new Paid Media stream we know as
influencer marketing.
According to Wikipedia, influencer
marketing “identifies the individuals
that have influence over potential
buyers, and orients marketing
around these influencers.” These
influencers can range from people
with a few thousand followers
on social media to a few million,
depending on the market niche they
operate in. Whatever the case, more
and more brands are clamouring
to work with them, with decidedly
mixed results.
So, what makes influencer
marketing such a challenging
and inconsistent medium to work
with? There are numerous possible
answers to this question. The four
points that seem to come up most
often are lack of transparency;
uncertainty around pricing; the
challenges of measuring return
on investment (ROI) in a coherent
and consistent way; and, the ability
to meaningfully scale influencer
marketing activities.
TRANSPARENCY:
Compared to a few years ago, the
general understanding of influencer
marketing has improved significantly.
Sophisticated analytics tools now
make it possible to interrogate an
influencer’s audience in more detail,
from the geographic make-up to the
level of engagement. In theory, this
should make it possible for brands
to determine if a collaboration will
result in exposure to the right target
audience. The reality, however, is
far more complex and agencies
are exploiting this knowledge gap
to rake in huge fees for campaigns
of questionable value and not
inconsiderable risks.
For a start, it’s well known that a
number of services exist that enable
the purchase of followers (real or
artificial) on various social media
platforms, along with comments,
likes, and so on. As these services
grow in their sophistication, it is
becomingly increasingly difficult to
differentiate between genuine and
fake audiences, particularly because
the two are often blended together.
Making this process even
more challenging is the fact that
the influencers themselves may
not be aware (or choose to be
wilfully ignorant) of how much
of their following is actually real.
That’s because, in order to appear
legitimate, these bots, or robo-
accounts, as they are sometimes
called, often follow and engage
with popular, genuine accounts.
Given that influencers are generally
rated on the size and engagement
level of their audience, they have
little incentive to weed out these
impostors. Which is why many
brands don’t rely on them to provide
accurate information about the
legitimacy of their followings.
This doesn’t mean the brands
aren’t asking the question though.
According to Zine’s 2019 Influencer
Marketing Report, 93% of brands
surveyed reported they engage in
some form of audience vetting and
73% do so completely manually
without the use of technology or
third-party reports. This can be
an arduous and time-consuming
process, and one that delivers far
from perfect results. For example,
just because an influencer has a
high-concentration of followers in
a specific geographic location (i.e.
India), doesn’t necessarily mean
these followers are fake. It’s all still
very arbitrary.
PRICING:
Another ongoing challenge in
this growing field revolves around
pricing. There is no industry standard
for influencer fees, and it is likely
to stay this way. The reason for
this is that a number of factors
come into play when negotiating
mutually agreeable terms, ranging
from the size of the audience to the
specific industry and the ability of
influencers to engage with a valuable
and hard to reach audience. Some
markets, such as fashion have a
high volume of influencers, allowing
brands a breadth of choice and
therefore more negotiating power.
In more niche industries, however,
it can be a different story. Watches
sit somewhere between the two,
depending on whether we are
talking high volume fashion watches
or top end mechanical masterpieces.
Likewise, many of the influencers
themselves don’t know what to
charge for their services. They’re
also wary of promoting brands or
products that may not resonate
with their audiences or reflect their
ideals. After all, their value is derived
from their integrity and their ability
to connect with their followers in
a meaningful way. It’s a fine line to
walk between paying the bills and
selling out. Many influencers have
found themselves on the wrong side
of this line due to inexperience, poor
judgement, or sheer greed.
ROI:
As brands look to invest more
money into their influencer
marketing budgets in 2019 and
beyond, they are confronted with an
increasing urgency to demonstrate
a strong ROI. A process that is
anything but straight-forward. Just
as there are no industry standards
for pricing, it seems there is also
significant debate around what
metrics should be evaluated and
how they should be measured.
On the one hand, brands are
heavily focussed on engagement
HOW TO GET AHEAD IN INFLUENCING
INFLUENCER MARKETING / WATCHPRO WORKSHOP
watchpro.com / AUGUST 2019 / WATCHPRO 37