whatcar.com April 2020 55
entry-level Titanium trim with
the least powerful engine in the
line-up: a 123bhp 1.0-litre petrol.
With an asking price of just over
£20,000, is it worth the extra?
Our final contender is the Skoda
Kamiq, which has impressed us in
match-ups against the Volkswagen
T-Cross and Kia Stonic. For the first
time, it’s appearing here in 1.0 TSI
115 SE form, which could be the
sweet spot of the range.
DRIVING
Performance, ride,
handling, renement
Although it doesn’t have much
less power on paper, the Captur
is well off the pace here. Whereas
the Kamiq and Puma can cover0-60mph and 30-70mph in about
9.5sec, the Captur takes a full twoseconds longer. That’s not good on
a short motorway slip road with
a car full of people. The Capturalso has flat spots in its power
delivery, where acceleration seems
to tail off, only to increase again asengine revs rise further.
Special mention should go to thePuma’s mild hybrid technology.
It can’t drive the car on electricity
alone, but a small electric motorattached to the engine boosts
low-rev urgency and improves fuel
economy. That means the Pumapulls from as little as 1000rpm –
500rpm earlier than the Kamiq
and nearly 1000rpm sooner than
the Captur, so you have adequate
acceleration from lower enginespeeds. Changing gears is a joy in
the Puma, too, while the Kamiq’s
gearshift is also slick, but theCaptur’s is long and a bit vague.
The Captur’s engine can’tmatch the Kamiq’s and Puma’s
for refinement, either. The only
downside to the Puma’s engineis that it sounds boomy when it’s
asked to pull hard from low revs in
a high gear, something the Kamiqavoids. Around town, the Puma’s
automatic stop-start system works
almost imperceptibly, thanks tothe hybrid tech. The Kamiq fires
up again smartly, too, but the
Captur takes ages to wake up and
is frustratingly easy to stall.
Overall, the Puma is the quietestat 70mph, with the least wind
and road noise. You’ll notice more
gustiness in the Kamiq, along withsome slight engine noise, but the
Captur suffers most from windnoise and there’s a bit of whine
from the gearbox.
As for ride quality, the Kamiqis the most comfortable of our
contenders on all types of roads. Its
suspension is soft without beingwallowy, and only particularly
vicious ruts and bumps can be feltthrough your backside. The Captur
somehow manages to feel >>
Slightly rm edge to the ride is totally acceptable, given the agile, enjoyable handling
Captur’s sluggish 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbocharged engine is way off the pace
It isn’t as much fun as the Puma, but the Kamiq handles tidily and is very comfortable
FORD PUMA
RENAULT CAPTUR
SKODA KAMIQ
BEST
RIDEBEST
HANDLING