The Boston Globe - 02.08.2019

(Brent) #1

FRIDAY, AUGUST 2, 2019 The Boston Globe C11


Obituaries

ByBryan Marquard
GLOBE STAFF
Good bookeditors can be as
invaluable to authorsas they
are invisible to readers, and
those writers whobenefited
fromVirginia W. LaPlante’s tal-
entswereunsparingin their
praise.
“You would send a draft in
to her and witha very deft
touch she would send some-
thing backto you that was just
a hundredpercentbetter — a
thousandpercentbetter,” said
Dr. JudithHerman, who
worked withMs. LaPlante on
booksincluding“Traumaand
Recovery.”
At Harvard University Press
for many years, and then for the
rest of her life on a freelanceba-
sis, Ms. LaPlante edited many
authors and numerous booksof
fiction and nonfiction about
subjects that included psychol-
ogy, literary criticism,and legal
matters. Eachmanuscript, Her-
mansaid,wouldleave Ms.
LaPlante’s handsmorepolished
than it had been when she jot-
ted down her first editing notes.
“You didn’t knowyou were a
good writer until she made you
a good writer,” Herman said.
“Thatwashergift,andshedid
it with grace and kindness.”
Ms. LaPlante, who also was
a mainstay of Brookline poli-
tics, serving for nearly 50 years
as an elected Town Meeting
member, was 88 whenshe died
at homein Brookline June 28
frommedical complications fol-
lowinga fall.
“My mother was really good
at figuring out what you want-
ed to say and helping you say
it,” said her daughter, the writer
Eve LaPlante of Brookline,
whosebooks “Seized” and
“AmericanJezebel” were edited
by Ms. LaPlante.
Though Ms. LaPlante helped
everyone from authors to her
grandchildrenrefine their
thoughts,the clarity she
broughtout in writingwas par-
ticularly indispensable to those
she edited, Hermansaid.
“She was working to help
you develop your ideas. She was
not imposingher ideason you,”
Herman recalled. “That’s part
of the generosity of editors in
general and, I think, of her in
particular.”
Ms. LaPlante focused on de-
tails smalland large for books
she edited — in someinstances
helping shape early ideasthat
led writers to pursue particular
topics, her daughtersaid.
As an analogy, Hermanin-
voked the pre-digital days of
photography, when prints were
developed in chemicals and re-
touchedby handafterward.
“In the old days, whenthere
usedto be darkrooms, one of
the things that wouldhappen
after a roughprint was madeis
that you wouldgo around and
touch it up with little bits of
black,” she said.
“You didn’t even know the
photo was fuzzyuntilyou saw
how it came to life, how clear it
became,onceyou touched it
up,” Herman added. “And that
was Virginia’s gift. She turned
thingsthat werefuzzyand un-
focused into something clear
and persuasive.”
Ms. LaPlante could be equal-
ly persuasivepromoting ideas,
proposals, and people in local
politics, said Arthur Conquest,
who served withher as a Town
Meeting member, and whose
own entry into elective politics
was launchedat her urging.
He had written columns for
the Brookline Tab newspaper
when “one day, in 1998,I heard
a knock on my door and she
was standingthereand asked
me if I wouldbe interested in
joining Town Meeting. To be
quitehonest I didn’t know what
she was talkingabout,” Con-
quest recalled.
More concerned with na-
tional politics, he hadn’t consid-
ered participating in local elec-
tions.
He wasn’t the only candi-
date she guidedinto politics.In
Precinct Six, she helpedlead
the “Neighbors Together”
group and was a mainstay of its
newsletter, Conquest said.
Through that group, she re-
cruitedmany Brookline candi-
dates over the years.
“She was a very, very sweet,
dedicated personwho was com-
mitted to people who don’t nec-
essarilyget support,” Conquest

said. “A lot of younger people
are in Town Meeting because of
Virginia LaPlante.”
He recalled that she also was
at the forefrontof the town’s
progressive politics. “People in
Brooklinelike to say they’re lib-
eral and progressive, but I think
you can set people like Virginia
and myself apart as being revo-
lutionary progressives, separate
from everybody else,” he said.
“You name a majorsocial
justice issue,” he added, “and
Virginiawas rightthere.”
VirginiaWilson was born in
1930 in Pittsburgh,the young-
est of three sisters. Her father
was PhilipJ. Wilson Jr., a chem-
ical engineer who also taught at
the University of Pittsburgh
and what is now Carnegie Mel-
lon University. Her mother, Vir-
giniaEaglesfield,stayed home
to raise the children.
At Bennington College, from
whichshe graduated in 1952,
Ms. LaPlantestudiedwiththe
poets Stanley Kunitz and How-
ard Nemerov, and she wroteher
thesis on the work of William
Faulkner. After graduating, she
beganher career with entry-lev-
el editing jobs in Boston, work-
ing at the BeaconPress and Lit-
tle, Brown publishing houses
before marrying Joseph A.
LaPlante Jr. in 1953.
They moved to Hartford for
his work teaching at the Uni-
versity of Connecticut Schoolof
Law, and they had a daughter
before divorcing in 1962.
Ms. LaPlante, who counted
amongher ancestors Puritans
from the Colonial era, returned
to Boston and settled in
Brookline. She began working
asaneditorwithHarvardUni-
versity Press, where she stayed
until retiring in 1988. From
then on she worked as a free-
lanceeditor.
In 1974,she married Carl
Dreyfus Jr., an insurance agent
with whomshe spentsummers
in Rockport andcountless
hourson tenniscourts. “I think
they met on the tenniscourt,”
Eve said. “They loved tennis.”
Mr. Dreyfus, who had served
as presidentof the Boston Ur-
ban League, died in 2010.
In addition to her daughter,
Eve, Ms. LaPlante leaves three
stepsons, Peter Dreyfus of
Brookline, Andrew Dreyfus of
Newton, and Tony Dreyfus of Ja-
maica Plain;four grandchildren;
and many step-grandchildren
and step-great-grandchildren.
A memorial service will be
held at 11 a.m. Saturday in First
Parish in Brookline.
“She was a very quiet person
with a sort of powerful will, and
probably would have liked to
have a louder voice herself, but
didn’t, and so she helped other
peoplefind their voices,” Eve
said.
Such an approach madeMs.
LaPlante well-suited for the be-
hind-the-scenes nature of edit-
ing as she worked on books — a
greenpenciland eraser at the
ready.
“Shealways had a manu-
script out on the kitchentable
that she was workingon,” Eve
said. “She was always writingin
her neat handwriting in green
pencil on thesemanuscripts.”
Herman,who soughtout
Ms. LaPlanteas a freelanceedi-
tor, recalled that “it was always
a pleasure working with her.”
“She had a devotion to the
craft that was really breathtak-
ing, I thought,” Herman said.
“Shewas elegant. Not in an af-
fected way, but in a very genu-
ine, down-to-earth way. And
she was funny. She just made
the wholeenterprisecheerful
and common-sensical.”

BryanMarquardcanbe
reachedat
[email protected].

Virginia LaPlante, deft,

graceful editor of books

Ms. LaPlantewasalsoactive
in Brooklinepolitics.

ByNeil Genzlinger
NEWYORK TIMES
NEWYORK — AgnesHell-
er, a prominentHungarian
philosopher and dissident who
repeatedlyfound herself un-
welcome in her owncountry,
died on July 19 while vacation-
ing on Lake Balaton in western
Hungary. She was 90.
Her son, Gyorgy Feher, said
Mrs. Heller had gone for a
swim,a favoriteactivity, when
her body was found floating in
the lake. She had beenstaying
at the summerresort of the
HungarianAcademy of Scienc-
es in the town of Balatonalma-
di.
The causeof death was not
immediately clear. The police,
Feher said,saw no signof a
heart attack or aneurysm.The
policeruledout the possibility
of a crime,accordingto the
Hungarian news site Hungary
Today.
Mrs. Heller, a prolific, wide-
rangingwriter in multiplelan-
guages, explored Marxism, eth-
ics, and modernity as well as
everyday life. Her eventfullife
includedlosingher fatherin
the Holocaust, falling into offi-
cialdisfavoraftertheHungari-
an uprisingof 1956,and, most
recently, speaking out against
ViktorOrban,Hungary’s right-
wing prime minister.
“A story is always a story of
choices,” she wrotein one of
her last essays, published in the
journal Social Research last
spring. “It was not written in
the stars that Hungary would
fare worst amongall post-Sovi-
et states or that it wouldbe the
most radicalin its elimination
of freedom of the pressor bal-
anceof power in government
and wind up witha system I
call tyranny.
“Tyrannies always collapse,”
she continued,“butwhether
Hungarianswill escapewith


their sanity and sufficient clari-
ty for a new start remains to be
seen.”
Mrs. Heller’s strong criti-
cism of the current Hungarian
governmentleft some friends
and colleaguesa tad skeptical
aboutthe circumstances of her
death.
“She was a strong and avid
swimmer,” Judith Friedlander,
a former deanof the New
Schoolfor SocialResearch in
New York, whereMrs. Heller
taughtfor morethan20 years,
wrote in a tribute to her. “Yet
somehowon Friday, she went
into the water and did not
come out.”
Friedlander called Mrs. Hel-
ler “one of Europe’s most re-
vered philosophers and outspo-
ken dissidents,both during
Communist times and again
more recently.”
Agnes Heller was born on
May 12, 1929, to a middle-class
Jewish familyin Budapest. Her
father, Pal Heller, was a lawyer
and writer who had beenhelp-
ing people escape Hungary and
the Nazi sphere whenhe was
sent to Auschwitz in 1944; he
diedthere.She remainedin
Budapest with her mother, An-
gela Ligeti, expecting to be exe-
cuted — an experience, she
said,that stayed with her per-
manently.
“A trauma cannotbe forgot-
ten,” Mrs. Heller said in a talk
in 2014, when she was award-
ed the WallenbergMedal by
the University of Michigan, giv-
en in memory of Raoul Wallen-
berg, the Swedish diplomat
who rescued tens of thousands
ofHungarianJewsduring
World War II. “You will not for-
get it even if you want to forget
it. The moreyou want to forget
it, the less you can forget it.”
Other family members also
died in the concentration
camps, and one themeof her

later explorationsin philoso-
phy was set.
Much of her writing looked
at issues of ethics and morality
and pondered the relationships
between the self and the hu-
man institutions into which a
personis born. Her earliest in-
fluence was the philosopher
Gyorgy Lukacs, whomshe en-
counteredsomewhat by acci-
dentwhenenrolled at the Uni-
versity of Budapest after the
war. She was studying to be a
scientist, but a boyfriend asked
her to accompany him to a phi-
losophy lecture.
“I sat therelisteningto Lu-
kacs and I understood hardly a
singlesentence,” she told the
journal Radical Philosophy in
1999.“ButI did understand
one thing: that this was the
most important thing I had ev-
er heardin my life,and so I
must understand it.”
She fell into Lukacs’s intel-
lectual circle and later, in the
1960 s, becamea principal
member of what was known as
the Budapest School, philoso-
pherswhosecommonlink was
Lukacs.They initiallyfocused
on applicationsof Marxism,
though most later distanced
themselves from it.
Mrs. Heller also becamepo-
litically active, joining the

Communist Party in 1947.It
was the beginningof a turbu-
lent relationshipwiththe au-
thorities. After the Hungarian
uprisingof 1956was snuffed
out by the Soviet Union, Lu-
kacs was temporarily deported
and fell into official disfavor, as
did his followers. Mrs. Heller
lost her position as a philoso-
phy professorat the University
of Budapest. She felt ostra-
cized.Peopleshe had consid-
ered friendsturnedaway from
her on the street to avoid hav-
ing to greet her.
Her relationship to official
powersin Hungary continued
to be strained,and in 1977she
emigrated to Australia to teach
at La Trobe University in Mel-
bourne.She joinedthe New
School in 1986.
She published at least 20
booksafter leavingHungary.
Sheretiredfromthe New
School in 2009.At her death,
her son said, she had been liv-
ing primarily in Budapest.
Mrs. Heller’s first marriage,
to Istvan Hermannin 1949,
endedin divorcein 1962.Her
second husband, Ferenc Feher,
another member of the Buda-
pest School,diedin 1994.In
addition to her son, she leaves
a daughter from her first mar-
riage, Zsuzsa Hermann.

Agnes Heller, outspoken


Hungarianphilosopher


LUDOVIC MARIN/AFP/GETTYIMAGES/2019
Mrs. HellerexploredMarxism,ethics,andmodernity in
herwriting.

ByMatt Schudel
WASHINGTONPOST
WASHINGTON — Corbin
Gwaltney, who broughta tough-
mindedscrutiny to the coverage
of colleges as co-founderand
longtime editor of the Chronicle
of HigherEducation and who
launched a sister publication,
the Chronicleof Philanthropy,
died Monday at his home in Po-
tomac,Md. He was 97.
Mr. Gwaltney beganhis ca-
reer as the editor of the Johns
Hopkins University alumni mag-
azine,whichhe reshapedin the
1950sas an intellectually serious
publication with provocative sto-
ries and vivid photography.
Later, while publishing
newsletters for college trustees,
he saw a needfor a newspaper
to coverthe academic world.
Working at first fromBalti-
more,Mr. Gwaltney and anoth-
er journalist, John Crowl,
launched the Chronicleof
Higher Education in 1966.
‘‘We set out withthe idea
that whilewe weregoing to


make academeour beat, we
were going to be primarily a
journalistic newspaper,’’ Crowl
toldthe Associated Press in
1984.‘‘We were going to hire
journalists to cover academe
the way The Wall Street Journal
covers business.’’
Supported by grantsfrom
the Carnegie Foundation (and
later fromthe Ford Founda-
tion),Mr. Gwaltney and Crowl
published the first issueof the
Chronicle of HigherEducation
on Nov. 23, 1966.
Published by the nonprofit
Editorial Projects in Education,
theChronicleappearedevery
two weeks and struggled to stay
afloat for the first few years.
‘‘If we’d known how difficult
it was going to be at the begin-
ning,’’ Crowlsaid this weekin
an interview, ‘‘we’d probably
never have started.’’
The Chronicle’s headquar-
ters movedto Washington in
1970 — May 4, 1970, to be ex-
act, the day of the National
Guard shootingsthat killedfour

students on the campus of Kent
State University in Ohio. The
paper coveredthe shootings
and othersensitive subjects, in-
cluding student unrest, racial
discrimination, changingsexual
mores, colleges’ investments in
apartheid-era South Africa, and
threats to academicfreedom.
After a few years, the Chron-
icle became a weekly publica-
tion and was read by morethan
90 percent of the country’s top
college administrators.
Mr. Gwaltney gave no in-
depth interviews to any publica-
tion, including his own,but was
a strong presence insidethe
company, withhis whitehair
and tailored suits. He hired staff,
assignedstories,and was the fi-
nal arbiter of grammar and style.
‘‘He was a visionary, obvi-
ously,’’ formerChronicle man-
agingeditorPhil Semas said in
an interview. ‘‘He was also very
detail-oriented. He read every
wordof every issueand did all
the layouts.He had very high
standards,whichmeant he

could be very demanding.’’
In the early 1990 s, when
Crowl retired, Mr. Gwaltney
boughthis shareof the compa-
ny and became its sole owner.
He steppeddownas editor of
the Chronicle of Higher Educa-
tion in his late 70s.
‘‘He was a brillianteditor,
the best wordeditor I’ve ever
run into,’’ Crowl said this week.
‘‘He had a great eye for design.
It was the thrillof a lifetimeto
be able to run the paperand
have it becomesuccessful.”
Howell Corbin Gwaltney Jr.
was born April 16, 1922, in Bal-
timore. His father was a lawyer.
Mr. Gwaltney’s first mar-
riage, to Doris Kell, ended in di-
vorce.His secondwife,Jean
Wyckoff, died in 1990. They
were married 17 years. He leaves
his wife of 15 years,the former
PamelaImburgia,of Potomac;
three children from his first mar-
riage, Jean and Margaret, both
of Chevy Chase, Md., and Thom-
as of Bethesda,Md.;five grand-
children; and a great-grandson.

ByHarrisonSmith
WASHINGTONPOST
Arthur Lazarus Jr., a Wash-
ington lawyerwho represented
Native American tribes for
morethan four decades, nota-
bly securing a landmark $106
millionaward for the Sioux Na-
tion as part of its long fightfor
the Black Hills of South Dakota,
diedJuly 27 at a hospital in
Washington. He was 92.
He had kidney and heart ail-
ments, said his son Edward La-
zarus,a lawyerand authorwho
chronicled the Sioux case in a
criticallyacclaimedbook,
‘‘BlackHills WhiteJustice’’
(1991).
The practice of Indian law
scarcelyexisted whenMr. La-
zarus beganhis career in 1950.
But with tutelage from Felix Co-
hen,an architect of the field,
Mr. Lazarus becamea preemi-
nentpractitioners, known for
workingwith tribes including
the Blackfeet in Montana, the
Miccosukee in Florida,the Nez
Perce in Idaho, the Oglala Sioux
in South Dakota, the San Carlos
Apache in Arizona, and the
Seneca in New York.
With a laconic, restrained


demeanor in and out of the
courtroom,Mr. Lazarustrav-
eled to tribalcouncilmeetings
across the country, offeringle-
gal advice on budgets, land
claims, and dealingswith the
federal government. In Wash-
ington, he lobbied on behalfof
Native American legislation
and helpeddraft the 1971Alas-
ka Native Claims Settlement
Act, which awarded$962mil-
lionand 44 million acres —
roughly 10 percentof the state
— to Alaska Natives.
Mr. Lazarus spent much of
his career working on the his-
toricSiouxNation case,consid-
ered one of the longest legal
battles in American history.
Passed from judge to judge
and eventually lawyer to lawyer
for nearly60 years,the Sioux
Nation case resultedin a 1980
SupremeCourt rulingthat up-
held the largest Indian land
compensation award in US his-
tory, set a standard for later
claims,and divided the approx-
imately 100,000 Sioux. Younger
leadersinsisted that the land
was never up for sale,calling
the process a sham, and the
SiouxNation wenton to reject

the money, which continues to
accrueinterest in Treasury De-
partmentaccountsand was
worth morethan $1 billion as
of 2011.
Known in the Lakota lan-
guage as Paha Sapa, the Black
Hills encompass roughly 7 mil-
lion acres of western South Da-
kota and northeastern Wyo-
ming, a mountainousregion
that was long covered with dark
pinetreesand pocketed with
gold. An 1868treaty set it aside
‘‘for the absoluteand undis-
turbed use and occupancy of
the Sioux,’’ who consider it sa-
cred.
But over the next nine years,
George ArmstrongCuster led
an expeditioninto the hills,a
gold rushbegan, and Congress
reneged on the treaty, reclaim-
ing land that is nowknown
largely as a tourist attraction
home to Mount Rushmore.
Finally, in 1979, the Court of
Claimsawardedthe Sioux
$17.5 million, plus 5 percent in-
terest, for the illegalseizureof
the BlackHills. Whenthe gov-
ernment appealed,objecting to
the interest payment, Mr. La-
zarus argued the case before

the Supreme Court, whichup-
held the paymentin an 8-1 rul-
ing. (Justice William Rehnquist
was the sole dissenter.)
The youngest of three chil-
dren,Arthur LazarusJr. was
bornin Brooklynon Aug. 30,
1926.His father was an indus-
trial engineer and business con-
sultant, and his mother was a
pacifist and adviser to conscien-
tiousobjectors.
Mr. Lazarus appeared before
the SupremeCourt for the first
timein 1959, in an effort to
blockRobert Moses and the
New York Power Authority
from seizing one-fifth of the
Tuscarora Indian Nation’s land
for a power project. He lost in a
6-3 decision,with Justice Hugo
Black lamenting in his dissent
that the government had bro-
ken faith with the tribe.
‘‘Great nations, like great
men,should keep their word,’’
he said.
Mr. Lazarus,whoalso
taughtat Yale Law School, re-
tired from Fried Frank in 1991
and thenjoined Sonosky, re-
cruited by his partnerin the
Sioux Nation case. He retired
from day-to-day work in 2011.

Corbin Gwaltney, editor of Chronicle of Higher Education


ArthurLazarus, at 92; lawyer arguedNative Americanclaims

Free download pdf