“I say, you’re not crying, are you?” asked her brother.
Laura shook her head. She was.
Laurie put his arm round her shoulder. “Don’t cry,” he said in his warm, loving voice. “Was it awful?”
“No,” sobbed Laura. “It was simply marvellous. But Laurie—” She stopped, she looked at her brother.
“Isn’t life,” she stammered, “isn’t life—” But what life was she couldn’t explain. No matter. He quite
understood.
“Isn’t it, darling?” said Laurie.
p. 265What a terrific story! If you have any aspirations to fiction writing, the perfection of this story has
to inspire awe and envy. Before the questions, a bit of background. Katherine Mansfield was a writer
who came from New Zealand, although she spent her adult years in England. She was married to John
Middleton Murry, a writer and critic, was friends with D. H. and Frieda Lawrence (in fact, she was the
model, at least in part, for Gudrun in his Women in Love) , produced a sizable handful of very lovely and
accomplished stories, and died young of tuberculosis. Despite her slim output, there are those who would
rank her as one of the unquestioned masters of the short story form. The story printed here appeared in
1922, the year before she died. It is not autobiographical in any ways that matter for our purposes. So
are you ready for those questions?
First question: what does the story signify?
What is Mansfield saying in the story? What do you see it as meaning?
Second question: how does it signify?
What elements does Mansfield employ to cause the story to signify whatever it signifies? What
elements, in other words, cause it to mean the things you take it to mean?
Okay, here are the ground rules:
- Read carefully