It’s a no-brainer to harness renewable energy sources like solar
and wind. But a recent study in PNAS suggested that wind (and
other renewables) will fall short of slashing carbon emissions,
because there just isn’t enough of it in the U.S. Based on data
from a company owned by one of the study’s authors, this
map’s white areas show where wind turbines would be most
effective — but because wind isn’t available all the time, they’d
only produce roughly 50 percent of the energy wind turbines
could at maximum capacity. Cooler colors indicate spots where
turbines would have little impact. The team’s suggestion? Focus
on investing in backup sources, like nuclear and bioenergy, to
pick up the slack that renewables can’t cover.
Requesting Backup
TOP: VIBRANT CLEAN ENERGY, LLC. BOTTOM: BRETT SEYMOUR/EUA/WHOI/ARGO
0% 12.5% 25% 37.5% 50%
Average Hourly
Capacity Factor
October 2017^ DISCOVER^15
`
`
Source: NOAA’s High Resolution
Rapid Refresh data
els like you are
``
shaking hands
``
with these people
byrecovering their
personal possessions.
``
— Swedish underwater archaeologist Brendan
``
on retrieving artifacts from ancient sunken sh
``
Foley explores an ancient shipwreck off the coast of Greece.