Raewyn Connell
The last stage of all is the waiting. This can be disconcerting. If it’s a high-prestige
journal, you can wait for a couple of years before seeing your work in print. By then the
discussion in the field may have moved on, and you have probably moved on to other
problems too.
Publication lag is not a new thing. One of the most famous articles in classical
scholarship announced Michael Ventris’ astonishing decipherment of the mysterious
Linear B script on the ancient clay tablets of Crete and mainland Greece. This paper
had the catchy title “Evidence for Greek dialect in the Mycenaean archives”. It was
submitted to the Journal of Hellenic Studies in November 1952 and published unusually
quickly, nine months later.
Decipher this! A Linear B tablet (Image: Wikimedia
Commons)
But while the authors were waiting,
the news leaked out, and reached
the media – resulting in an editorial
in The Times and international
celebrity for Ventris, all before the
scholarly article appeared.
Because of the lag problem, many
mainstream journals now publish an
article on-line soon after it is
accepted and copy-editing is
complete. You then have to wait
until the journal issue to which it is
allocated comes round, before you
have the details of volume and
issue number. Oddly, you may end
up with two different dates of
publication for one article. (Believe
it or not, there is now a bibliometric
research literature about this
problem.) Purely on-line journals
simplify this and usually mean
quicker publication, so they have
become more popular, especially in
the physical and biomedical
sciences.
Online or offline, your article has
finally hit the streets. Now open the
champagne, and invite the
neighbours in! Your work has joined
the vast, troubled, but inspiring
collective effort to develop human
knowledge and understanding.