In 2014 mathematician Hannah Fry gave a TED talk where she presented the following set of equations that predicts the posi-
tivity of interactions between spouses:
Wt+1 = w + rWWt + IHW(Ht)
Ht+1= h + rHHt + IWH(Wt)Though they look complex, the two equations predict how each spouse will respond to the other depending on their respec-
tive moods and influence over each other. The reasoning goes that more positive interactions will lead to a more positive mar-
riage. Couples everywhere seemed to have a simple prescription: be more positive than negative, and you’ll have a better chance
at success. Now a recent finding adds a neuroscientific element to the balance. As David Z. Hambrick and Daisuke S. Katsuma-
ta write, individuals who score high in working memory have less enduring conflict in their romantic relationships (see “How
Research on Working Memory Can Improve Your Romantic Relationship”). This suggests that trying to resolve conflicts requires
you to pay closer attention to what your partner is saying. And don’t forget to stay positive as much as possible. And take out the
trash more often.
In perhaps more lighthearted news, neuroscientists Ryan P. Dalton and Francisco Luongo describe in this issue a fascinating
experiment in which rats were taught to play hide-and-seek while the researchers monitored their brain activity (see “Play May
Be a Deeper Part of Human Nature Than We Thought”). Specific neurons in the prefrontal cortex associated with reward lit up
during the game, suggesting that the brain’s response to play is evolutionarily ancient. We are hardwired for fun, it seems. And
that is a positive thought.
Andrea Gawrylewski
Senior Editor, Collections
[email protected]On the Cover
This cognitive ability
enables couples to
resolve their differences
more quickly RYAN KINGGETTY IMAGESYour Opinion Matters!
Help shape the future
of this digital magazine.
Let us know what you
think of the stories within
these pages by emailing us:
[email protected].In Love and Play
FROM
THE
EDITOR
LIZ TORMES