Finweek English Edition – August 15, 2019

(Joyce) #1

Simon’s


stock tips


Founder and director of investment
website JustOneLap.com, Simon
Brown, is finweek’s resident exper t
on the stock markets. In this column
he provides insight into recent
market developments.

marketplace Simon says


By Simon Brown

36 finweek 15 August 2019 http://www.fin24.com/finweek

Jump in


local sales


SHOPRITE


Shoprite’s* 30 July trading update was not
great, but it did indicate a better second half
to the year. This would suggest, in part, better
trading conditions, but also that management
is fixing the own goals around the fumbled IT
rollout and strike action at their distribution
centres. Over the six months to June, local
supermarket sales increased by 7.4%
and 9.4% in the last quarter alone, showing
positive turnaround and momentum. They
still face hyperinflation in Angola and internal
inflation is at 1.2%, with 9 679 products still
showing deflation. This is hurting margins as
costs are increasing, but they’re not able to
increase prices on the deflation products as
they’ll then lose customers.

Over the six months to June,
local supermarket sales increased by

7.4%
and

9.4%
in the last quarter alone.

ANGLO AMERICAN


Buyback not


the best route


With Kumba Iron Ore and Anglo American
Platinum both delivering knockout interim
results for the year ending 30 June, it was no
surprise that parent company Anglo American
did the same. But I am not convinced that the
share buyback of roughly R25bn announced in
the wake of these results is the right response
from cash-flush Anglo American. Sure, the
balance sheet is very strong, with plenty of cash,
and a buyback is often preferred over a dividend
as it escapes the 20% dividend withholding tax
locally. But I prefer buybacks when valuations
are cheap and commodities are at the bottom of
the cycle. I’d rather not buy at the top at a price
that, in the next few years, may seem overly high
for a cyclical business. As a side note, the large
diversified commodity stocks probably have
the strongest balance sheets in their histories,
with pretty much no debt and great cash
generation. My concern is that they may rush off
and attempt a major deal at a time that is likely
to be the top (or very close to the top) of the
commodity cycle – once again destroying value.
So far they’ve resisted that capital destruction
route. But share buybacks at these levels are
not much better. Rather give the money to
shareholders, we’ll pay dividend tax and decide
what to do with the money.

A waiting game


MilCo deal in


the offing


Vivo’s half-year results for the year ending
30 June were decent, but we’ve still not had
an update on potential fuel price regulation
in their largest market, Morocco. They are
seeing margin squeeze already in this market,
but this still remains the risk in the business.
Finalisation is out of the company’s control as
they wait for the king to rule on the issue. I'm
waiting for finality before taking any position
because this is a massive unknown. It’s
unfortunate as I like the investment case here
for increasing African GDP, which will lead
to higher fuel sales; and Vivo’s ability to add
further forecourt services such as fast food,
which will also boost profits.

The MilCo takeover of Clover received
Competition Commission approval. They also
managed to replace Brimstone, which was
to be the B-BBEE partner. While the tribunal
hearing is still to happen, it does seem that
the deal will go through. That said, one caveat
remains: If Clover’s performance drops, MilCo
could walk away from the deal, but I suspect
that’s unlikely. When Clover was around
2 000c I wrote that this was an attractive
punt for the deal being approved and the
stock has jumped to 2 350c at the time of
writing, and I would be taking profit here. The
deal price is at 2 600c per share.

VIVO ENERGY


CLOVER


AB INBEV


Too much debt
Anheuser-Busch InBev had some decent
half-year results with margin expansion, but
it suffers from the same problem as British
American Tobacco – too much debt after recent
large deals. AB InBev bought SABMiller for
an eye-watering valuation, considering this is
an industry struggling to grow, while BAT did
the same with its purchase of Reynolds for
an equally eye-watering valuation of $49bn.
Both companies now have large debt piles in
low-growth industries and are under pressure
as a result. They need to reduce the debt as the
merger savings are never going to be enough
in the short term. AB InBev is selling assets to
manage the debt, while BAT looks content, for
now, to trade that debt pile lower. Either way,
large deals are expensive.

Pho


to:^


Shu


tter


sto


ck

Free download pdf