Linux Format - UK (2019-12)

(Antfer) #1
42 LXF257 December 2019 http://www.linuxformat.com

INTERVIEW Jason Shepherd


use open technology to bring back checks
from strangers. This is partly why open
source matters so much. You know the
movie My Big Fat Greek Wedding with the
guy that sprays Windex on everything?

LXF: Of course, it’s a classic. Windex
cures ills from psoriasis to poison ivy.
JS: Well, I see blockchain as one of the
Windexes of technology. And 5G is
another one. These are important
technologies, but they won’t solve the
world. This will take 3-5 years, but there
are already companies like Helium, who
provide shareable Wi-Fi bandwidth. That’s
the resources part of it. A lot of people just
talk about the data, but it’s really about
data, resources and services.
It’s about selling those to strangers or,
in a more altruistic context, sharing them.
You can’t get there without a combination
of technologies. So what you need is
industry collaboration, open collaboration.
You need root of trust for the silicon level.
All data in a digital sense is all created in
silicon: things or devices or PCs or
whatever. You need trusted zero-touch
provisioning, and by that I mean when I
ship a box somewhere, I don’t know who’s
going to plug it in. I still need it to get the
certificate and the dial tones securely and
safely. You might’ve noticed
that Intel and Arm
announced that they’re
collaborating on this. You
need that industry
collaboration.
Then you need open
frameworks like EdgeX that
are architected to bring
together an ecosystem
around very heterogeneous
components, because that’s
what embedded is. We’re
collaborating in this new
Akraino project – that’s a
telco-centred infrastructure

monetise data resources and services
with complete strangers. You will never,
ever get there with a bunch of lock-in
models, you must have openness.
In consumer, trust is built, generally,
with a number of entities that you get
value from. I know my UPS guy by name.
Amazon’s great. Four years ago I told my
team “Hey, Amazon’s gonna win the first
round of consumer – don’t even try”,
because they’ve got the double whammy:
they sell you content and stuff. Google will
do fine, Apple will do fine, and then you’ve
got your Facebooks and such. Sometimes
the trust is violated, especially around
privacy, but generally, in consumer, if you
build trust with someone and you get
value from their services, then your
privacy goes out the window. Period.
In business, or in business-to-business-
to-consumer, or crossing between any
public and private domain, you cannot
have any single owner of the trust – it
doesn’t work. So the current IoT market
has everyone building these platforms
that lock people into their clouds or
whatever, so they can make money off
those people’s data. That’s completely
backwards. Since all data is collected at
the edge, what you need to do is set the
data free the moment it’s created, and

project. EdgeX is at the application layer,
Akraino is more infrastructure-level. So
great things happen when you collaborate
there. Then, yes, you need some Ledger,
and maybe some AI for contents. And
when you combine all this in the right way,
with industry collaboration, no single
ownership of trust, then I can literally
create data in the physical world – and if
I choose to, then I can share it or sell it to
complete strangers. This is scale.
I’ve never met anyone who has said this
can be done the way people are doing
things today. It won’t work, and people say
“Oh, that’s logical”. In the ocean you have
riptides, and people’s natural inclination is
to swim against the current back to shore.
If you try this you’ll get tired and you’ll
drown. In any new emerging market you
get this herd mentality, and just now that’s
all about lock-in models.
What we’re doing as an open
community is we’re swimming sideways,
which is what you’re supposed to do. You
collaborate, you get out of that lock-in,
and you start to open things up. In a
similar water analogy, I would say the
maker movement is why IoT came along.
It used to be with industrial, buildings,
manufacturing, whatever, they’d be
proprietary platforms that would lock you
in and cost you tens of thousands of
dollars a year.
The moment an innovative small
company pops up that threatens your way
of life – and this has been going on for
years – [they] buy ’em up and kill ’em. But
with all of the power from this open
collaboration, and the kickstarters, there’s
not enough money in the world to buy up
all those innovators.
You either change or you die, and this
is the innovators’ dilemma. So we’re all
about floating all the boats for open scale
and collaboration and, in this world, just
make sure your boat is really good and
really fast. You’ve got to innovate and
stay ahead. From Dell Technologies’
standpoint we gave away our code to
seed the project. The Linux Foundation
has to be completely transparent – they
do a great job running transparent, open
projects with governance when needed.

LXF: They do a great job organising these
interviews for me too. There are an awful
lot of distractions, both of the technical
and sugary nature.
JS: We knew that this needs to be open.
I’d say we’re at the ‘AOL’ stage of IoT: it’s
early days. Initially EdgeX is about
interoperability. The easiest way to
describe it to people is it will do for IoT
what Android did for mobile. You have to
abstract that interoperability of the

EDGEX TO LF EDGE


Since this interview, EdgeX Foundry
has become part of LF Edge (https://
lfedge.org), Linux Foundation’s
umbrella organisation which aims
to further the Edge unification and
interoperability about which Jason
spoke so eloquently in this interview.
LF Edge is supported by key
industry players including Arm, AT&T,
Dell EMC, IBM, Intel and Zededa.
Besides EdgeX, other LF Edge-hosted
projects include Akraino (mentioned),
Baetyl (for connecting cloud-native

applications), Fledge (for industrial
edge applications) and Project EVE
(The Edge Virtualization Engine).
EVE connects a type-1 hypervisor
with optimisations and hardening
designed especially for running on
edge and IoT devices. You can read
more about it in a future issue when
the transcription Jonnibot gets round
to typing up the interview he just
enjoyed in Lyon with none other than
Erik Nordmark, cofounder of, and Chief
Architect at, Zededa.

“I make you laugh? I’m
here to amuse you?”

42 LXF257December 2019 4440Decmbr 21930 1


INTERVIEW Jason Shepherd


use open technology to bring back checks
from strangers. This is partly why open
source matters so much. You know the
movie My Big Fat Greek Wedding with the
guy that sprays Windex on everything?

LXF: Of course, it’s a classic. Windex
cures ills from psoriasis to poison ivy.
JS: Well, I see blockchain as one of the
Windexes of technology. And 5G is
another one. These are important
technologies, but they won’t solve the
world. This will take 3-5 years, but there
are already companies like Helium, who
provide shareable Wi-Fi bandwidth. That’s
the resources part of it. A lot of people just
talk about the data, but it’s really about
data, resources and services.
It’s about selling those to strangers or,
in a more altruistic context, sharing them.
You can’t get there without a combination
of technologies. So what you need is
industry collaboration, open collaboration.
You need root of trust for the silicon level.
All data in a digital sense is all created in
silicon: things or devices or PCs or
whatever. You need trusted zero-touch
provisioning, and by that I mean when I
ship a box somewhere, I don’t know who’s
going to plug it in. I still need it to get the
certificate and the dial tones securely and
safely. You might’ve noticed
that Intel and Arm
announced that they’re
collaborating on this. You
need that industry
collaboration.
Then you need open
frameworks like EdgeX that
are architected to bring
together an ecosystem
around very heterogeneous
components, because that’s
what embedded is. We’re
collaborating in this new
Akraino project – that’s a
telco-centred infrastructure

monetise data resources and services
with complete strangers. You will never,
ever get there with a bunch of lock-in
models, you must have openness.
In consumer, trust is built, generally,
with a number of entities that you get
value from. I know my UPS guy by name.
Amazon’s great. Four years ago I told my
team “Hey, Amazon’s gonna win the first
round of consumer – don’t even try”,
because they’ve got the double whammy:
they sell you content and stuff. Google will
do fine, Apple will do fine, and then you’ve
got your Facebooks and such. Sometimes
the trust is violated, especially around
privacy, but generally, in consumer, if you
build trust with someone and you get
value from their services, then your
privacy goes out the window. Period.
In business, or in business-to-business-
to-consumer, or crossing between any
public and private domain, you cannot
have any single owner of the trust – it
doesn’t work. So the current IoT market
has everyone building these platforms
that lock people into their clouds or
whatever, so they can make money off
those people’s data. That’s completely
backwards. Since all data is collected at
the edge, what you need to do is set the
data free the moment it’s created, and


project. EdgeX is at the application layer,
Akraino is more infrastructure-level. So
great things happen when you collaborate
there. Then, yes, you need some Ledger,
and maybe some AI for contents. And
when you combine all this in the right way,
with industry collaboration, no single
ownership of trust, then I can literally
create data in the physical world – and if
I choose to, then I can share it or sell it to
complete strangers. This is scale.
I’ve never met anyone who has said this
can be done the way people are doing
things today. It won’t work, and people say
“Oh, that’s logical”. In the ocean you have
riptides, and people’s natural inclination is
to swim against the current back to shore.
If you try this you’ll get tired and you’ll
drown. In any new emerging market you
get this herd mentality, and just now that’s
all about lock-in models.
What we’re doing as an open
community is we’re swimming sideways,
which is what you’re supposed to do. You
collaborate, you get out of that lock-in,
and you start to open things up. In a
similar water analogy, I would say the
maker movement is why IoT came along.
It used to be with industrial, buildings,
manufacturing, whatever, they’d be
proprietary platforms that would lock you
in and cost you tens of thousands of
dollars a year.
The moment an innovative small
company pops up that threatens your way
of life – and this has been going on for
years – [they] buy ’em up and kill ’em. But
with all of the power from this open
collaboration, and the kickstarters, there’s
not enough money in the world to buy up
all those innovators.
You either change or you die, and this
is the innovators’ dilemma. So we’re all
about floating all the boats for open scale
and collaboration and, in this world, just
make sure your boat is really good and
really fast. You’ve got to innovate and
stay ahead. From Dell Technologies’
standpoint we gave away our code to
seed the project. The Linux Foundation
has to be completely transparent – they
do a great job running transparent, open
projects with governance when needed.

LXF: They do a great job organising these
interviews for me too. There are an awful
lot of distractions, both of the technical
and sugary nature.
JS: We knew that this needs to be open.
I’d say we’re at the ‘AOL’ stage of IoT: it’s
early days. Initially EdgeX is about
interoperability. The easiest way to
describe it to people is it will do for IoT
what Android did for mobile. You have to
abstract that interoperability of the

EDGEXTOLFEDGE


Sincethisinterview,EdgeXFoundry
hasbecomepartofLFEdge(https://
lfedge.org),LinuxFoundation’s
umbrellaorganisationwhichaims
tofurthertheEdgeunificationand
interoperabilityaboutwhichJason
spokesoeloquentlyinthisinterview.
LFEdgeissupportedbykey
industryplayersincludingArm,AT&T,
DellEMC,IBM,IntelandZededa.
BesidesEdgeX,otherLFEdge-hosted
projectsincludeAkraino(mentioned),
Baetyl(forconnectingcloud-native

applications),Fledge(forindustrial
edgeapplications)andProjectEVE
(TheEdgeVirtualizationEngine).
EVEconnectsatype-1hypervisor
withoptimisationsandhardening
designedespeciallyforrunningon
edgeandIoTdevices.Youcanread
moreaboutitinafutureissuewhen
thetranscriptionJonnibotgetsround
totypinguptheinterviewhejust
enjoyedinLyonwithnoneotherthan
ErikNordmark,cofounderof,andChief
Architectat,Zededa.

“I make you laugh? I’m
here to amuse you?”
Free download pdf