- The Observer
World 11.08.19 29
How Modi’s hardline Hindu coup
threatens India’s fragile democracy
assert federal control over Kashmir
and end its semi-autonomous status.
This aim was reiterated during last
spring’s election. Modi was always
likely to do it, sooner or later. The
alarming thought of Trump wading
in prompted him to act now.
To be fair, neither Trump nor
the colonial British (whose hur-
ried 1947 independence handover
began the whole sorry saga ) are ulti-
mately responsible for what is hap-
pening today. Blame for more than
70 years of scrapping and squabbling
lies squarely with successive Indian
and Pakistani governments. Blame
for the immediate crisis lies princi-
pally with Modi, a life-long, hard-line
Hindu nationalist.
Before becoming prime minister
in 2014, Modi was best-known for
It’s tempting, though illogical, to
blame Donald Trump for all the
world’s ills. Yet was it America’s self-
aggrandising president who triggered
last week’s sudden crisis between
India and Pakistan over Kashmir?
When Trump took offi ce in 2017, his
ignorance of international affairs
was seen as potentially dangerous.
Those fears now look well-founded.
Kashmir may provide conclusive, cat-
astrophic proof.
The trouble started on 22 July when
Trump hosted Imran Khan, Pakistan’s
prime minister, in the Oval offi ce.
Despite previously accusing Pakistan
of supporting terrorism and slashing
US aid , Trump was all smiles. Why?
Because he needed Khan’s help in
cutting a peace deal with the Taliban.
Trump yearns to tell America’s voters
next year that he ended the 18-year
Afghan war and brought the troops
home.
Naturally, Khan wanted something
in return. That included US help with
the disputed, Muslim-majority terri-
tory of Kashmir, over which India and
Pakistan came to blows as recently
as March. Islamabad has consist-
ently sought to internationalise the
problem by involving the UN and
third parties. Like his predecessors,
Narendra Modi , India’s prime min-
ister, insists it is an internal matter.
Divided Kashmir, the front line
between two nuclear-armed pow-
ers, lives daily with a bitter legacy of
violent insurgency and human rights
abuses. It is where Muslim and Hindu
extremists clash. It is a place where
diplomats tread with utmost care.
But not a president with a big ego and
mouth to match. Oblivious to histor-
ical booby traps, Trump jumped in
feet-fi rst at his meeting with Khan.
“I was with prime minister Modi
two weeks ago and we talked about
this subject,” Trump claimed. “He
[Modi] actually said, ‘Would you like
to be a mediator or arbitrator?’ I said,
‘Where?’ He said, ‘Kashmir.’ Because
this has been going on for many,
many years. I was surprised at how
long ... If I can help, I would love to be
a mediator.”
Trump’s claim about a media-
tion request was immediately
dismissed by India. The exter-
nal affairs ministry basically
accused him of making it up.
Later that same day, the state
department reaffi rmed
the official US posi-
tion that Kashmir was
a bilateral issue.
All the same, analysts
suggest, Trump’s clumsy
intervention spooked
Modi. He and his ruling
nationalist BJP party
have long sought to
until a Hindu state in all but name
(or even explicitly) is established.”
In seeking to rule on the basis of
race, religion, faith and fear, rather
than on a constitutional, legal, consen-
sual , inclusive basis, Modi is arguably
a man of his times. Rough parallels
can be drawn with Trump’s identity
politics and China’s Xi Jinping , doing
in Xinjiang and Tibet (and potentially
Hong Kong) what Modi appears bent
on doing in Kashmir.
Add to that the BJP’s record of anti-
Muslim rabble-rousing, refl ected in
a rise in hate crimes since 2014, and
a violent explosion on the ground
in Srinagar and other centres looks
unavoidable. The current security and
communications lockdown cannot
continue indefi nitely. It’s also likely
external, non-state militant groups
will try to intervene.
“In Kashmir, the insurgency fi ght-
ing to undo historical wrongs and
betrayals will get a new reason to
fi ght,” wrote Haseeb Drabu , a former
Jammu and Kashmir minister. “This
time, the Kashmiri insurgents will be
morally supported even by the pro-
India parties in the region. Kashmir’s
crowded political space will get reor-
ganised into two clusters: stooges and
separatists. The middle ground has
been obliterated.”
Though popular with many in
India, Modi’s constitutional coup
undermines the federal compact and
pluralist democracy. “India has many
asymmetric federalist arrangements
outside of Kashmir. This act poten-
tially sets the precedent for invalidat-
ing all of them,” wrote Pratap Bhanu
Mehta, a leading academic , who
pointed to possible knock-on insta-
bility in Nagaland, Uttar Pradesh, and
Bengal.
As the storm he helped create rages
on, Trump is keeping uncharacter-
istically quiet. His mediation offer
has not been repeated and the US
has declined to criticise Modi, call-
ing instead on Pakistan to exer-
cise restraint. Gallingly, Islamabad’s
appeals for international support
have mostly fallen on deaf ears.
For a moment back there, Imran
Khan may have thought he had a
friend in the White House. Turns out
he was mistaken.
100 miles
100 km
Control of Kashmir
Lahore Amritsar
Srinagar
Jammu
Islamabad
Pakistan India
China
Pakistan
control
India control
China
control
Line of
control
Siachen
glacier
K2
ON
OTHER
PAGES
Modi’s acts
go unchecked
in an ever
more lawless
world
Observer
Comment,
page 42
COMMENTARY
Simon
Tisdall
Asia expert at the Wilson Center in
Washington.
“The next time there is an attack in
Kashmir, India will blame Pakistan,
regardless of the facts,” he added:
“And then the two sides will find
themselves in an immediate cri-
sis that could well escalate into a
confl ict.”
In Kashmir, hundreds of migrant
workers have fled, fearing unrest,
while thousands of villagers living
along the heavily militarised “line of
control” dividing Kashmir between
India and Pakistan have also left their
homes.
‘Prime minister Modi
said “Would you like
to be a mediator over
Kashmir?” I said I
would love to...’
Donald Trump
his shocking role in the bloody 2002
communal riots in Gujarat, when he
was state chief minister. National
leadership brought increased inter-
national acceptance and respectabil-
ity. But now the original, chauvinist
Modi #1 is resurfacing. It is an uned-
ifying spectacle.
Boosted by May’s landslide re-
election victory, lauded by a syco-
phantic press, and untroubled by a
discredited opposition, the “divider-
in-chief”, as Time magazine recently
dubbed him, seems set on replacing
India’s founding secular, federalist
tradition with a centralised, majori-
tarian, authoritarian state in keeping
with the concept of “Hindu Rashtra”
(Hindu nation or polity).
“Today, the hold of Hindutva
[Hindu-ness] has reached a new level
- a hegemony across geographical
space and social depth,” analyst Achin
Vanaik warned in June. “What is the
end goal? The fact is that a proper
Hindu Rashtra cannot be secured
The Indo European Kashmir Forum
was established in London in the late
1980s to represent the interests of
Kashmiri Hindus, who once made up
a signifi cant minority in India’s only
Muslim majority state.
The bulk fl ed in 1990 as a popular
insurgency against Indian rule took
hold. Next month, the organisation
is holding a number of events across
Britain in support of the revoking of
article 370, which it has welcomed
with open arms.
Forum president Krishna Bhan
said: “We have the support of many
British Indians, not just those who
originate from Kashmir, and several
parliamentarians. I accept that things
are a little tense between the British
Indian and Pakistani communities at
the moment but I’m confi dent that
matters will settle down. Revoking
article 370 will lead to a better future
for Kashmir.”
Underpinning Modi’s stance on
Kashmir is the growth of Hindu
nationalism in India in recent times,
exhibited in the landslide victory of
the BJP during general elections ear-
lier this year.
This has resulted in a small num-
ber of incidents where members of
minority groups, like Muslims, have
been ass aulted and even hanged for
allegedly killing cows, a sacred ani-
mal in the Hindu faith, to more prev-
alent cases where domestic airline
crews have been told to proclaim
“Jai Hind,” (victory to India) when
making announcements.
Officials claimed that it was
introduced to refl ect “the mood of
the nation”.
With no end in sight to Kashmir’s
current isolation, for Nasti the ardu-
ous wait continues.
He said: “I keep calling and calling
in the hope that the lockdown will be
lifted so that I can speak to my fam-
ily and friends and also visit soon. My
beautiful Kashmir has been plunged
into the darkness and I pray that it
will soon return to the light.”
Southall in west
London, where
some 55% of a
population of
70,000 is either
from India or
Pakistan.
Alamy
BELOW
Narendra Modi
was alarmed by
Donald Trump’s
intervention. Rex
ПОДГОТОВИЛА
ГРУППА
"What's News"
VK.COM/WSNWS