428 | Nature | Vol 577 | 16 January 2020
Article
Our map does not allow us to assign amino acids in FACT that directly
participate in subnucleosome binding. To validate our structures,
we used hydrogen–deuterium exchange (HDX) coupled to mass spec-
trometry, comparing deuterium uptake in FACT alone and in FACT
bound to subnucleosomes (Extended Data Figs. 4, 5). On the basis of
volcano plot analysis^16 , we find a significant decrease in deuterium
uptake (with a ΔHDX of more than 0.3 Da; P < 0.01) in regions of the
dimerization and middle domains of SPT16 and SSRP1. These regions
map primarily to the inner face of the fork that interfaces directly with
DNA and histones (Fig. 2b–d). A decrease in deuterium is also observed
at the interface between the SSRP1 middle domain and both dimeriza-
tion domains (the hinge region) (Fig. 2b), suggesting decreased domain
flexibility upon subnucleosome binding. These solution-based results
are entirely consistent with the structures, and almost no changes in
deuterium uptake are observed in regions outside those present in
the structure.
Despite the extensive DNA interface, phosphorylated FACT purified
from insect cells is unable to bind free DNA (Fig. 2e). We hypothesizedaHistone
contact90°90°DNA binding hubDNA
contactFork tipsComplex 1DNA contactComplex5% native PAGE; Atto-647 labelSPT1 6
SSRP 1–FL ΔCFL ΔC
–FL FLΔC ΔCFree DNA
(30 bp)1 2 3 4 5cdefb0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 1,00010,000100120140160180200Fluorescence polarization (mP)ΔCΔCFACT (nM)560–572901–915864–870807–815619–620
622–636105–108135–139180–186201–215256–272343–345377–390406–407SPT16 SSRP1Hinge
region–110 –^210 –^310 –^410 –5–0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
ΔHDX (Da)P value486–50018–27560–567622–639
628–639623–639SPT16 DD622–636560–568
606–620567–573
11–271,016–1,030901–916807–815807–816902–916858–870
901–915859–870857–870909–917909–916SPT16 MDFACT versus FACT + subnucleosome10 –^110 –^210 –^310 –^410 –^5–0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
ΔHDX (Da)P valueSSRP1 DDFACT versus FACT + subnucleosome180–186180–188130–13998–118104–114131–138128–139
130–138130–136105–114203–214343–352344–352257–272208–222
256–272255–272SSRP1 MD
202–214377–391393–407380–392404–414201–207377–392132–138180–186Fig. 2 | FACT makes extensive contacts with tetrasome DNA. a, Surface
potential of the FACT–subnucleosome complex. Colouring changes from red
for −5 kT e−1 to blue for +5 kT e−1, generated with APBS Tools 2.1 (PyMOL 2.3.2).
Histones are omitted from the top centre and right panels. b, Regions of
significant (P < 0.01) changes in average HDX (ΔHDX, from c, d) are mapped
onto complex 1. Notable regions are coloured according to domain location
(Fig. 1a). Regions with no detectable change are in white; regions for which no
peptides were recovered are in grey. The grey arrow denotes protected regions
at the intersubunit interface. The subnucleosome is coloured wheat.
Representative uptake plots are listed in Extended Data Fig. 5. c, Volcano plot
comparing the average ΔHDX of SPT16 peptides in FACT and in FACT bound to
subnucleosomes at all time points. Each time point was collected in triplicate
(n = 3); the Welch’s t-test was one-sided. d, Volcano plot comparing average
ΔHDX of SSRP1 peptides in FACT and in FACT bound to subnucleosomes at all
time points. Each time point was collected in triplicate (n = 3) and the Welch’s t-
test was one-sided. For c, d, dotted lines show significance cut-offs of Δ average
HDX > 0.3 Da and P < 0.01 from a Welch’s t-test. Insignificant peptides are in
light grey, and significant peptides are coloured according to their domain
location and listed. e, DNA binding by FACT CTD deletions. We incubated
400 nM FACT or deletion constructs with 100 nM Atto-647-labelled 30-bp DNA,
and analysed the results by native PAGE, visualized by DNA f luorescence. This
was repeated twice with similar results, and multiple times with DNA of
different lengths. ΔC, ΔCTD; FL, full-length. f, Fluorescence polarization assay
of FACT (0–2, 500 nM) with 20 nM Alexa-488-labelled tetrasome. Dissociation
constants (Kd) (in nM): full-length FACT (magenta) 204.2 ± 19 (R^2 = 0.9723);
SPT16∆C–SSRP1 (blue) 184.8 ± 14 (R^2 = 0.9807); SPT16–SSRP1∆C (orange)
201.0 ± 50.6 (R^2 = 0.8266); and ∆C∆C (black) 28.15 ± 1.9 (R^2 = 0.9843). Kd and
standard deviations were derived from four biological replicates.