The Wall Street Journal - 02.08.2019

(Romina) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. ** Friday, August 2, 2019 |A


majority whip in the Senate.
Sen. James Lankford (R.,
Okla.) said he opposed the
deal because it didn’t include
any effort to reduce the U.S.
debt burden.
“I really think that every
time we get to a debt-ceiling
conversation we should also
be having a conversation
about debt. And we didn’t this
time. We skipped it,” he said.
Mr. Trump tweeted Thurs-
day, calling on Republicans to
vote for the agreement.
“Budget Deal is phenomenal
for our Great Military, our
Vets, and Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!
Two year deal gets us past the
Election. Go for it Republicans,
there is always plenty of time
to CUT!” he wrote.
Mr. Mnuchin had warned
that the U.S. could exceed its
borrowing limit before law-
makers return from August re-
cess in early September, accel-
erating the negotiations with
Mrs. Pelosi to reach a deal be-
fore the end of last week. The

government could begin to
miss payments on its obliga-
tions without the ability to
borrow and trigger a potential
default.
The House left Washington
for its recess on Friday.
Lawmakers paired raising
the borrowing limit with set-
ting new overall spending lev-
els to try to ease passage of
the debt-ceiling suspension.
Without a new agreement
on raising spending levels by
Oct. 1, automatic spending
cuts—a requirement known as
sequestration that was put in
place in 2011—would have cut
roughly 10% of discretionary
spending early next year.
The two-year spending deal
ends the threat of sequestra-
tion after fiscal year 2021, a
victory for Democrats who
have sought to increase spend-
ing on domestic programs.
—Catherine Lucey
contributed to this article.

WASHINGTON—A two-year
agreement to raise federal
spending and at the same time
lift the government’s borrow-
ing limit will go to the presi-
dent’s desk after it passed the
Senate with more Democrats
voting for it than Republicans.
The bill, which provides for
more than $2.7 trillion in dis-
cretionary spending over the
next two years, was the result
of weeks of negotiations be-
tween Treasury Secretary Ste-
ven Mnuchin and House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Ca-
lif.).
It suspends the debt ceiling
until the end of July 2021 and
sets spending levels roughly
$320 billion above limits set in
a 2011 law.
While President Trump and
Republican leadership have
celebrated the increases in
military spending the deal
calls for, conservatives in the
House and Senate have lam-
basted what they say are un-
sustainable increases in fed-
eral deficits.
Under the Trump adminis-
tration, the annual federal def-
icit is set to reach $1 trillion.
“I am confident it is not ex-
actly the legislation that ei-
ther side of the aisle would
have written if one party held
the White House, the House,
and had 60 votes in the Sen-
ate,” Senate Majority Leader
Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said
on the chamber’s floor on
Wednesday. “That’s divided
government. But I am equally
confident that this is a deal
that every one of my col-
leagues should support.”
The bill passed the Demo-
cratic-controlled House last
week, when roughly two-
thirds of House Republicans
opposed the legislation. Mr.
Trump and Vice President
Mike Pence have been calling
skeptical Republican senators
to urge them to support the
deal since it was agreed to, ac-
cording to a person familiar
with the talks. Mr. Trump also
lobbied uncertain House Re-
publicans last week and
tweeted his backing for it.
The legislation ultimately
cleared the Senate with 67
votes. Twenty-eight Senators
voted against it, with 23 Re-
publicans joining five Demo-
crats to oppose the deal. Re-
publicans control the chamber
with a 53-seat majority.
“Any spending vote, debt
limit vote, is not easy. I’ve
been around here a long time,
they’re all hard votes,” said
Sen. John Thune (R., S.D.), the

BYANDREWDUEHREN

Spending


Bill Clears


The Senate


ANDREW HARRER/BLOOMBERG NEWS

Senate Majority
Leader Mitch
McConnell
supported the deal.

They run the databases that
hold customer credit scores
and social-security numbers.
They analyze risk for banks’
traders and process payments.
Cloud computing has made
possible services that custom-
ers now take for granted, like
mobile access to their bank ac-
counts and split-second deci-
sions on their efforts to buy
and sell securities.
Amazon is the biggest
player, controlling nearly half
of the public cloud market in
2018, according to Gartner.
Amazon Web Services came
out of a 2003 brainstorming
session about ways to use the
company’s extra data centers.
It now contributes three-quar-
ters of the company’s overall
profits, helping to support its
low-margin retail business.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.,
Nasdaq Inc. and payments

company Stripe Inc. all use
Amazon. A competing cloud
service from Microsoft Corp.
counts JPMorgan Chase & Co.
and TD Bank among its clients.
Google, a smaller player, is
also courting banks.
Most big banks use all three
to some extent. Some, like
Capital One, have closed their
proprietary data centers and
moved much of their digital
footprint to the cloud, which
makes Amazon and its com-
petitors crucial to day-to-day
banking.
But Washington hasn’t fig-
ured out yet how to regulate
them. Established bank ven-
dors such as FiServ Inc. have
been subject to inquiries from
financial regulators for years
because they provide the core
software that runs banks’ de-
posit and loan platforms.
Regulators have only lim-

Esper to Review
Cloud Contract

WASHINGTON—Defense
Secretary Mark Esper will re-
view a massive cloud-comput-
ing contract, creating a new po-
tential obstacle for the lucrative
deal that had been questioned
by President Trump.
The contract-award process
for the Joint Enterprise Defense
Infrastructure program, known
as JEDI, had been marred by
conflict-of-interest allegations.
The Pentagon previously identi-
fied Amazon Inc.’s AWS unit
and Microsoft Corp.’s Azure di-
vision as finalists and said it
expected to award the contract
by the end of August.
“No decision will be made
on the program until he has

completed his examination,” a
Pentagon spokeswoman said.
The contract, expected to be
valued at up to $10 billion, had
come under fire over allegations
of conflict of interest involving
a former Pentagon employee
who worked on the contract
and for Amazon. Oracle Corp. in
July lost a legal bid to force a
deeper review of the potential
conflicts.
Some companies were con-
cerned that a single award
would give the winner an unfair
advantage in follow-on work.
The Pentagon has said it
planned to award future cloud
deals to multiple contractors.
President Trump said on
July 18 he had heard “tremen-
dous complaints” about the
process for awarding the JEDI
contract and vowed to ask his
administration “to look at it

very closely.” He cited com-
plaints by Microsoft, Oracle, and
International Business Machines
Corp. Google withdrew last
year, citing its own ethics policy
regarding military work.
Oracle, Microsoft and Ama-
zon declined to comment. IBM
pointed to previous comments
about the contract’s structure.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R.,
Iowa) said earlier this summer
that emails showing meetings
between Amazon executives
and high-level Pentagon offi-
cials bolstered his belief that
the bidding process should be
restarted. The House Appropria-
tions Committee said in a re-
cent legislative report that it
was concerned with the Penta-
gon’s approach to JEDI.
Nevertheless, the Pentagon
appeared ready to forge ahead.
On July 28, it issued a state-

ment touting a judge’s ruling in
the Oracle case, saying in part:
“The court’s decision unequivo-
cally concludes that JEDI is a
full and open competition and,
despite uninformed speculation
to the contrary, its integrity re-
mains intact.”
The Pentagon has more
than 500 clouds, and JEDI
would serve as an umbrella
system to rationalize that num-
ber and provide the military
with access to services that
keep up with the pace of tech-
nology in civilian markets.
The initial two-year contract
includes three option periods
extending the potential award
over a decade, and the Penta-
gon also wants upgrades at
commercial prices, but with
tough built-in cybersecurity pro-
tections.
—Ryan Tracy

A U.S. Indian Health Ser-
vice manager who subordi-
nates said gave an order not
to report an allegation of
child sexual abuse at an
agency-run substance-abuse
treatment center has re-
signed, employees said the fa-
cility’s CEO announced in a
meeting Thursday.
The manager, Tracey Grant,
had been on leave since June
14, according to an internal
email reviewed by The Wall
Street Journal. A week ear-
lier, an investigation by the
Journal detailed Ms. Grant’s
decisions after an incident at
the IHS’s Unity Healing Cen-
ter in Cherokee, N.C.
In September 2016, suspi-
cions arose about the rela-
tionship between a 16-year-
old female patient and an IHS
employee, a 47-year-old main-
tenance man, after video sur-
veillance showed them enter-
ing a private bathroom,
according to staff members
and documents. Hours after

the girl was questioned about
her interactions with the
man, she attempted to hang
herself, records show.
Several workers said they
suspected sexual misconduct
by the maintenance man, but
that Ms. Grant instructed
them not to report it, despite
legal requirements they do so.
The girl’s counselor, former
IHS therapist Tawna Harri-
son, said Ms. Grant “told me,
‘No, I will handle this. Do not
contact anybody,’ ” the Jour-
nal reported in its June 7 ar-
ticle.
Ms. Grant confirmed in a
brief conversation Thursday
that she had resigned for
“personal reasons.” She de-
clined to comment further on
the events at Unity.
She is also the subject of
an investigation by the North
Carolina Psychology Board for
her role in the 2016 incident,
records show.
The IHS said Ms. Grant’s
resignation was effective July


  1. “Sexual assault and abuse
    will not be tolerated at the


Unity Healing Center or else-
where in the IHS,” a spokes-
man said in a statement. He
said the agency was seeking a
contractor to do a review of
sex-abuse reporting practices
at Unity.
The IHS has been under
scrutiny for its handling of
child sex-abuse allegations
against its staff members fol-
lowing a report by the Jour-
nal and the PBS series Front-
line that detailed the agency’s
mishandling of a pedophile
pediatrician.
In that case, managers in
Montana and South Dakota
missed or ignored warning
signs, tried to silence whistle-
blowers and allowed the doc-
tor, Stanley Patrick Weber, to
continue treating children de-
spite the suspicions of col-
leagues up and down the
chain of command.
Mr. Weber was convicted in
Montana last year on charges
of sexual abuse and is appeal-
ing the verdict. He faces an-
other trial on related charges
in South Dakota next month

and has pleaded guilty to
charges there.
After the Journal and
Frontline reported on that epi-
sode, the IHS overhauled its
policies for handling sexual-
abuse case at its facilities. It
implemented nationwide train-
ing on how to handle such al-
legations last month.
Federal law already re-
quires health-care workers,
administrators and others to
report suspicions of sexual
abuse of children under 18 to
law-enforcement authorities.
But some agency employees
have said in interviews they
were instead directed to bring
such concerns to managers.
The maintenance man in-
volved in the 2016 incident,
Nathaniel Crowe, didn’t re-
spond to requests for com-
ment Thursday. In a June
Facebook post, he said he had
been fully cleared and that al-
legations about him were “a
total misconception.”
A federal probe into the
matter continues, said people
familiar with the matter.

BYCHRISTOPHERWEAVER

Official Out Over Abuse Reporting


Some workers at a treatment center run by the U.S. Indian Health Service have said they were deterred from reporting sexual abuse.

CHARLES MOSTOLLER FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


warily at the Amazon offices.
Chaperoned by an Amazon em-
ployee, they were allowed to
review certain documents on
Amazon laptops, but not al-
lowed to take anything with
them, some of the people said.
The examination points to a
culture clash between govern-
ment and big tech, which has
been far less regulated than
the financial sector. Antitrust
investigations are under way
into whether Amazon, Face-
book Inc. and other tech com-
panies have used their size
and influence to stifle compe-
tition.
The examination, headed up
by the Federal Reserve’s Rich-
mond branch, also brings to
the fore the question of where
banks end and where the ven-
dors that power them begin.
The examiners in Virginia
were focused on Amazon’s re-
siliency and backup systems,
some of the people said, de-
scribing the visit as the first of
what is expected to be ongoing
oversight of the tech giant.
Technology companies such
as Amazon are now a crucial
player in the U.S. banking sys-
tem, whether they want to be
or not.

ContinuedfromPageOne

ited power over nonbanks, and
typically rely on banks to vet
their own vendors. A U.S.
Treasury report last year
found that bank regulations
hadn’t “sufficiently modern-
ized to accommodate cloud
and other innovative technolo-
gies.”
Part of that modernization
will require reckoning with a
cultural chasm between Silicon
Valley’s entrepreneurs and
Washington officials: After the
meeting in Virginia, the Feds
sought more documents and
information from Amazon,
people familiar with the mat-
ter said.
The company balked, de-
manding to first see details
about how its data would be
stored and used, and who
would have access and for how
long, some of the people said.
Tech giants have fought
new oversight. When the gov-
ernment weighed new cyberse-
curity standards in 2017, Ama-
zon lobbied against them.
Cloud companies, it argued,
simply sell a system and turn
over the job of running and se-
curing it to their clients.
“Imposing additional cyber-
security requirements...could
unnecessarily lead to redun-
dancy and increases in compli-
ance costs, while potentially
leaving systemically important
financial institutions less se-
cure,” Amazon wrote to regu-
lators in 2017. The proposal
was eventually dropped.
—Emily Glazer
and Telis Demos
contributed to this article.

Fed Team


Checked


Amazon


Amazon controlled nearly half of the public cloud market in 2018,
according to Gartner.

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ/REUTERS

U.S. NEWS


Meet SimpliSafe.There are no contracts.
No hidden fees. And no nonsense.
All at prices that are fair and honest.
It’s home security. Done right.

Right now, get free shipping
atSimpliSafe.com/wall

sr.


sr.


srngr.

Free download pdf