singapore 89 82 pc 90 81 pc
Sydney 75 52 s 66 49 s
Taipei City 96 81 t 95 80 t
Tokyo 9183pc 9482s
Toronto 7865pc 8266t
Vancouver 71 55 pc 71 56 c
Warsaw 76 55 t 78 59 pc
Zurich 75 53 pc 77 58 pc

Today Tomorrow

U.S. Forecasts


International


City Hi LoW Hi LoW

s...sunny; pc... partly cloudy; c...cloudy; sh...showers;
t...t’storms; r...rain; sf...snow flurries; sn...snow; i...ice
Today Tomorrow

Warm

Cold

Stationary

Showers

Rain

T-storms

Snow

Flurries

Ice

<
0s
10s
20s
30s
40s
50s
60s
70s
80s
90s
100 +

AAAh g ll

JJk

Little Rock

Charlotte

LouL ill

Pittsburgh

ewYYYYYk
Salt Lake CityLake City

Tap

hill
Mempphi

CityCCC

Paso D

Billings

PorP d

n

ldd

Atl t

ew Orleans

Ph i
San Diego

Los AnAA l

Las
Vg

i p/pls /.Pa

.Lou

CCCh g

CharlesCh l t higon D.CDCCC

k t d

h

Indianapolis

CC d

l

Ati

l
k

AAbqq

h

Oklahoma Citklkhoma CCy

nAA i

es Moines

oux Fll

JacksonBirmingham

Cheyenney Philahil d l hdph

anta Fe

Colorado
Springs

PP

hd
liihg

Tc

Abnyny

Topk

C b

Atg

Ft. Worth

g

Springpifildg

bil

TToronto

t

ip

VV CC aryr

d

Anchorage Honolulu

Jacksonville

Little Rock

Charlotte

Louisville

Pittsburgh

New York
Salt Lake City

Tampa

Nashville
Memphis

Detroit

Kansas
City

El Paso Dallas

Billings

Portland

Miami

San Francisco

Sacramento

Orlando

Atlanta

New Orleans
Houston

Phoenix
San Diego

Los Angeles

Las
Vegas

Seattle

Boise

Denver

Mpls./St. Paul

St. Louis

Chicago

Washington D.C.

Boston

Charleston

Milwaukee Hartford

Wichita

Indianapolis

Cleveland

Buffalo

Austin

Helena
Bismarck

Albuquerque

Omaha

Oklahoma City

San Antonio

Des Moines

Sioux Falls

JacksonBirmingham

Cheyenne Philadelphia
Reno

Santa Fe

Colorado
Springs

Pierre

Richmond
Raleigh

Tucson

Albany

Topeka

Columbia

Augusta

Ft. Worth

Eugene

Springfield

Mobile

Toronto

Ottawa

Montreal

Winnipeg

Vancouver Calgary

Edmonton

80s

70s 70s

60s

50s

40s

100s

100s

100s 100s

100s

90s

90s

80s

80s

80s
80s

70s

70s

70s

70s

70s

60s

60s

60s

50s

80s

80s

80s

70s

FILM REVIEW|JOHN ANDERSON


ASSOCIATED PRESS (2)


‘Cola Wars’:


What’s in Your


Glass?


IS THE NOSTALGIA-FLAVORED“Cola Wars” a case of
kicking an industry when it’s down? Hardly. The American
thirst for sugary soft drinks may not be what it used to be.
But as pointed out in History’s quasi-epic of commercial
combat, it doesn’t really matter what beverage you imbibe:
If you buy it, and drink it, Coke or Pepsi probably owns it.
Or will. And that includes the great scam of the 21st cen-
tury, bottled water.
In the mid-’80s, however, the Coke-Pepsi conflict was be-
tween Coke and Pepsi. Did you drink the Real Thing? Or
were you part of the Pepsi Generation? “Remember, we’re
essentially talking about two brown sugar waters,” says one
insider, with what proves to be novel distance: Many of the
present and former higher-ups at the two companies won’t
admit—to this day—that
they’ve eventriedthe other
brand. One stops thinking
“cola” and starts thinking
“cult.” Each time the film-
makers subject a Coke or
Pepsi person to the Pepsi
Challenge (the blind taste
test that was part of a rev-
olutionary ad campaign),
it’s agonizing.
But at its most fero-
cious, the Coke-Pepsi com-
petition had real signifi-
cance. It marked a
watershed moment for con-
frontational advertising,
marketing, product placement—“Back to the Future” now
looks like one long Pepsi commercial—and celebrity en-
dorsements: Michael Jackson’s recruitment by Pepsi (for
what was a then-astounding $5 million) set Coca-Cola exec-
utives’ hair on fire, to say nothing of Mr. Jackson’s.
What made Pepsi so innovative was its precarious position
as No. 2. Coca-Cola was No. 1; Diet Coke No. 3. And there’s an
argument that Pepsi won the war: When Coke came out with
New Coke, or Coke II, in 1985, and removed its classic for-
mula from the shelf, wasn’t it conceding defeat? It was cer-
tainly a debacle. But at the same time, some in the film ar-
gue, Coca-Cola got an enormous boost of free publicity when
it introduced—or reintroduced—Coca-Cola Classic, and grad-
ually eased the “improved” formula into oblivion
One wishes “Cola Wars” took a bit of a snarkier stance
on its subject. The narration is anodyne, and the ingredi-
ents are standard-issue, even if the talking heads are very
smart and the vintage TV commercials will have older
viewers reliving their couch-potato youth. Younger people,
meanwhile, will imagine the Reagan years as one long riot
of big hair and spandex, and ask what kind of world was it
where a war between soda pops could lead the news every
night? Quite arguably, a much sweeter one.

Cola Wars
Sunday, 9 p.m., History

Cans of New Coke and Coca-
Cola Classic, above; Robert C.
Goizueta and Donald R.
Keough of Coca-Cola Co., below

T. CHARLES ERICKSON (2)

Laura Darrell and Rhett Guter,
left, and Leenya Rideout,
below, in the Hudson Valley
Shakespeare Festival
production of ‘Into the Woods’

LIFE & ARTS


(Leenya Rideout), a wolf (Rhett Guter)
and an unseen giant, is perfect, a mir-
acle of farce-comedy construction that
runs for 90 minutes but feels far
shorter, especially in Ms. Thompson’s
light-footed staging. Not so the second
act, in which we learn that growing up
isn’t easy (stop press!). It is by turns
maudlin and didactic, a combination
that has never brought out the best in
Mr. Sondheim, though Ms. Thompson
is unfazed by the mawkish sentimen-
tality of “No One Is Alone” (“Some-
times people leave you / Halfway
through the
wood/Do
not let it

Stunning Simplicity


Garrison, N.Y.
THE HUDSON VALLEYShakespeare
Festival, one of the finest outdoor
summer companies on the East Coast,
is now adding musicals to its regular
repertory of plays by Shakespeare and
more modern works in a classical vein.
To this end, Davis McCallum, Hudson
Valley’s artistic director, has brought
in Jenn Thompson, whose Goodspeed
Musicals revivals of “Bye Bye Birdie,”
“The Music Man” and “Oklahoma!”
were of the highest possible quality, to
stage “Into the Woods,” Stephen Sond-
heim’s fractured-fairy-tale parable of
innocence and experience. It’s a logical
choice for a troupe that performs un-
der a spacious tent pitched on a
wooded bluff overlooking the Hudson
River, and the results are a triumph
for all parties concerned. “Into the
Woods” gets done a lot—a whole
lot—but I haven’t seen it done
this well since the original 1987
Broadway production.
The hallmark of Ms. Thomp-
son’s version is its visual sim-
plicity: There is no set, only a
hoop, five green umbrellas, a
few wooden chairs and
crates, the plain dirt floor
of the playing area and a
natural backdrop of trees
and sky, all employed
with the utmost re-
sourcefulness. This
makes for a consis-
tency of tone and ten-
sion that helps to pa-
per over the
unevenness of James
Lapine’s book. The first
act, in which Cinderella
(Laura Darrell), Little Red
Riding Hood (Kayla Coleman),
Rapunzel (Kendall Cafaro) and
Beanstalk Jack (Brandon Dial)
are confronted by a witch

grieve you, / No one leaves for good”).
Even the very best productions of
“Into the Woods” thus have a ten-
dency to lose altitude after intermis-
sion—but this one stays exhilarating
from start to finish.
The 14-person ensemble cast is a
mix of satisfyingly familiar faces (Ja-
son O’Connell, Ms. Rideout, Nance Wil-
liamson) and exciting new finds (in
particular Ms. Darrell, the most un-
selfconsciously endearing Cinderella
imaginable). Not only can they all act,
but they can sing, too, negotiating
their demanding vocal parts without a
hint of discomfort. And despite the
fact that Mr. Sondheim’s scores are
notoriously tricky to execute, the four-
piece pit band, led by Amanda Morton,
plays this one with unflappable exacti-
tude. For a company new to musicals
to perform a Sondheim show with
such precision and self-confidence is
supremely impressive.
The audience at Tuesday’s perfor-
mance knew how good a show it was
seeing, and responded accordingly. So
did I. Not for the first
time, I went home from
one of Ms. Thompson’s
productions asking,
“Why has this re-
markable woman
never been invited
to direct a Broad-
way musical?”

Into the Woods
Hudson Valley Shakespeare
Festival, Boscobel House and
Gardens, 1601 Route NY-9D,
Garrison, N.Y. ($10-$100),
845-265-9575, closes Sept. 8

Mr. Teachout, the Journal’s drama
critic, is the author of “Satchmo at
the Waldorf.” Write to him at
[email protected].

THEATER REVIEW|TERRY TEACHOUT

Free download pdf