“The reporting is so false, biased and evil that it has now become a very sick joke,” Mr Trump said: “With
all that this Administration has accomplished, think what my Poll Numbers would be if we had an honest
Media, which we do not!”
The president’s disapproval rating climbed to 56 per cent in Fox News polling published this week. That
figure was just one point short of a record high and a five-point increase on last month.
In further ominous polling for the president, another Fox News survey found him to be less popular among
voters than Democrat presidential candidates Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala
Harris.
Mr Trump gave no examples of NYT stories which he deemed to be part of a “racism witch hunt”. But he
appeared to be reacting to the newspaper’s executive editor, Dean Baquet, telling staff he wanted them to
“write more deeply about the country, race, and other divisions” following the end of Mr Mueller’s inquiry.
The president’s recent racist attacks on four Democratic congresswomen of colour have been widely
reported by media outlets around the world. He repeatedly told Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar,
Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib – all US citizens, and all but one born in the US – to “go back” to their
own countries.
The New York Times faced criticism over its coverage of such remarks, which it labelled “lowest-rung slur[s]
... widely regarded as beyond the pale” when many other other publications had explicitly called out the
president’s racism. The newspaper sparked another backlash by headlining its coverage of massing
shootings Dayton and El Paso: “Trump urges unity vs racism”.
After reader complaints that the headline failed to convey the president’s stoking of racial divisions, Mr
Baquet held a staff meeting in which employees reportedly asked him about the paper’s reluctance to call
Mr Trump “racist”.
While Mr Baquet defended the paper’s coverage, according to a transcript obtained by Slate, he said: “I
think that we’ve got to change. How do we cover a guy who makes these kinds of remarks? How do we
cover the world’s reaction to him? ... How do we write about race in a thoughtful way, something we
haven’t done in a large way in a long time?”