The Wall Street Journal - 16.08.2019

(Nancy Kaufman) #1

A4| Friday, August 16, 2019 PWLC101112HTGKBFAM123456789OIXX **** THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


The State Department’s in-
spector general said in a re-
port that high-ranking depart-
ment officials berated career
employees over their political
views, questioning their loy-
alty and retaliating against
some of them.
The Office of Inspector Gen-
eral described “leadership and
management deficiencies” by
Assistant Secretary of State
for International Organization
Affairs Kevin Moley and his
former senior adviser, Mari
Stull.
Mr. Moley, who disputed
the allegations in a response
to the report, remains in his
post, while Ms. Stull has left
the department. She didn’t re-
spond to a request to com-
ment. Both were Trump ad-
ministration appointees.
State Department Under
Secretary for Political Affairs
David Hale didn’t dispute the
report’s conclusions. He wrote
that the department had al-
ready taken action to address
management and performance
deficiencies in the Bureau of
International Organization Af-
fairs and said “further disci-

pline will be considered.”
The report cited findings
including “disrespectful and
hostile treatment of employ-
ees, accusations against and
harassment of career employ-
ees premised on claims that
they were ‘disloyal’ based on
their perceived political views,
and retaliation associated with
conflicts of interest.”
Current and former bureau
employees alleged that both
Mr. Moley and Ms. Stull “fre-
quently berated employees,
raised their voices, and gener-
ally engaged in unprofessional
behavior toward staff.”
Staffers said both officials
“made inappropriate accusa-
tions of disloyalty and made
positive or negative comments
about employees based on
perceived political views.”
Some employees said they
were accused of being mem-
bers of the “deep state” and of
undermining President Trump’s
agenda.
According to the report, the
investigation was prompted by
an article in Foreign Policy al-
leging that the political affilia-
tions and views of career em-
ployees were being evaluated,
leading to several dismissals.
Senior Democratic lawmak-
ers wrote to Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo in June 2018 re-
garding the allegations, and
the matter was referred to the
inspector general.
Rep. Eliot Engel (D., N.Y.),
House Foreign Affairs Com-
mittee chairman and one of
the authors of the letter to Mr.
Pompeo, said Thursday that
the report confirms lawmak-
ers’ fears.
“These actions are prohib-
ited by law and they are offen-
sive,” Mr. Engel said in a
statement. He called for Mr.
Moley’s resignation or termi-
nation, adding “the buck stops
with Secretary Pompeo.”
While the investigation sub-
stantiated many of the initial
allegations, investigators said
their findings are incomplete
because of the office’s inability
to compel cooperation by Ms.
Stull, who left the department
in January.
Sen. Bob Menendez (D.,
N.J.), ranking member on the
Senate Foreign Relations Com-
mittee and another author of
the letter, said Thursday that
politicization of the national
security apparatus endangers
the country.
“Creating a hostile environ-
ment at the State Department,
discriminating against loyal
public servants, and retaliat-
ing against those deemed not
loyal is a cancer at the State
Department and for career
employees across the govern-
ment,” Mr. Menendez said.
The inspector general said
it plans to release findings on
“similar allegations” in a sepa-
rate report.

BYCOURTNEYMCBRIDE

Officials


At State


Criticized


In Report


Career staffers were
berated over their
views, the inspector
general says.

attempting to interfere in Mr.
Mueller’s probe of Russian
meddling in the 2016 election.
Judiciary Chairman Jerrold
Nadler (D., N.Y.) has said the
investigation could lead to the
panel recommending the House
vote to impeach the president.
A spokeswoman for the Re-
publicans on the committee
said the subpoenas “only
waste more time and taxpayer
dollars” because they seek in-
formation already available in
the Mueller report.
Neither the White House
nor Messrs. Lewandowski and
Dearborn responded to re-
quests for comment.
Mr. Lewandowski served as
Mr. Trump’s campaign man-
ager from January 2015 to
June 2016 and remained an
adviser afterward, though he

never worked for the Trump
administration. He is de-
scribed throughout Mr. Muel-
ler’s report as having deep
knowledge of the campaign’s
operations.

Mr. Nadler is focused on
two instances in which Mr. Le-
wandowski was asked by Mr.
Trump to deliver messages to
then-attorney general Jeff Ses-
sions urging him to curb the
Mueller investigation.

In June 2017, the president
met with Mr. Lewandowski in
the Oval Office and dictated a
message to Mr. Sessions, ac-
cording to the report.
The message said that Mr.
Sessions should announce that
Mr. Mueller’s investigation was
“very unfair” and that the
president had done nothing
wrong.
A month later, Mr. Trump
asked about the status of the
message and Mr. Lewandowski
told the president it would be
delivered soon, the report said.
Because Mr. Lewandowski
didn’t want to deliver the mes-
sage personally, he asked Mr.
Dearborn to do so, according
to the report. Mr. Dearborn
had served as chief of staff to
then-Sen. Sessions before join-
ing the Trump administration.

The Mueller report states
that Mr. Lewandowski gave
Mr. Dearborn a typewritten
version of the president’s mes-
sage.
According to the report, Mr.
Dearborn recalled telling Mr.
Lewandowski that he had han-
dled the situation, but didn’t
follow through, and told Mr.
Mueller’s investigators that
being asked to deliver the
message made him uncomfort-
able.
Mr. Lewandowski is weigh-
ing a U.S. Senate run in New
Hampshire. Mr. Trump seemed
to endorse him Thursday
ahead of a campaign rally in
the state. In a radio interview,
the president said that “if he
ran, he’d be a great senator.”
—Andrew Restuccia
contributed to this article.

WASHINGTON—The House
Judiciary Committee on
Thursday subpoenaed two for-
mer Trump associates who the
panel’s Democratic chairman
said were involved in Presi-
dent Trump’s effort to impede
special counsel Robert Muel-
ler’s investigation.
The Democratic-led com-
mittee issued subpoenas to
Corey Lewandowski, Donald
Trump’s campaign manager
for much of the 2016 race, and
Rick Dearborn, onetime dep-
uty White House chief of staff,
to give public testimony on
Sept. 17.
The House is seeking their
testimony as part of its inves-
tigation into whether Mr.
Trump obstructed justice by


BYNATALIEANDREWS


House Panel Subpoenas Lewandowski, Dearborn


causes bladder cancer, which
can lead to bloody urine,” ac-
companied by a photo of a
specimen cup filled with red-
dish liquid.
The latest proposal calls for
the warning messages to oc-
cupy the top half of the front
and rear panels of cigarette
packages and at least 20% of
the top of cigarette ads.
Altria, maker of industry-
leading Marlboro cigarettes,
said it has been expecting
such a move. “We seek to
work constructively with the
agency, and we are reviewing
the proposed rule,” a spokes-
man said.
Newport maker British
American TobaccoPLC, which
owns Reynolds American, is
also reviewing the FDA’s latest

proposal, a spokeswoman said.
“We firmly support public
awareness of the harms of
smoking cigarettes, but the
manner in which those mes-
sages are delivered to the pub-
lic cannot run afoul of the
First Amendment protections
that apply to all speakers, in-
cluding cigarette manufactur-
ers,” the spokeswoman said.
Health warnings first ap-
peared on cigarette packages
in 1966 and were most re-
cently updated in 1984 to in-
clude the Surgeon General’s
warnings that appear on pack-
ages and in advertisements to-
day. The FDA argues those
text-based messages are too
small and less effective than
messages with images.
In their legal challenge, the

tobacco companies argued the
agency’s original graphic
warnings didn’t achieve the
government’s stated intent of
conveying health risks and
rather were aimed at evoking
shock and disgust. The origi-
nal warnings also included a
smoking cessation hotline,
which was outside their scope.
The new warnings use more
detailed language—warning
about specific cancers, rather
than cancer in general—and
describe some of the lesser-
known health risks of smok-
ing, such as poor circulation,
cataracts and macular degen-
eration.
The FDA will now seek pub-
lic comment on the proposal.
—Saabira Chaudhuri
contributed to this article.

The Food and Drug Admin-
istration proposed a rule re-
quiring cigarette packs to fea-
ture graphic health warnings,
including color photos of
smoking-related illnesses.
Similar health warnings are
required on cigarette boxes in
other countries but aren’t
mandatory in the U.S., where
tobacco companies success-
fully sued to block them.
While adult smoking rates
have declined in recent de-
cades, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention esti-
mate that 480,000 Americans
die from cigarette smoking ev-
ery year.
“Given that tobacco use is
still the leading cause of pre-
ventable disease and death in
the U.S., there’s a lot at stake
to ensure the public under-
stands these risks,” said Act-
ing FDA Commissioner Ned
Sharpless on Thursday.
The FDA’s proposed graphic
labels would represent the
biggest overhaul of cigarette-
health warnings in more than
three decades. The proposal is


BYJENNIFERMALONEY also a test of the rule-making
clout of the agency, after its
previous effort to implement
pictorial warnings was
quashed.
In 2012, a group of tobacco
companies convinced an ap-
peals court that the agency’s
proposed images violated their
First Amendment rights. That
group included Reynolds
AmericanInc. but notAltria
GroupInc., the U.S. cigarette
market leader.
Since 1984, labels describ-
ing the dangers of smoking
have been contained in a small
box with black-and-white text.
But the 2009 law that gave the
FDA regulatory authority over
tobacco required the agency to
issue new rules for color
warnings on cigarette packs.
The FDA’s original proposal
for these graphic warnings in-
cluded images of a body on an
autopsy table and a man ex-
haling cigarette smoke
through a hole in his throat.
The newly proposed warnings
include a large tumor on a
woman’s neck and a pair of
feet with amputated toes. One
warning says: “Smoking


U.S. NEWS


$1 million each. Another, John
Walsh, a former U.S. attorney,
is close behind.
“These are people who
want to run for Senate, not
people who are looking at the
Senate as a consolation prize,”
said Becky Bond. She is a for-
mer adviser to Mr. O’Rourke
who this week launched a new
organization called Action PAC
that plans to spend $5 million
to help Democrats win the
Senate. The group has en-
dorsed Mr. Romanoff.
Mr. O’Rourke, who was also
wooed by Mr. Schumer, simi-
larly would face stiff competi-
tion in the Texas Senate pri-
mary. M.J. Hegar—an Air
Force veteran who lost a sub-
urban congressional race by
about three percentage points
in 2018—has attracted signifi-
cant support.
“M.J., the bad-ass mom vet-

eran that she is, is best posi-
tioned to talk to everybody in
the state about how she’s will-
ing to fight for them,” said
Amanda Sherman, a Hegar
campaign spokeswoman.
Texas progressives were
galvanized this week when
Cristina Tzintzún Ramirez,
who runs a nonprofit aimed at
mobilizing young Latino vot-
ers, entered the race.
An O’Rourke campaign
spokeswoman said a run for
Senate wasn’t on the table. A
University of Texas poll of
Texans this month showed
57% of respondents wanted
Mr. O’Rourke to stay in the
presidential race, with 26%
saying he should drop out.
By contrast, Montana Gov.
Steve Bullock, a later entrant
into the presidential race who
has struggled to gain traction,
would likely dominate the

Democratic field in his state if
he decided to run against Re-
publican Sen. Steve Daines.
According to Montana
strategists, Democratic donors
have been advised to take a
wait-and-see approach in the
race so they can support Mr.
Bullock if he decides to run.
So far, Wilmot Collins—a
Liberian refugee who last
year became the Democratic
mayor of Helena, Montana’s
capital—is the only public of-
ficeholder to declare for the
race, and he raised just over
$90,000 during the second
quarter of this year. Two
other candidates have also
entered the primary. But mul-
tiple potential candidates are
rumored to be waiting for Mr.
Bullock’s decision.
“He’s popular, he’s well
known—there’s no one who
could stack up to him in terms

of name recognition or any-
thing else,” a veteran Montana
Democratic strategist said of
Mr. Bullock.
Mr. Bullock has been ada-
mant both privately and pub-
licly that he has no intention
of running for anything other
than president. A campaign
spokesman referred to com-
ments he made last week on
CNN, when he praised the
“great folks running for the
Senate in Montana” and said
one of them would have a
good chance of winning the
race, but “it won’t be me.”
“I’ve known Steve a long
time, and I think he’s made it
pretty clear he’s not interested
in the Senate,” said Nancy
Keenan, the former executive
director of the Montana Dem-
ocratic Party.
—Ken Thomas
contributed to this article.

Former Colorado Gov. John
Hickenlooper’s decision to
drop out of the crowded Dem-
ocratic presidential field and
consider a Senate run signaled
that party leaders’ efforts to
press low-polling candidates
to follow such a path could be
making headway.
Mr. Hickenlooper said on
Thursday that he would give
“serious thought” to a Senate
run. Democratic leaders have
been urging former Texas
Rep. Beto O’Rourke and Mon-
tana Gov. Steve Bullock to run
for the Senate as well. Both
have strongly disavowed any
interest in running for other
offices.
Many Democrats in those
states, meanwhile, are fo-
cused on other options and
don’t plan on waiting for
dropouts from the White
House campaign trail to de-
fine their primaries.
Mr. Hickenlooper had been
resistant to calls to oppose Re-
publican Sen. Cory Gardner by
various Democratic Party lead-
ers, including Senate Minority
Leader Chuck Schumer of New
York, though his reluctance
had softened in recent weeks.
Were he to enter the Senate
race, Mr. Hickenlooper would
face a number of well-funded
opponents who have already
launched their own bids.
“Six months ago, I decided
to run for Senate because I re-
alized how important it was to
beat Cory Gardner,” said Mike
Johnston, an ex-state senator.
Three Democratic candi-
dates—Mr. Johnston; Dan
Baer, a former Obama admin-
istration State Department of-
ficial; and Andrew Romanoff, a
former speaker of the state
House of Representatives—
have already raised more than


BYGABRIELT.RUBIN


Hickenlooper Ends 2020 Campaign


Democratic leaders


push some hopefuls


to trade White House


bids for Senate races


Former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper said he would give ‘serious thought’ to a run against GOP Sen. Cory Gardner.

CHIP SOMODEVILLA/GETTY IMAGES

FDA Pushes for


Graphic Warnings


On Cigarette Packs


Proposed warnings include images and messages such as one linking smoking to bladder cancer.

FDA/REUTERS

The onetime Trump
campaign chief and
an ex-aide are cited
in the Mueller report.
Free download pdf