AMD RADEON
RX 5700 /£299 inc VAT
SUPPLIER overclockers.co.uk
T
he Radeon RX 5700 uses the same
configuration of the Navi 10 GPU as
the 5600 XT, with its four disabled
compute units. However, it ups the clock
speeds and uses a much wider 256-bit
memory interface for a whopping 448GB/
sec memory bandwidth. The result is an
impressively powerful card.
One of only two cards in this group
test to sport a blower-style cooler, the
reference RX 5700 is a very smart-looking
card. The smooth, clean lines of its cooler
shroud and illuminated Radeon logo is a
vast improvement over any of the other
cards we’ve seen in this group test – other
than the near identical RX 5700 XT. You do
miss out on a backplate, so it looks far less
appealing from that angle, which seems like
a missed opportunity.
The blower does a decent job of keeping
heat and noise in check, but the fan is noisier
than coaxial fan-based cooler designs.
The cooler also appears to contribute
to the overall length of the design, with
much shorter, multi-fan cooler designs
available. As such, despite its good looks, we
recommend a card with a third-party cooler.
Another crucial physical feature to note
is the requirement for both a 6-pin and an
8-pin PCI-E power cable. Most cards that
are cheaper and slower than this one require
only a single cable.
When it comes to internal features, the big
omission here is again the lack of ray-tracing
support. We can’t speak for how important
you may feel this feature is, but even if it’s just
for playing around with older or more simple
games, such as Minecraft and Quake, there’s
fun to be had with the new feature. The fact
that AMD cards simply don’t support it at all
puts them at a disadvantage.
Instead, the RX 5700 makes its bid for your
wallet based on pure gaming performance.
We’ve already seen how AMD’s new RDNA
architecture and 7nm manufacturing process
has vastly improved the performance and
power consumption of AMD’s latest graphics
cards, and the RX 5700 continues that trend.
The RX 5700 trades blows with the RTX
2060 Super across our testing, more often
than not coming out on top, even if the
margin is small. However, with the RX 5700 VERDICT
The pure performance champ at its price
point, but it lacks ray tracing.
PERFORMANCE
45 / 50
RAY TRACING
0 / 10
OVERALL SCORE
81 %%
EFFICIENCY
8 / 10
VALUE
28 / 30
T-REX
+^ Good for 1080p and^
1440p gaming
+^ Best bang for^
buck at its price
+^ Surprisingly
power-frugal
VELOCIRAPTOR
-^ Noisy stock blower fan
-^ Lacks ray tracing
costing £50 less than the RTX 2060 Super,
there’s a clear ray-tracing premium involved
here. If you’re not that fussed about it, the RX
5700 is clearly the better buy.
Not even power consumption holds back
the appeal of the RX 5700, with this card
actually using less power than the RTX
2060 Super when under load. Considering
how much AMD has struggled with this
side of things in recent years, it’s quite
astonishing to be able to say that.
Conclusion
There’s no two ways about it, the RX 5700
is the best pure bang for buck graphics card
at around the £300 price point right now,
and by some margin too. It’s as fast as the
RTX 2060 Super while using a fraction less
power and costing £50 less. However, you
miss out on ray tracing, so it really comes
down to how much you value you place on
having that feature.
SPEC
Graphics processor AMD Radeon RX
5700, 1465MHz base clock, 1625MHz
game clock, 1725MHz max boost clock
Pipeline 36 compute units, 2,304
stream processors, 64 ROPs
Interface PCI-E 4
RT Cores 0
Tensor Cores 0
Memory 8GB GDDR6, 14GHz effective
Memory interface 256-bit
Bandwidth 448GB/sec
Outputs/inputs 3 x DisplayPort 1.4, 1 x HDMI 2b
Power connections 1 x 8-pin, 1 x 6-pin
AMD RADEON
RX 5700 /£299 inc VAT
SUPPLIER overclockers.co.uk
T
he Radeon RX 5700 uses the same
configuration of the Navi 10 GPU as
the 5600 XT, with its four disabled
compute units. However, it ups the clock
speeds and uses a much wider 256-bit
memory interface for a whopping 448GB/
sec memory bandwidth. The result is an
impressively powerful card.
One of only two cards in this group
test to sport a blower-style cooler, the
reference RX 5700 is a very smart-looking
card. The smooth, clean lines of its cooler
shroud and illuminated Radeon logo is a
vast improvement over any of the other
cards we’ve seen in this group test – other
than the near identical RX 5700 XT. You do
miss out on a backplate, so it looks far less
appealing from that angle, which seems like
a missed opportunity.
The blower does a decent job of keeping
heat and noise in check, but the fan is noisier
than coaxial fan-based cooler designs.
The cooler also appears to contribute
to the overall length of the design, with
much shorter, multi-fan cooler designs
available. As such, despite its good looks, we
recommend a card with a third-party cooler.
Another crucial physicalfeaturetonote
is the requirement for botha 6-pinandan
8-pin PCI-E power cable.Mostcardsthat
are cheaper and slowerthanthisonerequire
only a single cable.
When it comes to internalfeatures,thebig
omission here is again thelackofray-tracing
support. We can’t speak forhowimportant
you may feel this featureis,butevenif it’sjust
for playing around with olderormoresimple
games, such as MinecraftandQuake,there’s
fun to be had with the newfeature.Thefact
that AMD cards simply don’tsupportit atall
puts them at a disadvantage.
Instead, the RX 5700 makesitsbidforyour
wallet based on pure gamingperformance.
We’ve already seen howAMD’snewRDNA
architecture and 7nm manufacturingprocess
has vastly improved the performanceand
power consumption of AMD’slatestgraphics
cards, and the RX 5700 continuesthattrend.
The RX 5700 trades blowswiththeRTX
2060 Super across ourtesting,moreoften
than not coming out ontop,evenif the
margin is small. However,withtheRX 5700 VERDICT
Thepureperformancechampatitsprice
point,butit lacksraytracing.
PERFORMANCE
45 / 50
RAYTRACING
0 / 10
OVERALLSCORE
81 %%
EFFICIENCY
8 / 10
VALUE
28 / 30
T-REX
+Goodfor1080pand
1440pgaming
+Bestbangfor
buckatitsprice
+Surprisingly
power-frugal
VELOCIRAPTOR
- Noisystockblowerfan
- Lacks ray tracing
costing £50 less than the RTX 2060 Super,
there’s a clear ray-tracing premium involved
here. If you’re not that fussed about it, the RX
5700 is clearly the better buy.
Not even power consumption holds back
the appeal of the RX 5700, with this card
actually using less power than the RTX
2060 Super when under load. Considering
how much AMD has struggled with this
side of things in recent years, it’s quite
astonishing to be able to say that.
Conclusion
There’s no two ways about it, the RX 5700
is the best pure bang for buck graphics card
at around the £300 price point right now,
and by some margin too. It’s as fast as the
RTX 2060 Super while using a fraction less
power and costing £50 less. However, you
miss out on ray tracing, so it really comes
down to how much you value you place on
having that feature.
SPEC
Graphics processor AMD Radeon RX
5700, 1465MHz base clock, 1625MHz
game clock, 1725MHz max boost clock
Pipeline 36 compute units, 2,304
stream processors, 64 ROPs
Interface PCI-E 4
RT Cores 0
Tensor Cores 0
Memory 8GB GDDR6, 14GHz effective
Memory interface 256-bit
Bandwidth 448GB/sec
Outputs/inputs 3 x DisplayPort 1.4, 1 x HDMI 2b
Power connections 1 x 8-pin, 1 x 6-pin