The Guardian - 03.08.2019

(Nandana) #1

Section:GDN 1J PaGe:2 Edition Date:190803 Edition:01 Zone: Sent at 2/8/2019 17:43 cYanmaGentaYellowblac



  • The Guardian Sat urday 3 Aug ust 2019


2


policymakers decades to adapt (and has led
to a welcome fall in teenage pregnancies
in the UK to boot). Yet falling fertility rates
are becoming a dangerously hot political potato, as
legitimate questions about how a shrinking pool of
younger workers can support an expanding cloud of
older ones start to become dangerously entangled with
white supremacist hysteria about the supposed failure
of Christian communities to breed fast enough, or with
the perennial rightwing anxiety about what women
might seek to do with their bodies if they had complete
freedom to choose. For some men, it seems the only
thing scarier than the prospect of a broody woman
trying to trap them into pregnancy is the idea of one
wilfully refusing to get into all that.
For years, conventional wisdom has been that
policymakers could bump up the birthrate by investing
in cheap childcare and fl exible working, so that women
didn’t face such agonising choices between work and
motherhood. (For that is what “leaving it too late”
so often boils down to in practice; not couples clean
forgetting to have a baby, but women seeing what
happens to other mothers in the offi ce and not daring
to risk a pregnancy until they feel more professionally
established, by which time it’s often harder to get
pregnant.) But now birthrates are tapering off even in
Sweden, with its world-beating parental leave , heavily
subsidised nurseries and an egalitarian culture that
fi rmly encourage s men to share the load with their
exhausted partners. Neighbouring Norway’s prime
minister, too, recently declared that the country “needs
more children”, amid warnings that its welfare state
model would otherwise be in jeopardy. Either the world
of work still hasn’t evolved far and fast enough to meet
millennial parents’ expectations, or something more
fundamental is shifting.

N


ext week Channel 4 screens the
fi ctional drama I Am Hannah, part
of a series exploring female lives,
which centres on a 30-something
lawyer being nagged by all and
sundry to get on with having
children before it’s too late. So far,
so wearily familiar, but what makes
this one stand out from all the other stories set in an egg-
freezing clinic is its central character’s struggle to work
out how far she desperately wants to be a mother, and
how far it’s simply what everyone else wants for her.
As Gemma Chan , the actress who both plays Hannah
and contributed to the storyline, put it in a recent
interview: “I feel like we have more freedom these
days, but we don’t necessarily feel as free as we should
to make diff erent choices for ourselves.” And that’s
where the policy debate starts scratching at the surface
of dark feelings many parents can’t admit even to
themselves: not regret, exactly, so much as suppressed
resentment about the inevitable sacrifi ces demanded by
children and the occasional guilty daydream about what
otherwise might have been.
The more motherhood comes to be seen as a choice,
rather than an unavoidable fact of female existence or
some kind of great romantic destiny, the greater the
anxiety both about making the wrong choice and about
living with the ghost of the life not chosen. Trying to
counter all that by nagging young women to knuckle
down to it in order to avoid a future global pensions
defi cit is destined for the failure such emotionally tin-
eared tactics deserve.
Better, perhaps, to treat a shrinking population less
like an annoying economic aberration to be corrected,
and more like a riddle of human happiness. Where people
are struggling to have the family lives they want, then of
course government’s role is to step in: to create the stable
jobs, aff ordable homes and family-friendly working
conditions that make it possible. But if millennials are
simply thinking harder than previous generations did
before having children – or if some people who would in
generations past have felt railroaded into an unwanted
family life are now fi nding the courage to remain
childfree – well, that’s very diff erent. Sometimes good
governance, much like good parenting, is a question of
knowing when it’s really none of your business.

It is a mark of the recent reversals of expectation among
Britain’s political parties that anything other than a
Liberal Democrat victory in the Brecon and Radnorshire
byelection would have been a major surprise. It would
also have been a devastating blow to the Liberal
Democrat leader, Jo Swinson, who took over less than
three weeks ago and promptly announced that she was
not merely now the party leader but “a candidate to be
prime minister ”. That ambitious claim would have been
dead in the water without Jane Dodds’ win on Thursday.
This widely anticipated result should do nothing
to lessen the Lib Dem s’ achievement. Brecon and
Radnorshire was a target seat; the Lib Dems have now
won seven of the last 10 parliamentary contests there,
as well as holding the Welsh assembly seat with the
same boundaries. But Chris Davies had won the seat
by a thumping 8,000 majority for the Conservatives
as recently as 2017, which was otherwise generally a
bad election for the Tories in Wales. Moreover, the area
voted to leave the EU and the Lib Dems are an explicitly
remain party. The Tories had also just chosen a new and
stridently pro-leave leader who was enjoying a modest
boost in the polls. So it was no pushover for Ms Dodds
to take the seat with a 1,425 majority over Mr Davies.
However, the Lib Dems enjoyed two unusual
advantages in this contest. The fi rst was the candidacy
of Mr Davies. In March the now former MP pleaded guilty
to two counts of forging his parliamentary expenses.
In June, he was recalled as an MP by a petition. His local
party nevertheless reselected him for this contest.
Though he was well known, he was clearly also damaged
goods. It will therefore be easy for the Conservatives
to blame him for their defeat rather than looking more
widely, including at Boris Johnson, for the explanation.
The second advantage was the electoral pact with
Plaid Cymru and the Greens , giving the Lib Dems

To every thing there is a season; a time to bowl, a time
to bat, a time to sweep, a time to block, a time to dribble,
a time to pass, a time to shoot, a time to knock it over
to the big lad in the middle and hope for the best. Or
at least that used to be the case, until the cricket and
football seasons blended into one and we reached the
current sorry situation where the fi rst Ashes Test and
the football season started in the same week. Denis
Compton, who in an age when the seasons were happily
compartmentalised played 78 Tests for England and won
the FA Cup with Arsenal, must be spinning in his grave.
The opening salvo in the Ashes battle was fi red
at Edgbaston on Thursday. More bathetically, the
English football season began yesterday evening with a
championship match between Luton and Middlesbrough.
No disrespect to Eric Morecambe’s beloved club, but this
is a joke: who wants to spend a balmy evening in early
August at Kenilworth Road? There is a full programme of
Football League fi xtures today, and tomorrow sees the
fi rst showpiece match of the season when Manchester
City and Liverpool play for the Community Shield.
Why? Who decrees that the football season has to start
so ridiculously early, just two months after the end of
the previous one? Would football fans really mind if it

a clear run at the seat as the explicitly anti-Brexit,
pro-remain party. Both the Lib Dem victory and its
relative narrowness seem to vindicate that approach,
and there will sensibly be similar pressures now in
other elections. However, the success of the pact
should not be overstated. The Greens did not stand
in Brecon and Radnorshire in 2017, and Plaid Cymru
took only just over a thousand votes. In addition, the
Lib Dems did not highlight Brexit in the campaign,
preferring to run on local issues. Some caution is thus
needed before claiming the result as a full-throated
remain triumph. But the Lib Dem recovery continues,
and a prospective byelection in Nick Clegg’s old seat
of Sheffi eld Hallam may give it further momentum.
It is clear, however, that many Labour voters also
helped to send Ms Dodds to Westminster. It bears
repeating that until 1979 this was a Labour seat. In the
1985 byelection, Labour fi nished a very close second.
Even in 2015 and 2017, Labour’s vote share was still
in the mid-teens. But on Thursday, Labour was down
12 points to 5.3%. The Lib Dem vote, by contrast,
rose by 14. Tactical voting by Labour supporters in
Tory–Lib Dem seats is always a factor, but this was
tactical voting by core Labour voters. The message
for both the leave-supporting Jeremy Corbyn and for
remain-supporting Welsh Labour is very stark.
Perversely, the Conservatives are likely to take
some comfort from this byelection. Mr Davies was
not blown away. Their vote, though down by nine
points, held up far better than when the Liberals won
the 1985 byelection. Most Tory defectors this time
seem to have gone to the Brexit party, but with only
11% support, this byelection was no triumph for the
Faragistes and, in contrast to the European elections,
the bulk of the leave vote stayed with the Tories.
Ultimately, though, the Tories have lost votes,
lost another seat, their Commons majority is even
more razor-thin, and any Johnson bounce – which is
unlikely to get bigger – has been modest. The fanciful
idea that the new prime minister is an election winner
remains dubious and unproved. Above all, there is
now one more vote at Westminster against no-deal. If
there is a big message from Brecon and Radnorshire,
it is not that the country embraces his no-deal
lunacy – which it does not – but that Brexit can still be
softened, and perhaps even stopped.

started in early September as the schools went back
and temperatures started to drop? And wouldn’t the
players benefi t from a shorter season, rather than the
current bloated, virtually year-round one?
The end of August used to mark the change of the
sporting seasons, with cricket giving way to football
and an overlap of at most a couple of weeks. Now, the
overlap is almost two months, with fi rst-class cricket


  • thanks to a combination of global heating and the
    proliferation of identikit midsummer Twenty20
    matches – carrying on until 26 September. The fi nal
    Test at the Oval, which always used to be played at
    August bank holiday, is not scheduled to end until
    16 September – fi ve Ashes Tests crammed into less
    than seven weeks at the tailend of the summer.
    The main reason for this odd scheduling is that the
    Cricket World Cup took up most of June and July, but
    surely that long-drawn-out event could have been a
    little shorter. The fi rst, unforgettable tournament in
    1975 was done and dusted in a fortnight.
    This trend towards gargantuanism, fuelled
    by television’s pursuit of product and sports
    administrators’ desire for dosh, must be resisted as
    much as possible. Ease the sporting bombardment
    and let spectators and players enjoy both sports,
    ideally in their traditional seasons. Who knows,
    perhaps then we will see a successor to CB Fry , who
    at the turn of the 20th century played both cricket
    and football for England and still had time to equal
    the world long jump record. He could also leap from
    a standing start on to a mantelpiece , which is not a
    feat that Joe Root or Harry Kane would have time to
    perfect in this over-specialised, over-stuff ed sporting
    age of ours.





 Continued from front

Give spectators and players


a break: these unceasing


seasons are just not cricket


Sport


Brecon and Radnorshire byelection


This Lib Dem win can help


to stop the no-deal lunacy


of the Conservatives


Founded 1821 Independently owned by the Scott Trust No 53 ,790


‘Comment is free... but facts are sacred’ CP Scott


Falling fertility rates are not


the business of government


Gaby Hinsliff


РЕЛИЗ ПОДГОТОВИЛА ГРУППА "What's News" VK.COM/WSNWS

Free download pdf