News Focus
30 WDDTY | ISSUE 01 | AUG/SEP 2019 FACEBOOK.COM/WDDTYAUNZ5G: Is it safe?
Nobody seems
to know
The new superfast 5G cell phone network starts rolling out
around the world in 2020—and yet nobody is testing to
discover if it’s a threat to our healthT
he new 5G (fifth-generation) cell
phone network will start to roll out
next year. With speeds that could
be as much as 100 times faster than
the current 4G network, 5G will have
the capacity to deliver the ‘Internet of
Things’—so your fridge can notify you
(or Amazon) when you’re low on milk,
for instance. It will be a major fillip for
new services, and, of course, for the cell
phone manufacturers who are preparing
their new compatible handsets. Even
President Trump has gotten in on the
act, tweeting he “wants 5G, and even 6G,
technology in the United States as soon
as possible.”
Industry observers say that the
technological leap 5G will deliver is akin
to the shift from typewriters to personal
computers—but some scientists are
less enthusiastic and see it as one vast
human health experiment. With no
safe levels agreed on, they fear that the
higher radiofrequency radiation of the
5G network could pose a major health
risk, especially to young children and
pregnant women.
Even with earlier, and less powerful,
networks, children were absorbing up to
10 times more radiation from cell phones
than adults—and that’s at least two times
above safe limits, the US Environmental
Health Trust said in 2011.
Small children absorb twice as much
radiation to their heads, three timesmore in their eyes and the hippocampus
and hypothalamus regions of the brain,
and 10 times more radiation to the bone
marrow.^1 And with around 70 percent of
children age 10 and younger using a cell
phone, and two-thirds of them having a
smartphone, according to a 2014 Nielsen
survey, this is a major health concern.
A group of 230 scientists from 40
countries has issued the 5G Appeal,
asking the European Union (EU) for a
moratorium on the roll-out of the 5G
network throughout its 27 member
states until the health hazards of all
cellular technology and Wi-Fi networks
are independently assessed.^2 One of
the signatories, Professor Martin L.
Pall, a biochemist at Washington State
University, has described the roll-out of
the 5G network as “the stupidest idea in
the history of the world.”
Similar concerns have been raised in
the US Senate. In a hearing about the new
network last December, industry officials
admitted there hadn’t been any health
and safety studies on 5G technology. In
response, Senator Richard Blumenthal
(D-CT) criticized the US Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)
and Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) for failing to safeguard the
American public. As he said at the end of
the hearing: “So there really is no research
ongoing. We’re kind of flying blind here
as far as health and safety is concerned.”Rats first
Although the biological effects of
electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been
known since 1932, few independent
studies have properly researched their
impact on human health, and many
that have been published have only
tested laboratory rats and mice. Instead,
government agencies have relied on
studies paid for by the mobile phone
industry, which, perhaps not surprisingly,
have consistently failed to see any hazards.
One investigation by the National
Toxicology Program, a division of the
US Department of Health and Human
Services, found some risk of cancer with
the earlier 2G and 3G cell phones, certainly
as far as male rats were concerned. The $25
million research project exposed the rats to
10-minute bursts of cell phone radiation
for two years.
Meanwhile, regulators and agencies
have been pocketing vast sums from the
network providers. The FCC raked in
$703 million from the first release of 5G
licenses—with a further 100 licenses still
to be released at the time of writing—and
the UK’s equivalent agency, Ofcom,
banked £1.3 billion from the auction of
the new network.
Although the cell phone industry may
have given itself a clean bill of health, in
2011 the World Health Organization
designated radiofrequency radiation a
group 2B carcinogen, which means it
may be cancer-causing in humans, and
scientists fear the new 5G technology
could have even more widespread health
consequences.Build more towers
The 5G network is ultra-high frequency
(UHF) and ultra-high intensity—the
existing 4G network operates at up to 5
GHz (gigahertz), but 5G is between 24
and 90 GHz on the EMF spectrum—and
the health dangers increase with higher
frequencies, at least in theory.
Although it is more powerful, 5G
travels over shorter distances. Its shorter
millimeter waves (MMVs) mean that
millions more cell towers will need to be
installed across the US and every other
country that’s introducing 5G. A new
5G mini-tower—they stand at around
four feet tall—will serve just two to eight
houses, it’s estimated.
And it’s no good campaigning if a
mast ends up outside your front door.