Scientific American Mind - USA (2020-03 & 2020-04)

(Antfer) #1

Butler Hospital in Providence, R.I.
“I’d be shocked if it works.”
Such a drug might, however, be
part of a “therapeutic package”
of treatments that could eventually
make headway against Alzheimer’s,
he says. “The goal is to get a biologi-
cal foothold and then build on it,” he
adds. “The more targets we have,
the bigger the impact.”
Eric Reiman, CEO of Banner
Alzheimer’s Institute, an Arizo-
na-based research and advocacy
group, agrees that the study sug-
gests new possibilities for treatment.
“It provides a mechanism that could
be targeted by investigational and,
potentially, repurposed drugs,” he
says. “And it offers hypotheses that
can now be tested and extended by
the field.” Salloway, Reiman and other
experts emphasize that the findings
are preliminary and need to be
confirmed by future research.
Wang has long studied norepineph-
rine because of its role in thinking and
complex behaviors. She stumbled
across the connection to Alzheimer’s
as part of that research, she says.
In two strains of mice and in human
tissue in their new study, she and her
colleagues showed that small pieces
of beta-amyloid bind to a receptor for


norepinephrine, activating the
GSK3-beta enzyme and triggering
the tau to become toxic. They con-
firmed this relationship by blocking
the receptor with idazoxan in two
strains of middle-aged mice for eight
weeks. Doing so deactivated the
enzyme and prevented the tau from
becoming toxic.
For years, researchers had won-
dered how beta-amyloid and tau
were connected, says Rudolph Tanzi,
an expert on the molecular genetics
of Alzheimer’s at Massachusetts
General Hospital, who was not
involved in the new research. Scien-
tists essentially assumed that
beta-amyloid caused tau tangles
through a complicated chain of
events, he says.
Then, in a 2014 paper in Nature,
Tanzi and his colleagues used human
brain cells grown in a dish to reveal
a problem with the theory: mice—the
main source of research information
on Alzheimer’s—do not have the right
form of tau to cause tangles in people.
Instead the researchers showed that
in the human cells, beta-amyloid led
directly to tau tangles. Tanzi and his
colleagues blocked a variety of
different enzymes called kinases to
try to stop the process. They found

two, both of which blocked the
GSK3-beta enzyme—the same
one that Wang and her colleagues
identified in their Science Trans-
lational Medicine paper.
The new study, Tanzi says, takes his
own work a step further by showing
how beta-amyloid triggers activation
of the toxic tau. “It’s an important
paper,” he adds. “If it’s replicated, it
provides a good drug target.”
Tanzi believes that inflammation
is a key player in Alzheimer’s,
triggering the cascade that leads
to disease. He has previously
described beta-amyloid as the match
and tau tangles as the brushfires
burning in the brains of people with
the disease. “GSK3-beta, I guess
you could say, is the kindling for the
brushfire. And this explains how the
match gains access to the kindling,”
Tanzi says. Once the neuroinflamma-
tion starts, brain cells die at a far
faster rate, he adds.
Tanzi says he has unpublished data
on dozens of drugs that stop beta-
amyloid from triggering tau tangles,
many of which support what Wang
and her colleagues found in their new
paper. “I believe their data are going to
hold up,” he says. “And it’s exciting.”
—Karen Weintraub

Emotional Words
Such as “Love”
Mean Different
Things in Different
Languages
An analysis of more than 2,
languages reveals differences in
the way feelings are conceptualized
among cultures

Humans boast a rich trove of words
to express the way we feel. Some
are not easily translatable between
languages: Germans use “Welt-
schmerz” to refer to a feeling
of melancholy caused by the state
of the world. And the indigenous
Baining people of Papua New
Guinea say “awumbuk” to describe
a social hangover that leaves people
unmotivated and listless for days
after the departure of overnight
guests. Other terms seem rather
common—“fear,” for example, trans-
lates to “takot” in Tagalog and “ótti”
in Icelandic. These similarities and
differences raise a question: Does
the way we experience emotions
cross cultural boundaries?

NEWS

Free download pdf