Custom PC - UK (2020-04)

(Antfer) #1

AMD RADEON


RX590 /£165 inc VAT


SUPPLIER scan.co.uk

T


he Radeon RX 590 was something
of a last gasp for the company’s
Graphics Core Next architecture.
Designed as a drop-in upgrade for OEMs, the
GPU could be used on existing RX 580 board
designs. Indeed, the GPU is basically just an RX
580 with a die shrink and clock speed boost.
Over a year since launch – and many years
since the GCN architecture debuted – and this
card is seriously showing its age, but hefty
price drops mean it still has some merit.
The major downside to this older
architecture, though, is woefully bad power
efficiency. This card tops the power usage
charts in this group test by some margin,
despite it being far from the fastest. That’s
why our sample XFX card also required two
large fans and a hefty heatsink equipped with
four heatpipes to keep it cool. You’ll also need
plenty of additional power, with both a 6-pin
and an 8-pin PCI-E power socket sitting on the
top edge of this card.
When it comes to gaming performance,
though, the surprisingly low price means this
card can defy its age, consistently delivering
performance that beats the GeForce GTX
1650 Super, GTX 1660 and RX 5500 XT. In
this regard, it’s a standout bargain for cards
of its class. However, we really
can’t ignore that power
consumption, plus this
clocked-up GPU
also gets very
hot, requiring
substantial cooling
On our sample
XFX Fatboy card,
the large cooler
also stretches beyond
the width of two PCI-E
slots, so you’ll need to give

over three slots to accommodate it. The cooler
isn’t too noisy, but it’s massive. XFX has at least
made good use of the extra bulk of this card,
though, by equipping it with three DisplayPort
sockets as well as an HDMI and DVI. The
addition of a DVI port reduces the ventilation
through the backplate though.
What’s more, opting for this older GPU
(or indeed any AMD GPU at the moment)
means you miss out on the buzz feature of the
moment, in the form of hardware ray-tracing
support. While some of Nvidia’s cheaper
cards also omit this feature – or only have it in
a compromised form – AMD’s cards simply
don’t support it at all at the moment. In coming
years, the already aging architecture of this
GPU will also see it becoming less futureproof.

Conclusion
At first glance, everything about the AMD
Radeon RX 590 suggests it shouldn’t be much
of a contender. It’s an old card based on an old
architecture that’s infamously power-hungry
and lacks the allure of hardware ray-tracing
support. However, sheer gaming performance
and a very low price mean it’s surprisingly
competitive, even now. What’s more, unlike most
sub-£200 graphics cards, it also comes with
8GB of memory. If you can afford to stretch your
budget, you’ll be much better off overall saving
up for a GTX 1660 Super, but if there’s no slack,
the Radeon RX 590 is currently a cracking 1080p
gaming card for a surprisingly reasonable price.

VERDICT
A surprise price/performance champion,
but spending just a little more money
will get you more features and far lower
power consumption.

PERFORMANCE
37 / 50

RAY TRACING
0 / 10

OVERALL SCORE


70 %%


EFFICIENCY
4 / 10

VALUE
29 / 30

SPEC
Graphics processor AMD Radeon RX 590,
1469MHz base clock, 1580MHz boost clock
Pipeline 2,304 stream processors, 32 ROPs
Interface PCI-E 3
RT Cores 0
Tensor Cores 0
Memory 8GB GDDR5, 8GHz effective
Memory interface 128-bit
Bandwidth 256GB/sec
Outputs/inputs 3 x DisplayPort
1.4, 1 x HDMI 2b, 1 x DVI-D
Power connections 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin

RADAR
+^ Good 1080p^
performance
+^ Low price
+^ 8GB of memory

SEMAPHORE

-^ No ray tracing
-^ Very high power
consumption
-^ Needs lots of
cooling power


AMD RADEON


RX590/£165 inc VAT


SUPPLIERscan.co.uk

T


he Radeon RX 590 was something
of a last gasp for the company’s
Graphics Core Next architecture.
Designed as a drop-in upgrade for OEMs, the
GPU could be used on existing RX 580 board
designs. Indeed, the GPU is basically just an RX
580 with a die shrink and clock speed boost.
Over a year since launch – and many years
since the GCN architecture debuted – and this
card is seriously showing its age, but hefty
price drops mean it still has some merit.
The major downside to this older
architecture, though, is woefully bad power
efficiency. This card tops the power usage
charts in this group test by some margin,
despite it being far from the fastest. That’s
why our sample XFX card also required two
large fans and a hefty heatsink equipped with
four heatpipes to keep it cool. You’ll also need
plenty of additional power, with both a 6-pin
and an 8-pin PCI-E power socket sitting on the
top edge of this card.
When it comes to gaming performance,
though, the surprisingly low price means this
card can defy its age, consistently delivering
performance that beats the GeForce GTX
1650 Super, GTX 1660 and RX 5500 XT. In
this regard, it’s a standout bargain for cards
of its class. However, we really
can’t ignore that power
consumption, plus this
clocked-up GPU
also gets very
hot, requiring
substantial cooling
On our sample
XFX Fatboy card,
the large cooler
also stretches beyond
the width of two PCI-E
slots, so you’ll need to give

over three slots to accommodate it. The cooler
isn’t too noisy, but it’s massive. XFX has at least
made good use of the extra bulk of this card,
though, by equipping it with three DisplayPort
sockets as well as an HDMI and DVI. The
addition of a DVI port reduces the ventilation
through the backplate though.
What’s more, opting for this older GPU
(or indeed any AMD GPU at the moment)
means you miss out on the buzz feature of the
moment, in the form of hardware ray-tracing
support. While some of Nvidia’s cheaper
cards also omit this feature – or only have it in
a compromised form – AMD’s cards simply
don’t support it at all at the moment. In coming
years, the already aging architecture of this
GPU will also see it becoming less futureproof.

Conclusion
At first glance, everything about the AMD
Radeon RX 590 suggests it shouldn’t be much
of a contender. It’s an old card based on an old
architecture that’s infamously power-hungry
and lacks the allure of hardware ray-tracing
support. However, sheer gaming performance
and a very low price mean it’s surprisingly
competitive, even now. What’s more, unlike most
sub-£200 graphics cards, it also comes with
8GB of memory. If you can afford to stretch your
budget, you’ll be much better off overall saving
up for a GTX 1660 Super, but if there’s no slack,
the Radeon RX 590 is currently a cracking 1080p
gaming card for a surprisingly reasonable price.

VERDICT
A surprise price/performance champion,
but spending just a little more money
will get you more features and far lower
power consumption.

PERFORMANCE
37 / 50

RAY TRACING
0 / 10

OVERALLSCORE


70 %%


EFFICIENCY
4 / 10

VALUE
29 / 30

SPEC
Graphics processor AMD Radeon RX 590,
1469MHz base clock, 1580MHz boost clock
Pipeline 2,304 stream processors, 32 ROPs
Interface PCI-E 3
RT Cores 0
Tensor Cores 0
Memory 8GB GDDR5, 8GHz effective
Memory interface 128-bit
Bandwidth 256GB/sec
Outputs/inputs 3 x DisplayPort
1.4, 1 x HDMI 2b, 1 x DVI-D
Power connections 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin

RADAR




  • Good1080p
    performance




  • Lowprice




  • 8GB of memory




SEMAPHORE


  • Noraytracing

  • Very high power
    consumption

  • Needs lots of
    cooling power

Free download pdf