breakdown of all kinds of food by intensify-
ing the transverse movement and integrating
long-axis rotation (that is, rolling) ( 2 ). Chew-
ing reduces the size of food to facilitate ac-
cess to nutrients. The smaller the particles,
the larger the surface available to gut micro-
biota, and acquiring the ability to digest a
new diet is a fundamental driver for the evo-
lution of new species ( 3 ). Mammalian teeth
play a key role in food processing because
they function as tools for breaking food into
pieces. In therian mammals, a typical form of
molars evolved (the tribosphenic, or multi-
functional molar) with a characteristic cusp
and basin pattern. This molar type is consid-
ered a revolution in mammalian evolution.
Its functionality widened the range of food
resources ( 4 ), and that this tooth type is re-
tained in the majority of omnivorous and in-
sectivorous mammals living today speaks for
its universal utility. It is consensus that the
tribosphenic molar gave rise to the variety
of tooth forms of extant mammals ( 5 ). How-
ever, the morphology combining cutting and
crushing functions is only fully functional in
combination with a transverse movement of
the lower jaw.
By definition, mammals possess a single
bone (dentary) as the tooth-bearing lower
jaw, and multiple tiny ossicles in the middle
ear (malleus, incus, and stapes). In mamma-
lian ancestors (nonmammalian cynodonts),
the lower jaw was composed of multiple
bones (angular, quadrate, and articular)
that transmitted sound by bone conduction
through the so-called mandibular ear, in ad-
dition to its function in catching prey and
chewing. In these early forms, the quadrate
and articular formed the primary jaw joint,
an articulation found in all jawed (gnathos-
tome) vertebrates ( 6 ). Transitional taxa like
Morganucodon had a double cranioman-
dibular joint; this consisted of a primary jaw
joint that coexisted with a derived secondary
articulation between the condyle (rounded
hinge area of a bone) of the lower jaw and
the squamosal (bone part of the vertebrate
skull of the cranium). In these early mam-
malian forms, the primary jaw joint was still
involved in both feeding and transmitting
sound to the inner ear. The middle ear bones,
still attached to the lower jaw and sitting
in grooves on the inner side of the dentary
(postdentary trough) were limited in their
mobility. In such close connection, hearing
and feeding functions interfered. Transverse
shift or even rolling of the dentary bone was
limited, because these movements would en-
tail displacement of the middle ear elements
inside the postdentary trough (see the fig-
ure). During the evolution of the mammalian
feeding function, the secondary jaw articula-
tion prevailed. The middle ear bones shrank
and shifted posteriorly, and the innovative
secondary jaw joint allowed more powerful
jaw movements and effective control of the
dentary during chewing ( 7 ).
Homology of the primary jaw joint bones
and the mammalian middle ear elements
is a classic case study of embryology, and
similarities were identified in the 19th cen-
tury. Supporting tissues, like the Meckelian
and palatoquadrate cartilages of the first
vertebrate pharyngeal arch, are embryonic
precursors to the articular and quadrate of
nonmammalian gnathostome vertebrates
and malleus and incus of living mammals ( 8 ).
Genetic mechanisms controlling the forma-
tion of the mammalian jaw and middle ear
became an area of interest in developmental
biology in the past 25 years. A series of cellu-
lar and molecular drivers in the developmen-
tal program of vertebrate pharyngeal arches
were identified, which also control formation
and detachment of the mammalian middle
ear ossicles from the lower jaw ( 9 , 10 ).
The complex developmental process of
the detachment of the middle ear elements
is well understood from an ontogenetic per-
spective, but timewise, the separation in the
stem lineage of therians was not known from
the fossil record. O. lii is the first fossil that
pinpoints the moment of detachment of the
middle ear ossicles from the Meckelian carti-
lage to Lower Cretaceous (~123 million years
ago). Other stem therian representatives like
Yanoconodon allini or Maotherium asiati-
cus, slightly older than O. lii, show separate
SCIENCE sciencemag.org
GRAPHIC: ADAPTED FROM (
1 ) AND (
15
) BY N. CARY/
SC IENCE
Position of Origolestes lii in the mammalian phylogeny
Origolestes
Yanoconodon
Monotremata
Monodelphis and Didelphis
Equus
2
1
3
4
Tr a n s v e r s e
movement
or roll
Schematic of the posterior side of the mammalian
dentary during the decoupling process (left ossicles
still connected to lower jaw, right detached)
Middle ear bones Meckel’s cartilage
1 Mammalia
2 Theriamorpha
3 Trechnotheria
4 Theria
Specimens of Origolestes lii were discovered
in the Lujiatun beds of the Yixian Formation,
Liaoning Province, China. The illustration shows
that the animals died at rest, a condition
similar to those found for other vertebrates from
the same locality, including dinosaurs.
Evolution of the therian dentary
and middle ear
The connection of the middle ear elements (teal)
to the lower jaw by means of the ossified Meckelian
cartilage (orange) is lost.
17 JANUARY 2020 • VOL 367 ISSUE 6475 245
Published by AAAS