The Boston Globe - 31.07.2019

(Martin Jones) #1

A6 TheNation The Boston Globe WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 2019


WARSAW — President
Trump will visit Warsaw from
Aug. 31 through Sept. 2 to take
part in obser-
vances mark-
ing the 80th
anniversary of
World War II, aides to Poland’s
president said Tuesday.
It would be Trump’s second
visit to Poland since July 2017.
Under a right-wing govern-
ment, Poland is among Wash-
ington’s closest partners in Eu-
rope, with cooperation focusing
on defense and energy security.
Washington recently decid-
ed to add 1,000 troops to its
contingent of 4,000 troops
based in Poland as a security
enhancement for the country,
which is wary of neighboring
Russia’s military activity. Po-
land is planning the purchase


of state-of-the-art US F-35 jets.
It is also buying liquefied gas
from the United States in a
drive to cut its energy depen-
dence on imports from Russia.
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Publiclandscritictolead
BureauofLandManagement
WASHINGTON — A conser-
vative lawyer and writer who ar-
gues for selling off the nation’s
public lands is now in charge of
a nearly quarter-billion acres in
federally held range land and
other wilderness.
Interior Secretary David
Bernhardt on Monday signed
an order making Wyoming na-
tive William Perry Pendley act-
ing head of the Bureau of Land
Management. The bureau man-
ages nearly 250 million acres of
largely wild public lands and

their minerals and other re-
sources in vast holdings across
the West.
Pendley, a former midlevel
Interior appointee in the Rea-
gan administration, for decades
has championed ranchers and
others in standoffs with the
federal government over graz-
ing and other uses of public
lands. He has written books ac-
cusing federal authorities and
environmental advocates of
‘‘tyranny’’ and ‘‘waging war on
the West.’’ He argued in a 2016
National Review article that the
‘‘Founding Fathers intended all
lands owned by the federal gov-
ernment to be sold.’’
Pendley has welcomed
Trump administration moves
to open more federal land to
mining and oil and gas devel-
opment and other private busi-

ness use, and he has called the
oil and gas extraction tech-
nique known as fracking ‘‘an
energy, economic, AND envi-
ronmental miracle!’’
A conservation group called
Pendley an ‘‘ideological zealot’’
and pointed to the federal
agency’s announcement that it
planned to move the BLM’s
headquarters from Washington
and disperse the headquarters
staff among Western states.
Pendley’s ‘‘ascending to the
top of BLM just as it is being re-
organized strongly suggests the
administration is positioning
itself to liquidate our shared
public lands,’’ said Phil Hance-
ford, conservation director for
The Wilderness Society conser-
vation advocacy group.
Interior spokeswoman Mol-
ly Block denied the accusation.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

TrumpdefendsMcConnell,
attacksWashingtonPost
President Trump accused
The Washington Post on Tues-
day of being a ‘‘Russian asset,’’ a
baseless claim he made to de-
fend Senate majority leader
Mitch McConnell, Republican
of Kentucky.
Trump was asked by report-
ers outside the White House to
respond to a Post opinion piece
published Friday under the
headline, ‘‘Mitch McConnell is
a Russian asset.’’
‘‘The Washington Post called
Mitch McConnell what?’’
Trump asked. ‘‘I think The
Washington Post is a Russian
asset by comparison.’’
The article, written by Post
columnist Dana Milbank, criti-

cized McConnell for blocking
legislation to secure US election
systems against attacks by Rus-
sia or other foreign agents. Mil-
bank wrote that by refusing to
defend America against future
attacks, McConnell was ‘‘doing
Russian President Vladimir Pu-
tin’s bidding.’’
McConnell ‘‘is a man who
knows less about Russia than
even Donald Trump, and I know
nothing,’’ Trump said.. ‘‘If they
actually said that, they ought to
be ashamed of themselves, and
they ought to apologize.’’
McConnell went on the Sen-
ate floor Monday to fire back at
his critics, defending his deci-
sion to block the election-secu-
rity bill and calling the asser-
tion that he was helping Putin
‘‘modern-day McCarthyism.’’
WASHINGTON POST

President will visit Poland for WWII anniversary next month


POLITICAL


NOTEBOOK


GUNCONTROL

SenatorBernieSanders’
record on the issue is more
complicated than he let on.
Whathesaid:
“Back in 1988, coming
from a state that had no gun
control, I called for the ban of
the sale and distribution of as-
sault weapons. I lost that
election.”

Thisismisleading.Sand-
ers suggested he had a long
history of fighting the Nation-
al Rifle Association. Sanders
noted that he has a “D minus
voting record from the NRA
and as president I suspect it
will be an F record.” He vowed
that as president, he would
“do everything I can” to take
on the NRA.
But Sanders left out parts
of his record as a lawmaker
defending gun rights in Ver-
mont, a rural hunting state. In
1993, then-Representative
Sanders voted against the
Brady Bill, which mandated
background checks and im-
posed a five-day waiting peri-
od for gun purchasers.
In 2005, while still in the
House, Sanders voted in favor
of a measure to shield gun
manufacturers and dealers
from lawsuits arising from the
criminal use of their products.
In 2012, after a mass shoot-
ing in Colorado, he suggested
the federal government
should steer clear of gun con-
trol, saying, “In my view, deci-
sions about gun control
should be made as close to
home as possible — at the
state level.” But Sanders vot-
ed in favor of the 1994 as-
saultweaponsban,which
passed as part of a broad
package of crime legislation.

HEALTHCARE

GovernorJohnHicken-
loopersuggested universal
health care would not play
well with moderate voters.
Whathesaid:
“Last year Democrats
flipped 40 Republican seats in
the house and not one of
those 40 Democrats support-
ed the policies of our front-
runners at center stage.”

Thisisexaggerated.Hick-
enlooper was referring to
“Medicare for All,” the pro-
gressive plan for universal
health care. Many of the seats
Democrats flipped in taking
control of the House in 2018
were in swing districts, or dis-
tricts carried by President
Trump; most of the freshmen
who won those seats are cen-
trists and do not support
Medicare for All.
But at least two of them —
Katie Porter and Katie Hill of
California — do, and cam-
paigned on it.
In 2017, Porter said on
Twitter: “I believe in universal
coverage and I support Medi-
care for All.” Hill’s campaign
posted a video on Facebook
explaining her reasoning for
backing Medicare for All. “We
have to do whatever it takes
to get us to Medicare For All
as soon as possible,” she said.

TRADEPOLICY

Sandersblamed trade poli-
cy, apparently referring to the
North American Free Trade
Agreement, for Detroit’s de-
cline.
Whathesaid:
“Detroit was nearly de-
stroyed because of awful
trade policy which allowed
corporations to throw workers
in this community out on the

streets as they moved to low-
wage countries.”

Thisisexaggerated.NAF-
TA, which went in effect
199 4,isoftenblamedforthe
loss of American manufactur-
ing jobs in the Midwest, but
Detroit’s struggles started
well before that as global
competition increased. Auto
jobs started scattering during
the energy crisis of the
1970s and the economic
downturn of the 1980s.
Moreover, jobs in Detroit were
also lost to competition the
union-averse South, where
many carmakers sought
cheaper labor.

***
SenatorElizabethWarren
said that Trump’s trade deals
are not about helping Ameri-
can workers but are actually
about helping big companies.
Whatshesaid:
“Anyone who thinks that
these trade deals are mostly
about tariffs just doesn’t un-
derstand what’s going on.
Look at the NAFTA 2.0.
What’s the central feature?
It’s to help pharmaceutical
companies get longer periods
of exclusivity.”

Thisismostlytrue.While
the drug provisions are not
the core element of the Unit-
ed States-Mexico-Canada-
Agreement (NAFTA 2.0), it is
a controversial provision that
continues to hold up ratifica-
tion of the trade pact. As The
Times reported in March, the
agreement gives biologic
drugmakers 10 years of pro-
tections against other prod-
ucts that would rely on the
data they used to win approv-
al.
That 10-year provision
would raise the timeline in
Canada, where the industry
currently has eight years of
protection, and in Mexico,
where it technically has none.
It would not change current
policy in the United States,
where the standard is already
12 years.

CLIMATECHANGE

The timelines of the prob-
lem are more complex than
two candidates described.
Whatwassaid:
BetoO’Rourke: “I listen to
scientists on this, and they
are very clear. We don’t have
more than 10 years to get this
right.”

MayorPeteButtigieg:
“Science tells us we have 12
years before we reach the ho-
rizon of catastrophe when it
comestoourclimate.”

Bothstatementsaremis-
leading.BothO’Rourke,afor-
mer member of Congress from
Texas, and Buttigieg are refer-
ring to a recent Intergovern-
mental Panel on Climate
Change report that finds coun-
tries have about a dozen years
to keep the rise in global aver-
age temperatures to 1.5 de-
grees Celsius above pre-indus-
trial levels.
At that point the planet will
face severe effects including
worsened droughts, floods, and
heat waves. And since most
scenarios for curbing warming
require halving worldwide emis-
sions by 2030, that means
countries must take serious ac-
tion now. But to claim that
there are 12 or just 10 years
until the point of no return goes
beyond what the panel itself
says.

Compiled by reporters of The New York
Times.

cessful Democratic nominees of
the past like Michael Dukakis
and George McGovern, and
criticized them for promising
“free everything.” Montana
Governor Steve Bullock who
touted himself as the only can-
didate on the stage who won
election in a Trump-voting
state, said Medicare for All “rips
away quality health care from
individuals.”
Even Marianne Williamson,
a self-help guru who attracted
attention for telling Trump she
would “harness” love for “politi-
cal purposes” in the first de-
bates in Miami last month, said
she had “concerns” that em-
bracing Medicare for All “will
make it harder to win.”
The attacks — largely from
candidates at risk of being elim-
inated from the next debate in
September due to low polling
numbers — put Warren and
Sanders on the defensive for the
first half of the night. But both
progressives also seized on the
chance to make the case that
big ideas are needed in order to
motivate Democrats to win in
2020, and pushed back on the
moderates on stage for adopt-
ing policy stances out of fear.
“I get a little bit tired of
Democrats afraid of big ideas,”
Sanders said, adding that Re-
publicans had delivered on big
promises of their own, like the
2017 tax cuts. He called for
Democrats to mount a more ag-
gressive response to climate
change. “So please don’t tell me
that we cannot take on the fos-
sil fuel industry.”
Warren, in particular, found
an opening to offer a concise re-
sponse to the lingering ques-
tions around her electability
and the viability of her progres-
sive policies.
“I took on Wall Street and
CEOs and their lobbyists and
their lawyers and I beat them. I
took on a popular Republican
senator and I beat him,” Warren
said, referring to her defeat of
Scott Brown in 2012.
“We can’t choose a candi-
date we don’t believe in just be-
cause we’re too scared to do
anything else,” she said, before
turning to Delaney and landing
the zinger of the night.
“I don’t know why anybody
goes to the trouble of running
for president of the United
States just to talk about what


uDEBATE
Continued from Page A


we can’t do and shouldn’t fight
for,” Warren said to loud ap-
plause.
Even the candidates not un-
der fire from the moderates
urged the party not to be too
concerned with how policy
ideas will be perceived.
Mayor Pete Buttigieg of
South Bend, Ind., who has tak-
en a more cautious position on
Medicare for All than Sanders
or Warren, also asked his fellow
candidates not to focus on Re-
publican critiques. “It is time to
stop worrying about what the
Republicans will say,” Buttigieg
said. “If we embrace a conserva-
tive agenda you know what
they’re going to do? They’re go-
ing to say we’re a bunch of crazy
socialists.”
At times, Warren and Sand-
ers appeared to tag team while
defending themselves from cri-
tiques from others on stage that
their plans are unrealistic or
will be unpopular, in a show of
unity. Warren interjected her-
self into a moderator-instigated
fight between Delaney and
Sanders over Medicare for All,
coming to Sanders’ defense as
Delaney pointed out that Dem-
ocrats would be taking away
private insurance from some
Americans who prefer it.
“We should stop using Re-
publican talking points in order
to talk to each other about how
to best provide health care,”
Warren said.
Sanders also got testy with
Delaney at times, saying that
just because the former con-
gressman used to “make mon-
ey” from health care in his past
as a businessman doesn’t mean

the current system works.
“These insurance companies do
not have a God-given right to
make $23 billion in profits,”
Warren said.
The moderators also pushed
Warren and Sanders to confirm
that taxes would go up on the
middle class in order to pay for
Medicare for All. Both conced-
ed that, but stressed that lower
premiums and deductibles
would mean middle-class
Americans would have more
money in their pockets overall.
The barrage from the mod-
erates pulled Warren away
from some of her signature is-
sues for the first half of the de-
bate. She instead was dragged
into debates about Medicare for
All, immigration, and the
Green New Deal, and occasion-
ally appeared to fade into the
background as the moderate
candidates sparred with Sand-
ers.
But later in the night, War-
ren reacted with glee when the
moderator pointed out that
Delaney — a multimillionaire —
would likely face her proposed
tax on assets that would fund
much of her policy agenda if
she were elected, and she was
able to describe her overhaul of
the nation’s trade deals in de-
tail.
Warren also defended her
position that border crossing
should be decriminalized in a
testy exchange with Bullock,
who said her support for de-
criminalizing some immigra-
tion violations would encour-
age more migrants to come to
the United States.
“You are playing into Don-

ald Trump’s hands,” said Bull-
ock. “A sane immigration sys-
tem needs a sane leader and we
can do that without decriminal-
izing immigration.”
Warren shot back that the
criminal statute is what em-
powers Trump to separate chil-
dren from their parents at their
border.
“These debates are detached
from people’s lives,” Bullock re-
torted.
Buttigieg argued that the de-
bate should be about immigra-
tion reform more broadly, not
decriminalizing border cross-
ing.
“Americans want compre-
hensive immigration reform.
And frankly, we’ve been talking
about the same framework for
my entire adult lifetime,” said
Buttigieg, subtly contrasting his
age — 37 — with that of the sep-
tuagenarians Sanders and War-
ren standing next to him.
By random chance, the 10
candidates on stage Tuesday
night were all white, but they
spoke forcefully about race in
America in a portion of the de-
bate that was far more unified
than the fights over health care
and immigration. Warren, Butt-
igieg, and others pointed to the
specific plans they have re-
leased to try to ameliorate ra-
cial inequality.
“We need to call out white
supremacy for what it is — do-
mestic terrorism,” Warren said.
Senator Amy Klobuchar of
Minnesota said that many of
Trump’s voters were not racist.
“They wanted a shake in the
American economy, so I would
appeal to them,” she said, be-
fore adding that now, “I don’t
think anyone can justify what
Trump is doing.”
And it was Williamson who
drew a direct connection be-
tween Democrats’ willingness
to meaningfully address racism
and the party’s chances of beat-
ing Trump. She mentioned
Flint, Mich., the majority-black
city northwest of Detroit where
a water crisis has dragged on
for years.
“We need to say it like it is —
it’s bigger than Flint. It’s all
over this country,” she said.

Jess Bidgood of the Globe staff
contributed to this report. Liz
Goodwin can be reached at
[email protected].
Follow her on Twitter
@lizcgoodwin.

CARLOS OSORIO/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Ten Democratic candidates gathered at the Fox Theatre in Detroit for the party’s third presidential debate.


Democrats battle over party’s direction


PAUL SANCYA/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren defended
each other throughout the debate.

FACTCHECK

Free download pdf