Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning

(Jeff_L) #1
58 1. INTRODUCTION

Thus we can view the mutual information as the reduction in the uncertainty aboutx
by virtue of being told the value ofy(or vice versa). From a Bayesian perspective,
we can viewp(x)as the prior distribution forxandp(x|y)as the posterior distribu-
tion after we have observed new datay. The mutual information therefore represents
the reduction in uncertainty aboutxas a consequence of the new observationy.

Exercises


1.1 () www Consider the sum-of-squares error function given by (1.2) in which
the functiony(x,w)is given by the polynomial (1.1). Show that the coefficients
w={wi}that minimize this error function are given by the solution to the following
set of linear equations
∑M

j=0

Aijwj=Ti (1.122)

where

Aij=

∑N

n=1

(xn)i+j,Ti=

∑N

n=1

(xn)itn. (1.123)

Here a suffixiorjdenotes the index of a component, whereas(x)idenotesxraised
to the power ofi.

1.2 () Write down the set of coupled linear equations, analogous to (1.122), satisfied
by the coefficientswiwhich minimize the regularized sum-of-squares error function
given by (1.4).

1.3 () Suppose that we have three coloured boxesr(red),b(blue), andg(green).
Boxrcontains 3 apples, 4 oranges, and 3 limes, boxbcontains 1 apple, 1 orange,
and 0 limes, and boxgcontains 3 apples, 3 oranges, and 4 limes. If a box is chosen
at random with probabilitiesp(r)=0. 2 ,p(b)=0. 2 ,p(g)=0. 6 , and a piece of
fruit is removed from the box (with equal probability of selecting any of the items in
the box), then what is the probability of selecting an apple? If we observe that the
selected fruit is in fact an orange, what is the probability that it came from the green
box?

1.4 () www Consider a probability densitypx(x)defined over a continuous vari-
ablex, and suppose that we make a nonlinear change of variable usingx=g(y),
so that the density transforms according to (1.27). By differentiating (1.27), show
that the location̂yof the maximum of the density inyis not in general related to the
location̂xof the maximum of the density overxby the simple functional relation
̂x=g(̂y)as a consequence of the Jacobian factor. This shows that the maximum
of a probability density (in contrast to a simple function) is dependent on the choice
of variable. Verify that, in the case of a linear transformation, the location of the
maximum transforms in the same way as the variable itself.

1.5 () Using the definition (1.38) show thatvar[f(x)]satisfies (1.39).
Free download pdf