The_20Scientist_20March_202019 (1)

(singke) #1

Even with ample ACT options, chang-
ing up the treatments typically given
in a particular area is easier said than
done, says Amato. For many patients in
difficult-to-access regions of endemic
countries with poor access to clinics,
simply rolling out rotating partner drugs
every time ACT resistance pops up is not
always practical. In cases of delayed clear-
ance, researchers are experimenting with
tweaking the dose of artemisinin deriv-
ative, but this can be equally tricky to
implement—for instance, if the deriva-
tive can’t be easily separated from its ACT
partner because it normally comes in a
single pill or blister pack. “There are vari-
ous strategies on the table,” he says. “The
question is, which ones are actually logis-
tically implementable?”
And while the evidence says that
partial artemisinin resistance doesn’t
cause ACT failure on its own, Alonso
acknowledges that, with an ever-evolving
parasite, the situation could change
tomorrow. “In public health, one learns to
never say never.” g


Natalie Slivinski is a freelance science
journalist living in Seattle, Washington.


References


  1. L. Cui, X. Su, “Discovery, mechanisms of action
    and combination therapy of artemisinin,”
    Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther, 7:999–1013, 2010.

  2. T.E. Wellems, C .V. Plowe, “Chloroquine-resistant
    malaria,” J Infect Dis, 184:770–76, 2001.

  3. D. Payne, “Did medicated salt hasten the spread
    of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium
    falciparum?” Parasitol Today, 4:112–15, 1988.

  4. M. Chinappi et al., “On the mechanisms
    of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium
    falciparum,” PLOS ONE, 5:e14064, 2010.

  5. C. Roper et al., “Intercontinental spread of
    pyrimethamine-resistant malaria,” Science,
    305:1124, 2004.

  6. J.-F. Trape et al., “Impact of chloroquine
    resistance on malaria mortality,” C R Acad Sci
    III , 321:689-97, 1998.

  7. F. Nosten et al., “Effects of artesunate-
    mefloquine combination on incidence
    of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and
    mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a
    prospective study,” Lancet, 356:297–302, 2000.

  8. R. Leang et al., “Therapeutic efficacy of fixed
    dose artesunate-mefloquine for the treatment
    of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium
    falciparum malaria in Kampong Speu,
    Cambodia,” Malaria J, 12:343, 2013.

  9. A. Mukherjee et al., “Inactivation of
    plasmepsins 2 and 3 sensitizes Plasmodium
    falciparum to the antimalarial drug
    piperaquine,” Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
    62:pii:e02309–17, 2018.

  10. K. Thriemer et al., “Delayed parasite clearance
    after treatment with dihydroartemisinin-


piperaquine in Plasmodium falciparum malaria
patients in central Vietnam,” Antimicrob Agents
Chemother, 58:7049–55, 2014.


  1. R. Leang et al., “Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin–
    piperaquine for treatment of uncomplicated
    Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax
    in Cambodia, 2008 to 2010,” Antimicrob Agents
    Chemother, 57:818–26, 2013.

  2. H. Noedl et al., “Evidence of artemisinin–
    resistant malaria in western Cambodia,” N Engl
    J Med, 359:2619–20, 2008.

  3. K. Thriemer et al., “Delayed parasite clearance
    after treatment with dihydroartemisinin-
    piperaquine in Plasmodium falciparum malaria
    patients in central Vietnam,” Antimicrob Agents
    Chemother, 58:7049–55, 2013.

  4. A. Hott et al., “Artemisinin-resistant
    Plasmodium falciparum parasites exhibit
    altered patterns of development in infected
    erythrocytes,” Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
    59:3156–67, 2015.

  5. M. Imwong et al., “The spread of artemisinin-
    resistant Plasmodium falciparum in the
    Greater Mekong subregion: A molecular
    epidemiology observational study,” Lancet
    Infect Dis, 17:491–97, 2017.

  6. R. Amato et al., “Origins of the current
    outbreak of multidrug-resistant malaria in
    southeast Asia: A retrospective genetic study,”
    Lancet Infect Dis, 18:P337–45, 2018.

  7. L. Roberts, “Drug–resistant malaria advances in
    Mekong,” Science, 358:155–56, 2017.

  8. E.A. Ashley et al., “Spread of artemisinin
    resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria,”
    N Engl J Med, 371:411–23, 2014.


THE SEARCH FOR A BETTER ANTIMALARIAL
While experts debate the relevance of ACT resistance to the fight against malaria, researchers are always looking for alternatives. One
option is to combine existing drugs in new ways. For instance, a Phase 2 clinical trial monitoring more than 2,000 patients throughout the
Greater Mekong, southern Asia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo is investigating whether the partner drug mefloquine can be com-
bined with the ACT dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PP), as the mechanisms by which P. falciparum evades mefloquine and piperaquine
appear to be mutually exclusive.
Simply recombining existing drugs may not be sufficient, however, and the search for antimalarial drugs with new mechanisms of action—
such as damaging the parasite’s digestive vacuole membrane or disrupting its ability to stick to red blood cells—is also underway. A dozen or
so drugs, including both alternative partner drugs and novel artemisinin derivatives, are currently in early- to mid-stage clinical development.
One new combination therapy, which has shown promise in Phase 2 trials against parasites that exhibit partial resistance to artemisinin, part-
ners the chloroquine-like drug ferroquine with artefenomel, the first potential synthetic alternative to artemisinin. Artefenomel has a much lon-
ger half-life than artemisinin-derived drugs, allowing it to be given as a single dose. It has also shown high activity against the resistance-prone
ring stage of the parasite.
Most of the antimalarials in development attack blood-stage schizonts, the stage that causes illness. However, a handful instead target
the gametocyte stage picked up by the mosquito. Such drugs would not cure an existing infection, but could control transmission, a critical
aspect of malaria elimination. Tw o of these, tafenoquine and primaquine, have advanced through Phase 3 trials, but they can’t be used broadly,
because they can cause severe damage to red blood cells in patients with a genetic condition called G6PD deficiency that is common in Africa.
Another leading candidate, KAF 156, which doesn’t carry the same risk, is currently being tested in Phase 2b trials in combination with the
partner drug lumefantrine.
With a parasite that continues to evade many existing antimalarial treatments, says David Kaslow, director for the PAT H Malaria Vaccine
Initiative, “we’ve got to continue to invest in new drugs.”

Free download pdf