ightglobal.com 6-12 August 2019 | Flight International | 27
PROPULSION
lethal if it extended its range. However, extra
range would be unusable if it comes at the
cost of the aircraft’s mission capability rate, an
area where the F-35 currently struggles.
Notably, despite several reassurances from
Lockheed over the past year, the F-35 will fail
to meet a required 80% mission capability
rate by September 2019, US defense secretary
Mark Esper said during his Senate confirma-
tion hearing on 17 July. Besides the F-35, the
goal also applies to other key combat aircraft,
including the USAF’s Lockheed F-16s and
F-22s and the navy’s Super Hornets.
“An important aspect of the adaptive en-
gine design involves reliability and sustaina-
bility,” says Stutzriem. “The threat environ-
ment involving peer competitors demands an
increase, not a decrease in overall reliability
and availability of engine components.” ■
burner, which “gives the F-22 exceptional
combat performance without compromising
mission range”.
So, as external tanks are not an option, the
USAF is looking at how the F-35 can do more
with its fuel capacity. One effort is the ser-
vice’s Adaptive Engine Transition Program,
which aims to create a novel engine with both
more power and better fuel economy.
Adaptive engines work by varying the vol-
ume of air flow that bypasses the turbine core
by opening a third stream when flying in
cruise mode. This third flow – in addition to
core flow and bypass flow – increases the en-
gine’s efficiency in producing thrust and also
creates a new heat sink within the engine, al-
lowing for further fuel efficiency gains from
increased core temperature. The result is an
engine that can play the turbofan’s efficiency
trick of running a large bypass ratio when
cruising – while retaining the raw power of a
turbojet in other situations.
The concept is not unique to the F-35 pro-
gramme. As revealed at June’s Paris air show,
Eurofighter is researching an enhanced Eurojet
EJ200 engine to improve thrust, range and per-
sistence on the Typhoon using “adaptive
power and cooling techniques”.
PERFORMANCE GAIN
The USAF believes adaptive engines could
provide 25% improved fuel efficiency, 10%
increased thrust, and significantly improved
thermal management. GE Aviation and P&W
were each awarded contracts worth $1 billion
in 2016 to develop adaptive engine demon-
strators by September 2021. GE is developing
the XA100 demonstrator and P&W the
XA101. If the programme is successful, the
F-35’s F135 engine could be swapped out for
one of the new adaptive units in the mid-
2020s.
For its part, GE announced the successful
completion of the XA100 detailed design pro-
cess in February 2019. The company believes
the engine could result in a 35% increase in
range and a 50% improvement in loiter time.
That improvement applied to the F-35C
would add 420nm – taking range for the
USN’s variant to 1,620nm.
“In the Pacific theatre of operations this is
significant, allowing either operations from
greater distances or more time to operate at the
combat edge,” says retired USAF Major Gener-
al Larry Stutzriem, now director of research
with the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Stud-
ies. “This improvement could also allow F-35s
to drop from their tanker support earlier, keep-
ing those extremely vulnerable aircraft further
away from adversary defences.”
However, a 10% increase in thrust will not
be a game-changer for the F-35, he says.
“With respect to improved thrust, there is
nothing the F-35 will be enabled to do that it
can’t do now,” says Stutzriem. “That said,
many operating features will improve with
additional thrust. For example, take-off roll
can decrease marginally with additional
thrust, and that has positive benefits.”
Ultimately, the addition of an adaptive
engine could make the stealth fighter more
B-model variant has lowest fuel capacity, allowing for missions of no greater than 900nm
F-22’s powerplants mean it can fly supersonically without afterburners, maintaining reach
US Air Force
US Navy
“In the Pacific this is significant,
allowing operations from
greater distances or more time
at the combat edge”
Major General (retired) Larry Stutzriem
Director of research, Mitchell Institute for Aerospace
Studies
FIN_060819_026-027.indd 27 31/07/2019 14:04