Nature - USA (2020-01-23)

(Antfer) #1
Nature | Vol 577 | 23 January 2020 | 565

effect of the TLS signature using previously published^27 data from an
additional cohort of 40 patients with melanoma who were receiving
CTLA4 blockade (Fig. 3f). Previous studies have demonstrated tumour
mutational burden as a predictive biomarker for response to ICB^28.
However, in this cohort of patients treated with anti-CTLA4, the TLS
signature is independent of mutational load (Extended Data Fig. 5b).
Moreover, the TLS signature was significantly associated with overall
survival in a previously published^22 dataset of pretreatment samples
from 69 patients who were undergoing anti-PD1 monotherapy or anti-
CTLA4 and anti-PD1 combination therapy (Fig. 3g). We also observed
the predictive effect of the TLS signature in a previously published^28
dataset of pretreatment samples from 41 patients who were treated with
anti-PD1 (of whom 50% had been exposed to anti-CTLA4 before anti-PD1
treatment) (Fig. 3h, Extended Data Fig. 5c). Finally, we performed meta
Cox regression analysis across the four cohorts treated with ICB, using
multiple immune signatures: of these, our TLS signature performed
best (Extended Data Fig. 5D). The TLS signature was also independent
of tumour mutational load in the cohort treated with anti-PD1 (Fig. 3i),
consistent with previous studies that have shown that immune gene
signatures are not correlated with mutational load^29. Although we did
not observe significant differences in the TLS gene-expression score
retrieved from pretreatment biospies with regards to ‘response evalu-
ation criteria in solid tumours’ (RECIST), we observed a notable differ-
ence in RNA-seq data from on-treatment biopsies that were collected on
cycle 1 at day 29, which was confirmed in previously published cases of
patients treated with anti-PD1^30 (Extended Data Fig. 5e, f ). This indicates
that TLS functionality is induced by ICB treatment in patients with a
clinical response. To further determine the biological relevance of our
TLS signature, we applied it to RNA-seq data from 13 additional samples
of melanoma that were obtained from patients who were receiving ICB,
and performed concurrent immunostaining of CD20 and CD3. The
samples with the highest TLS gene score contained TLSs (as detected
by CD20 immunostaining), which confirms the ability of our gene sig-
nature to predict samples with TLSs (Extended Data Fig. 5g).
In conclusion, our data provide evidence that TLSs may have a key
role in sustaining an immune-responsive microenvironment. This find-
ing opens avenues for therapeutic strategies that aim at enhancing
TLS formation and function, which could result in improved clinical
outcomes and responses to cancer immunotherapy.


Online content


Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting sum-
maries, source data, extended data, supplementary information,
acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author con-
tributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code
availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1914-8.



  1. Robert, C. et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N. Engl. J.
    Med. 372 , 2521–2532 (2015).

  2. Gopalakrishnan, V. et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1
    immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 359 , 97–103 (2018).
    3. Cristescu, R. et al. Pan-tumor genomic biomarkers for PD-1 checkpoint blockade-based
    immunotherapy. Science 362 , eaar3593 (2018).
    4. Ladányi, A. et al. Prognostic impact of B-cell density in cutaneous melanoma. Cancer
    Immunol. Immunother. 60 , 1729–1738 (2011).
    5. Messina, J. L. et al. 12-Chemokine gene signature identifies lymph node-like structures in
    melanoma: potential for patient selection for immunotherapy? Sci. Rep. 2 , 765 (2012).
    6. Cipponi, A. et al. Neogenesis of lymphoid structures and antibody responses occur in
    human melanoma metastases. Cancer Res. 72 , 3997–4007 (2012).
    7. Sautès-Fridman, C., Petitprez, F., Calderaro, J. & Fridman, W. H. Tertiary lymphoid
    structures in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19 , 307–325 (2019).
    8. Petitprez, F. A. d. R et al. B cells are associated with survival and immunotherapy response
    in sarcoma. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1906-8 (2020).
    9. Helmink, B. A. et al. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy
    response. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1922-8 (2020).
    10. Mihm, M. C., Jr & Mulé, J. J. Reflections on the histopathology of tumor-infiltrating
    lymphocytes in melanoma and the host immune response. Cancer Immunol. Res. 3 ,
    827–835 (2015).
    11. Dieu-Nosjean, M. C., Goc, J., Giraldo, N. A., Sautès-Fridman, C. & Fridman, W. H. Tertiary
    lymphoid structures in cancer and beyond. Trends Immunol. 35 , 571–580 (2014).
    12. Germain, C., Gnjatic, S. & Dieu-Nosjean, M. C. Tertiary lymphoid structure-associated B
    cells are key players in anti-tumor immunity. Front. Immunol. 6 , 67 (2015).
    13. Bindea, G. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the
    immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity 39 , 782–795 (2013).
    14. Amaria, R. N. et al. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable
    melanoma. Nat. Med. 24 , 1649–1654 (2018).
    15. De Silva, N. S. & Klein, U. Dynamics of B cells in germinal centres. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15 ,
    137–148 (2015).
    16. Rogers, P. R., Song, J., Gramaglia, I., Killeen, N. & Croft, M. OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2
    expression and is essential for long-term survival of CD4 T cells. Immunity 15 , 445–455
    (2001).
    17. Sade-Feldman, M. et al. Defining T cell states associated with response to checkpoint
    immunotherapy in melanoma. Cell 175 , 998–1013 (2018).
    18. Jerby-Arnon, L. et al. A cancer cell program promotes T cell exclusion and resistance to
    checkpoint blockade. Cell 175 , 984–997 (2018).
    19. Angelova, M. et al. Characterization of the immunophenotypes and antigenomes of
    colorectal cancers reveals distinct tumor escape mechanisms and novel targets for
    immunotherapy. Genome Biol. 16 , 64 (2015).
    20. Tarte, K., Zhan, F., De Vos, J., Klein, B. & Shaughnessy, J. Jr. Gene expression profiling of
    plasma cells and plasmablasts: toward a better understanding of the late stages of B-cell
    differentiation. Blood 102 , 592–600 (2003).
    21. Suan, D. et al. CCR6 defines memory B cell precursors in mouse and human germinal
    centers, revealing light-zone location and predominant low antigen affinity. Immunity 47 ,
    1142–1153 (2017).
    22. Gide, T. N. et al. distinct immune cell populations define response to anti-PD-1
    monotherapy and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combined therapy. Cancer Cell 35 , 238–255
    (2019).
    23. Cirenajwis, H. et al. NF1-mutated melanoma tumors harbor distinct clinical and biological
    characteristics. Mol. Oncol. 11 , 438–451 (2017).
    24. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell 161 ,
    1681–1696 (2015).
    25. Becht, E. et al. Estimating the population abundance of tissue-infiltrating immune and
    stromal cell populations using gene expression. Genome Biol. 17 , 218 (2016).
    26. Tirosh, I. et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-
    cell RNA-seq. Science 352 , 189–196 (2016).
    27. van Allen, E. M. et al. Genomic correlates of response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic
    melanoma. Science 350 , 207–211 (2015).
    28. Riaz, N. et al. Tumor and microenvironment evolution during immunotherapy with
    nivolumab. Cell 171 , 934–949 (2017).
    29. Lauss, M. et al. Mutational and putative neoantigen load predict clinical benefit of
    adoptive T cell therapy in melanoma. Nat. Commun. 8 , 1738 (2017).
    30. Roh, W. et al. Integrated molecular analysis of tumor biopsies on sequential CTLA-4 and
    PD-1 blockade reveals markers of response and resistance. Sci. Transl. Med. 9 , eaah3560
    (2017).


Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020
Free download pdf