Amandla! magazine | Issue 84

(Luxxy Media) #1

constitution emerged in 2014. It created a
phony parliamentary political system, in
which the balance of power was nullified
by the predominance of the invisible
financial power of the oligarchic caste. This
configuration has plunged the country into
extreme instability: 14 governments have
come and gone since 2011, without ever
questioning the economic model against
which the people rebelled.
In the meantime, the economic crisis
has worsened. To stay in power, all these
governments have just obediently applied
the policies dictated by foreign donors,
especially the IMF, the World Bank and
the European Union. They have constantly
pushed Tunisia more and more in the
same direction: austerity, privatisation,
guarantee of foreign investment, opening
of the domestic market and indebtedness.
Meanwhile, the two political poles in
the race for power have done everything to
undermine the transitional justice process.


Neither had an interest in destroying Ben
Ali’s machine. Both wanted to preserve it to
take it over. The electoral bases of the two
poles were built with the same clientelist
practices. This configuration of power
has plagued political life and accentuated
corruption and clientelism.
In 2019, the presidential elections
saw an increase in the power of populism.
Two candidates went to the second
round: Nabil Karoui, a media tycoon and
notoriously corrupt man, and Kais Saied, a
near-unknown constitutional law teacher.
Each in his own style, they both played
the card of populism. Karoui distributed


food aid; Saied promised young people
horizontality, reconstruction from below
and a fight against corruption. In a country
that aspires to justice, it was K. Saied who
won, with 72% of the vote, despite a record
abstention rate since 2011 (43%).

Kais Saied in power, an
autocracy that does not say
its name
The first government approved by Saied
lasted only 6 months and the second
11 months. Meanwhile, parliament had
become the scene of a ludicrous comedy in
which blows and insults were exchanged
between the political caricatures of
Islamists and Destourians. Of course, this
provoked protest movements and on the
evening of July 25, Independence Day,
the president decided to put an end to the
masquerade. In breach of the constitution,
he declared a state of emergency, and
announced the suspension of parliament

and the dismissal of the government.
Since then, he has reigned as the
sole master, legislating by decree. He
has progressively deinstitutionalised
political life, including: dissolution of the
Provisional Commission for the Verification
of the Constitutionality of Laws; unilateral
appointment of a new government;
dissolution of the Superior Council of the
Judiciary; dissolution of parliament; change
in the composition of the Independent High
Authority for Elections...
On the evening of 30th June, he
published a draft constitution that has
been divisive and provoked indignant
reaction in civil society. A referendum is

scheduled for July 25th 2022, with simple
“yes” or “no” options. (Since this article
was written, the new constitution was passed
in a suspect referendum with a poor turnout,
and the opposition “National Salvation
Front” has decided to boycott the December
parliamentary elections - ed).
The general climate is that of a
country in the grip of deep manipulation.
The president used every means at his
disposal – including public means – to get
his constitution adopted. The journalists’
union, human rights organisations,
feminist networks and opponents of the
autocratic process have denounced heavy-
handed attempts at muzzling them. They
called for the constitution to be rejected


  • some proposed a boycott, others a clear
    “no”.
    The main novelty – or rather
    regression – of the constitution is the
    establishment of a presidential regime
    in which the principles of separation,
    balance and reciprocal control of power are
    completely absent. All power is in the hands
    of one man, the president.
    Without going into detail, four points
    are enough to grasp the extent of the power
    grab:
    ● Regardless of the composition of the
    elected parliament, the president
    alone appoints the government.
    If motions of censure are passed
    successively against the government,
    the president may dissolve
    parliament.
    ● Members of the government may
    attend the plenaries and committees
    of the parliament without being
    invited by the elected representatives;
    and executive bills take precedence
    over legislative proposals.
    ● The members of the Constitutional
    Court are appointed and dismissed
    by the President and have very
    short terms. The court can only
    give an opinion at the request of the
    president or two-thirds of the elected
    representatives, and only on the
    specific points on which its opinion is
    requested.
    ● There is no mechanism for appealing
    against the president. The system is
    locked and bolted from the inside.
    Nobody is in a position to control or
    thwart presidential power.


And again this constitution brings the
debate back, once again, to the polarisation
of Islamists and modernists, while
obscuring economic and social issues. Not
much has changed.

Layla Riahi is a Tunisian researcher
and activist. She is part of the
Tunisian Platform of Alternatives as
well as the Working Group on Food
Sovereignty.

Protest against draft constitution in which the principles of separation, balance and reciprocal
control of power are completely absent. All power is in the hands of one man, the president.

INTERNATIONAL
Free download pdf