and Civil Service offices, all before its stint as the
Museum of Mankind. Since 1997, parts of the building
have hosted temporary exhibitions for the RA, and
galleries such as Haunch of Venison and Pace. But in all
the principal rooms the years had left their mark –
partition walls, Formica desks, false ceilings and grubby
greige paint. There were modifications and mezzanines.
An institutional memory lingered. Much of the
circulation around the building had happened through
fire doors and up cramped service wells, brightly
lit by bare 100W bulbs, like a Martin Parr Polaroid.
This was what the RA acquired in 2001. In theory,
it had added a large listed Italianate building 30m
to the rear of the Royal Academy Schools complex,
with which it could connect to expand its footprint.
In practice, it was much less straightforward.
‘We wanted to bring the grandeur back,’ says RA
president Christopher Le Brun. ‘But as the years
passed without real progress, the discussions intensified
with people wanting to knock it down and keep only
the façade.’ Le Brun, a Royal Academician since 1996,
actually started working on the project before the RA
had raised the funds to buy it. The original master plan,
by Michael Hopkins, had involved an ambitious scheme
to glaze over the space between the two buildings, British
Museum-style. The costs exploded, and the plans were
shelved. A second, more modest, plan by Sandy Wilson
was then adopted. But the RA Schools, located between
6 Burlington Gardens and the RA’s main site at
Burlington House, wouldn’t let a link go through their
space, and there was nowhere else on site to relocate a
50 or so-strong student body. ‘So Sandy’s plan made the
link go all the way around the outside,’ explains Le Brun.
‘This wasn’t popular. I remember a meeting where
we showed it to all the architects in the RA. As of one
person they said no; they hated it. I think Piers Gough
even used a rude word. They said it’s obvious, you have
to go straight through the middle to connect the spaces.’
The project stalled again; the second master plan
lapsed on Wilson’s death in 2007. It seemed for a while
that a grand project might never happen – until a third
competition was held. ‘David Chipperfield won it, with
a scheme that did indeed go through the middle of the
site, and everything changed,’ says Le Brun. ‘I went to
talk to the schools with David’s project architect, and
they saw the quality of his scheme and quickly agreed
to it. That made all the difference. And as soon as we
could go through the middle of the site, all of David’s
ideas – a light touch, being straightforward, respecting
the integrity of the original building: they all worked.
We could start to see it really was a beautiful building
underneath. He had just done the Neues Museum.
He was clearly ideal. Not only was he an Academician,
he was able to treat a historic building with tact and
sympathy but also fairly robustly, not over-respectfully.’
Now, finally, this plan is coming to life, just in time
to mark the RA’s 250th anniversary. Like the Neues,
much of the pleasure is in the detailing. Chipperfield’s
favourite space is a former brick vault he reclaimed
from acres of piping, which now serves as an exhibition
space. Lit by pendant lamps designed by the architect,
the grand circulation spaces lead to impressive new
display areas. Tacita Dean will open the space, and then
a major Renzo Piano show will bring architecture
to the new building, something that is envisaged as
an essential part of the new programming. A permanent
architectural studio will host a programme of year-long
interventions, and for the first time there will be
a full event and lecture programme. ‘Having this
amazing lecture room is key,’ says Marlow. ‘There is
so much discussion and debate at the RA. Now we
have the space to programme as much as we want.’
All told, the plan increases the RA’s gallery space by
70 per cent. Chipperfield has also retained the windows
in a new middle gallery that overlooks the centre of the
site, and created a huge gallery in the west, where the
RA will show some of its permanent collection – much
of which is currently in storage – for the first time.
But the absolute key, the proposal which unlocked
the whole site, is the link bridge. Bar the lecture theatre,
it’s the only bit of what Le Brun calls ‘freestanding
Chipperfieldness’, and it’s spectacular. From it you
look out into the hidden courtyard and the schools
at the heart of the RA. And because the collections
galleries are free, they will surely help the RA become
a destination between its hugely influential shows.
‘My feeling about architecture,’ says Chipperfield,
‘is that visitors don’t have to look at everything all the
time. They have to be happy in the ambience of the
place, and only then do they realise someone has put
a lot of time into the detailing of it. Detailing has no
purpose on its own. Design has no purpose on its own.
But I do think that someone can smell or feel when
trouble and care has been taken. That was our experience
of Neues, and that is what we are hoping for here.’ ∂
The new Royal Academy of Arts opens on 19 May,
royalacademy.org.uk; davidchipperfield.com Drawings: © David Chipperfield Architects
Top, early concept drawings
of the RA Schools’ cast
corridor and Burlington
Gardens’ façade
Above, David Chipperfield’s
limited-edition cover, available
to subscribers, features an
architectural drawing of the
bridge linking the two
Royal Academy buildings
056 ∑
Architecture